Effect of scenario on perceptual sensitivity to errors in animation

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Reitsma, Paul S A ^a   O'Sullivan, Carol ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; Graphics; Perception; Psychophysics

Indexed keywords

COLLISION DETECTION; COLLISION EVENTS; GRAPHICS; NEUTRAL ENVIRONMENT; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL SIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RIGID BODY COLLISION; VIEWING ANGLE; VISUAL CUES;

ABSTRACTING; ANIMATION; COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ERRORS;

EID: 70349108823     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1577755.1577758     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ALAIS, D. AND BURR, D. 2004. No bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Cognitive Brain Res. 19, 2, 185-194.
2. BARZEL, R., HUGHES, J. F., ANDWOOD, D. N. 1996. Plausible motion simluations for computer graphics animation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
3. CHENNEY, S. AND FORSYTH, D. A. 2000. Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'00). ACM, New York, 219-228.
4. COHEN, R. L. 1964. Problems in motion perception. Uppsals, Sweden: Lundequistska.
5. CORNSWEET, T. 1962. The staircase method in psychophysics. Amer. J. Psych. 485-491.
6. HICHEUR, H., VIEILLEDENT, S., RICHARDSON, M., FLASH, T., AND BERTHOZ, A. 2005. Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: A comparison with hand movements. Exper. Brain Res. 162, 145-154.
7. HODGINS, J. K., O'BRIEN, J. F., AND TUMBLIN, J. 1998. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 4, 4, 307-316.
8. KAISER, M. K. AND PROFFITT, D. R. 1987. Observers? sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions. Percept. Psychophys. 42, 3, 275-280.
9. LEVITT, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 467-477.
10. MACMILLAN, N. A. AND CREELMAN, C. D. 1991. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. MCGURK, H. AND MACDONALD, J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264, 746-748.
12. METZGER, W. 1934. Beobachtungen über phänomenale identität. Psychologische Forschung 19, 1-60.
13. MICHOTTE, A. 1963. The Perception of Causality. Metheun, London.
14. OESKER, M., HECHT, H., AND JUNG, B. 2000. Psychological evidence for unconscious processing of detail in real-time animation of multiple characters. J. Visual. Comput. Animation 11, 105-112.
15. O'SULLIVAN, C. AND DINGLIANA, J. 2001. Collisions and perception. ACM Trans. Graph. 20, 3, 151-168.
16. O'SULLIVAN, C., DINGLIANA, J., GIANG, T., AND KAISER, M. K. 2003. Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically-based animations. ACM Trans. Graph. 2, 3, 527-536.
17. POPOVIĆ, Z. 2000. Controlling physics in realistic character animation. Comm. ACM 43, 7, 50-58.
18. REITSMA, P. S. A. AND O'SULLIVAN, C. 2008. Effect of scenario on perceptual sensitivity to errors in animation. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV'08). ACM, New York.
19. REITSMA, P. S. A. AND POLLARD, N. S. 2003. Perceptual metrics for character animation: Sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 537-542.
20. REITSMA, P. S. A., ANDREWS, J., AND POLLARD, N. S. 2008. Effect of character animacy and preparatory motion on perceptual magnitude of errors in ballistic motion. Comput. Graph. Forum 27, 2, Eurographics, 201-210.
21. SEKULAR, R., SEKULAR, A., AND LAU, R. 1997. Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385, 308.
22. STAPPERS, P. J. ANDWALLER, P. E. 1993. Using the free fall of objects under gravity for visual depth estimation. Bull. Psychonomic Soc. 31, 2, 125-127.
23. TWIGG, C. D. AND JAMES, D. L. 2007. Many-worlds browsing for control of multi-body dynamics. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3.