Effect of scenario on perceptual sensitivity to errors in animation

APGV 2008 - Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 115-121

  Reitsma, Paul S A ^a   O'Sullivan, Carol ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Animation; Perception; Psychophysics

Indexed keywords

COLLISION DETECTIONS; COLLISION EVENTS; NEUTRAL ENVIRONMENTS; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL SIMULATIONS; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RIGID BODY COLLISIONS; VIEWING ANGLES; VISUAL CUES;

ABSTRACTING; ANIMATION; COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; VISUALIZATION;

ERRORS;

EID: 63449109318     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1394281.1394302     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. ALAIS, D., AND BURR, D. 2004. No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(2), 185-194.
2. BARZEL, R., HUGHES, J. F., AND WOOD, D. N. 1996. Plausible motion simluations for computer graphics animation. In Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Computerm Animation and Simulation.
3. CHENNEY, S., AND FORSYTH, D. A. 2000. Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 219-228.
4. COHEN, R. L. 1964. Problems in motion perception. Uppsals, Sweden: Lundequistska.
5. CORNSWEET, T. 1962. The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 485-491.
6. HICHEUR, H., VIEILLEDENT, S., RICHARDSON, M., FLASH, T., AND BERTHOZ, A. 2005. Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: A comparison with hand movements. In Experimental Brain Research, no. 162, 145-154.
7. HODGINS, J. K., O'BRIEN, J. F., AND TUMBLIN, J. 1998. Perception of human motion with different geometric models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 4, 4 (October), 307-316.
8. KAISER, M. K., AND PROFFITT, D. R. 1987. Observers' sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions. Perception & Psychophysics, 42(3), 275-280.
9. LEVITT, H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 467-477.
10. MACMILLAN, N. A., AND CREELMAN, C. D. 1991. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge University Press, New York.
11. MCGURK, H., AND MACDONALD, J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264 (Dec.), 746-748.
12. METZGER, W. 1934. Beobachtungen über phänomenale identität. Psychologische Forschung 19, 1-60.
13. MICHOTTE, A. 1963. The perception of causality. Metheun, London.
14. OESKER, M., HECHT, H., AND JUNG, B. 2000. Psychological evidence for unconscious processing of detail in real-time animation of multiple characters. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 11, 105-112.
15. O'SULLIVAN, C., AND DINGLIANA, J. 2001. Collisions and perception. ACM Transactions on Graphics 20, 3 (July), 151-168.
16. O'SULLIVAN, C., DINGLIANA, J., GIANG, T., AND KAISER, M. K. 2003. Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations. In ACM Transactions on Graphics 2, 3, 527-536.
17. POPOVIĆ , Z. 2000. Controlling physics in realistic character animation. Communications of the ACM 43, 7, 50-58.
18. REITSMA, P. S. A., AND POLLARD, N. S. 2003. Perceptual metrics for character animation: Sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3 (July), 537-542.
19. REITSMA, P. S. A., ANDREWS, J., AND POLLARD, N. S. 2008. Effect of character animacy and preparatory motion on perceptual magnitude of errors in ballistic motion. In Computer Graphics Forum (Eurographics), vol. 27(2), 201-210.
20. SEKULAR, R., SEKULAR, A., AND LAU, R. 1997. Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature, v.385, pp.308.
21. STAPPERS, P. J., AND WALLER, P. E. 1993. Using the free fall of objects under gravity for visual depth estimation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31, 2, 125-127.
22. TWIGG, C. D., AND JAMES, D. L. 2007. Many-worlds browsing for control of multibody dynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3.