Species-level heritability reaffirmed: A comment on "On the heritability of geographic range sizes"

American Naturalist

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 129-135

  Hunt, Gene ^a   Roy, Kaustuv ^a   Jablonski, David ^b  

^a University of California at San Diego   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Geographic range size; Heritability

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FOSSIL; GASTROPOD; GENETICS; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FOSSILS; GASTROPODA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 21244480521     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/430722     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
3. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Addison Wesley Longman, Essex.
4. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160:712-726.
5. Gaston, K. J. 1998. Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353:219-230.
6. Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Grantham, T. A. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to macroevolution: recent work on species selection and the "effect hypothesis." Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:301-322.
8. Housworth, E. A., E. P. Martins, and M. Lynch. 2004. The phylogenetic mixed model. American Naturalist 163:84-96.
9. Jablonski, D. 1986. Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bulletin of Marine Science 39:565-587.
10. _. 1987. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous mollusks. Science 238:360-363.
11. _. 2000. Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26(suppl. to no. 4):15-52.
12. Manly, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, London.
13. Okasha, S. 2003. The concept of group heritability. Biology and Philosophy 18:445-461.
14. Qian, H., and R. E. Ricklefs. 2004. Geographical distribution and ecological conservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America. Journal of Ecology 92: 253-265.
15. Ricklefs, R. E., and R. E. Latham. 1992. Intercontinental correlation of geographical ranges suggests stasis in ecological traits of relict genera of temperate perennial herbs. American Naturalist 139: 1305-1321.
16. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
17. Webb, T. J., and K. J. Gaston. 2003. On the heritability of geographic range sizes. American Naturalist 161:553-566.
18. Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.