A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2009, Pages E1042-E1050

  Pult, Heiko ^a   Murphy, Paul J ^a   Purslow, Christine ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contact lens; Dry eye; Lid parallel conjunctival folds; Lid wiper epitheliopathy; Questionnaire; Symptoms; Tear film

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYPEREMIA; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PHENOLSULFONPHTHALEIN; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; STAINING AND LABELING; TEARS; XEROPHTHALMIA; YOUNG ADULT;

DRY EYE; LID PARALLEL CONJUNCTIVAL FOLDS; LID WIPER EPITHELIOPATHY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYMPTOMS; TEAR FILM;

CONTACT LENSES; PHENOLS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TESTING;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

PHENOLSULFONPHTHALEIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA LIMBUS; DRY EYE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HORIZONTAL BULBAR AND LIMBAL HYPEREMIA; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; LID PARALLEL CONJUNCTIVAL FOLDS; LID WIPER EPITHELIOPATHY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LOWER EYELID; MALE; NON INVASIVE BREAK UP TIME; OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TEAR FILM; TEAR MENISCUS HEIGHT;

EID: 70349098116     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: 15389235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b598cd     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Morgan PB, Efron N. Demographics of UK contact lens prescribing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008;31:50-1.
2. Morgan PB, Efron N. A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996-2005). Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:59-68.
3. Pritchard N. How can we avoid CL drop-outs? Optician 2001;222:14-18.
4. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:157-62.
5. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26:168-74.
6. Weed K, Fonn D, Potvin R. Discontinuation of contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70 (Suppl):140.
7. Döhr C. Contact lens wearing comfort. Paper presented at the Contact ’05, VDC Congress, Augsburg, Germany, October 1-2, 2005.
8. Morgan PB. Is the UK contact lens market healthy? Optician 2001;221:5795:22-6.
9. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:25-30.
10. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:279-85.
11. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:279-85.
12. Berry M, Pult H, Purslow C, Murphy PJ. Mucins and ocular signs in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:930-8.
13. Pult H, Purslow C, Berry M, Murphy PJ. Clinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potential. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:924-9.
14. Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:829-34.
15. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1319-28.
16. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Chalmers R, Begley C. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea 2002;21:469-75.
17. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea 2004;23:272-85.
18. Bron AJ. Diagnosis of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45 (Suppl 2):S221-S226.
19. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox MD. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5116-24.
20. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:615-21.
21. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:40-6.
22. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B, Simpson T, DuToit R, Portello J, Davis L. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea 2001;20:610-18.
23. Guillon JP. Use of the Tearscope Plus and attachments in the routine examination of the marginal dry eye contact lens patient. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:859-67.
24. Dundas M, Walker A, Woods RL. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:30-5.
25. Murphy PJ, Lau JS, Sim MM, Woods RL. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Eye 2007;21:633-8.
26. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-32.
27. Pult H, Murphy PJ, Purslow C, Nyman J, Woods RL. Limbal and bulbar hyperaemia in normal eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008;28:13-20.
28. Pult H. The predictive ability of clinical tests for dry eye in contact lens wear. PhD Thesis. Wales, UK: Cardiff University; 2008.
29. Höh H, Schirra F, Kienecker C, Ruprecht KW. [Lid-parallel conjunctival folds are a sure diagnostic sign of dry eye]. Ophthalmologe 1995;92:802-8.
30. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn J, Gilmartin B. Conjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:35-8.
31. Markoulli M, Carnt N, Jalbert I, Keay L, Naduvilath T, Papas E. Resolution and clinical characteristics of conjunctival “flaps”. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:E-Abstract 5391.
32. Thota S, Perrigin J, Miller W, Leach N, Bergmanson J, Back A. Conjunctival flaps in silicone hydrogel lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:E-Abstract 82.
33. Hamano H, Hori M, Hamano T, Mitsunaga S, Maeshima J, Kojima S, Kawabe H, Hamano T. A new method for measuring tears. CLAO J 1983;9:281-9.
34. Korb DR, Herman JP, Solomon JD, Greiner JV, Blackie CA. Lid wiper staining and sequential fluorescein instillation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:E-Abstract 242.
35. Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman JP, Hebert E, Finnemore VM, Exford JM, Glonek T, Olson MC. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers. CLAO J 2002;28:211-6.
36. Korb DR, Herman JP, Greiner JV, Scaffidi RC, Finnemore VM, Exford JM, Blackie CA, Douglass T. Lid wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye symptoms. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:2-8.
37. Garson GD. PA765 Multivariate analysis in public administration. Available at: . Accessed February 12, 2008.
38. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:92-106.
39. Van Belle G, Fischer LD, Heagerty PJ, Lumley T. Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2004.
40. Korb DR. Tear film-contact lens interactions. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994;350:403-10.
41. Guillon M, Guillon JP. Hydrogel lens wettability during overnight wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989;9:355-9.
42. Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Dynamic wettability of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006;26:408-18.
43. Lin M, Copley KA, Radke CJ. Assessment of pre-lens tear-film stability by slit-lamp examination, placido ring reflection, IBUT, and advancing contacting angles: do they correlate? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:E-Abstract 95.
44. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Vascular response to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:147-51.
45. Papas E. On the relationship between soft contact lens oxygen transmissibility and induced limbal hyperaemia. Exp Eye Res 1998;67:125-31.
46. McMonnies CW, Chapman-Davies A, Holden BA. The vascular response to contact lens wear. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982;59:795-9.
47. Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High-oxygen-transmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:942-8.
48. Morgan P, Brennan N. Evaluating corneal oxygenation during lens wear. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:6-13.
49. Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, Feng Y, Jones L, Fonn D. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:758-68.
50. Schafer J, Mitchell GL, Chalmers RL, Long B, Dillehay S, Barr J, Bergenske P, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J. The stability of dryness symptoms after refitting with silicone hydrogel contact lenses over 3 years. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:247-52.
51. Ousler GW III, Anderson RT, Osborn KE. The effect of senofilcon A contact lenses compared to habitual contact lenses on ocular discomfort during exposure to a controlled adverse environment. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:335-41.
52. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S101-4.
53. Schafer J. Choosing lens materials to solve dryness complaints. Contact Lens Spectrum 2006;21:23.
54. Young G, Riley CM, Chalmers RL, Hunt C. Hydrogel lens comfort in challenging environments and the effect of refitting with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:302-8.
55. Ruston D, Meyler J. A new silicone hydrogel lens, Part 2: subjective clinical performance. Optician 2005;230:37-9.
56. Osborn K, Veys J. A new silicone hydrogel lens for contact lens-related dryness, Part 1: material properties. Optician 2005;229:39-41.
57. Dillehay SM. Does the level of available oxygen impact comfort in contact lens wear? a review of the literature. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:148-55.
58. Pult H, Purslow C, Murphy PJ. An update on the objective and subjective evaluation of contact lens related dry eye. Optom Today 2007;47:42-6.
59. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SC, Sanabria O, Kell H, Garcia CG, Felix C, Feuer W, Reis BL. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea 1998;17:38-56.
60. Nichols KK, Zadnik K. The repeatability of diagnostic tests and surveys in dry eye. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506:1171-5.
61. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.
62. Research in dry eye: report of the Research Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf 2007;5:179-93.