A randomized controlled trial of an automated telephone intervention to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Graziano, Judith A ^a   Gross, Cynthia R ^b  

^a METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic disease management; Diabetes; Health belief model; Randomized controlled trial; Telephone intervention; Type 2

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TELEPHONE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 70349093167     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181b117a9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Diabetes Association. All about diabetes, 2008. http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/ prevalence.jsp. Accessed July 18, 2008.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet United States, 2005. http://www. cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs 2005.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2008
3. Wright A, Burden AC, Paisey RB, Cull CA, Holman RR; UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Sulfony-lurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57). Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):330-336.
4. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil AW, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, Cull CA. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;12:405-412.
5. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.
6. Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer H, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA1c. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:275-278.
7. Koro CE, Bowlin SJ, Bourgeois N, Fedder DO. Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among US adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:17-20.
8. Harris MI. Health care and health status and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:754-758.
9. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes melli-tus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986.
10. O?Conner PJ, Rush WA, Peterson J, et al. Continuous quality improvement can improve glycemic control for HMO patients with diabetes. Arch Fam Med. 1996;5:502-506.
11. Peters AL, Davidson MB. Application of a diabetes managed care program: the feasibility of using nurses and a computer system to provide effective care. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1037-1043.
12. Friedman RH, Kazis LE, Jette A, et al. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension: impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. Am J Hyper-tens. 1996;9:285-292.
13. Follick MH, Gorkin L, Smith TW, Capone R, Visco J, Stablein D. Quality of life post-myocardial infarction: effects of a transtelephonic coronary in-tervention system. Health Psychol. 1988;7:169-182.
14. Eakin S, Lawler C, Vandelanotte N, Owen N. Telephone interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:419-434.
15. Riegel B, Carlson B, Kopp Z, LePetri B, Unger A, Glaser D. Effect of a standardized nurse case management telephone intervention on resource use in chronic heart failure patients. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:705-712
16. American Association of Diabetes Educators. Intensive diabetes management: implications of the DCCT and UKPDS. Diabetes Educ. 2002;28:735-740.
17. Rothman AJ. Is there nothing more practical than a good theory? Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2004;1:11. http://www.ijbnpa.org/ content/1/1/11. Accessed October 25, 2008.
18. Abraham C, Sheeran P. Cognitive representations and preventive health behavior: a review. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA, eds. Perceptions of Health and Illness: Current Research and Applications. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harwood Academic; 1997:213-240.
19. Daniel M, Messer LC. Perceptions of disease severity and barriers to self-care predict glycemic control in aboriginal persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chronic Dis Can. 2002;23:130-138. http://www. phac-aspc.gc.ca/ publicat/cdic-mcc/23-4/b e.html. Accessed September 17, 2006.
20. Polly RK. Diabetes health beliefs, health care behaviors, and glycemic control among older adults with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1992;18:321-327.
21. Fitzgerald JT, Anderson RM, Funnel MM, et al. Differences in the impact of dietary restrictions on African Americans and Caucasians with NIDDM. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23:41-47.
22. American Association of Diabetes Educators. AADE7 self-care behaviors. http://www.diabeteseducator. org/ProfessionalResources/AADE7. Published 2009. Accessed July 18, 2008.
23. Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the Diabetes Care Profile. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19:208-230.
24. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Wisdom K, Davis WK, Hiss RG. A comparison of global versus disease-specific quality-of-life measures in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:299-305.
25. RCMAR Measurement Tools. Diabetes Care Profile (DCP). 2006. www.musc.edu/dfm/RCMAR/DCP. html. Published 2008. Accessed July 6, 2009.
26. Kim H, Oh J. Adherence to diabetes control recommendations: impact of nurse telephone calls. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44:256-261.
27. Kim H, Oh J, Lee H. Effects of nurse-coordinated intervention on patients with type 2 diabetes in Korea. J Nurs Care Qual. 2005;20:154-160. (Pubitemid 40521750)
28. Oh J, Kim H, Yoon K, Choi E. A telephone-delivered intervention to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Yonsei Med J. 2003;44:1-8.
29. Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer F, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a department of Veterans Affairs health care system. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:202-208.
30. Young RJ, Taylor J, Friede T, et al. Pro-active call center treatment support (PACCTS) to improve glucose control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;18:278-282.
31. Mease A. Telemedicine improved diabetic management. Mil Med. 2000;165:579-584.
32. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ, Mah CA, Krae-mer FB, Crapo LM. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med. 2000;108:20-27.
33. Adams AS, Mah C, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Barton MB, Ross-Degnan D. Barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose among adults with diabetes in an HMO: a cross sectional study. http://www.biomedcentral. com/1472-6963/3/6. Published 2003. Accessed October 2, 2008.
34. Bruce DG, Davis WA, Cull CA, Davis TME. Diabetes education and knowledge in patients with type 2 diabetes from the community: the Fremantle diabetes study. J Diabetes Comp. 2002;17:82-89.
35. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Resource utilization and costs of care in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:1468-1478.
36. Delamater AM. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diabetes. 2006;24:71-77.
37. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Oh MS. The relationship of diabetes-related attitudes and patients? self-reported adherence. Diabetes Educ. 1993;19:287-292.
38. Matthews SM. The effect of individual attitudes toward diabetes on glycemic control. http://stti. confex.com/stti/congrs07/techprogram/paper 35186.htm. Published 2007. Accessed October 2, 2008.