The diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease: A new algorithm

Breast Care

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 255-259

  Adibelli, Zehra H ^a   Oztekin, Ozgur ^a   Postaci, Hakan ^b   Uslu, Adam ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Turkey)

^b Department of Pathology ^*

^c Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Male breast cancer; Mammography; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CYST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; GYNECOMASTIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE BREAST; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70249147662     PISSN: 16613791     EISSN: 16613805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000226284     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hines SL, Tan WW, Yasrebi M, DePeri ER, Perez EA: The role of mammography in male patients with breast symptoms. Maya Clin Proc 2007;82:297-300.
2. Chantra P, So G, Wollman J, Basset L: Mammography of the male breast. AJR 1995;164:853-858.
3. Kopans D: Breast Imaging, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2007, pp. 671-672.
4. Nutall FQ: Gynecomastia as a physical finding in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979;48:338-340.
5. Munn S: When should men undergo mammography? AJR 2002;178:1419-1420.
6. American College of Radiology (ACR): ACR BI-RADS, mammography; in ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Breast Imaging Atlas, 4th ed. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology, 2003.
7. American College of Radiology (ACR): Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Ultrasound. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology, 2003.
8. Goldman L: Quantitative aspects of clinical reasoning; in Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, et al. (eds): 13th ed. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, pp. 9-14.
9. Daniels IR, Layer GT: How should gynaecomastia be managed? ANZ J Surg 2003;73:213-216.
10. Gunhan-Bilgen I, Bozyaka H, Ustun EE, Memis A: Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol 2002;43: 246-255.
11. Patterson S, Helvie M, Aziz K, Nees AV: Outcome of men with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound. Breast J 2006;12: 418-423.
12. Evans GFF, Anthony T, Appelbaum AH, Schump-ert TD, Levy KR, Amirkhan RH, Cambell TJ, Lopez J, Turnage RH: The diagnostic accuracy of mammography in the evaluation of male breast disease. Am J Surg 2001;181:96-100.
13. Appelbaum AH, Evans GF, Levy KR, Amirkhan RH, Schumpert TD: Mammographic appearances of male breast disease. Radiographics 1999;19:559-568.
14. Mathew J, Perkins GH, Stephens T, Middleton LP, Yang WT: Primary breast cancer in men: clinical, imaging, and pathologicPrinciples findingsof Internal in 57 Medicine, patients. AJR 2008;191:1631-1639.
15. Dershaw D, Borger P, Deutch B, Liberman L: Mammographic findings in men with breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:267-270.
16. Hittmair AP, Lininger RA, Tavassoli FA: Ductal carcinoma in situ in the male breast: a morphological study of 84 cases of pure DCIS and 30 cases of DCIS with invasive carcinoma-preliminary report. Cancer1998;83:2139-2149.
17. Yang WT, Whitman GJ, Yuen EHY, Tse GMK, Stelling CB: Sonographic features of primary breast cancer in men. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:413-416.
18. Shin SJ, Rosen PP: Bilateral presentation of fibro-adenoma with digital fibroma-like inclusions in the male breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:1126-1129.