USING THE "MR. BIG" TECHNIQUE TO ELICIT CONFESSIONS: SUCCESSFUL INNOVATION OR DANGEROUS DEVELOPMENT IN THE CANADIAN LEGAL SYSTEM?

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 168-193

  Smith, Steven M ^a   Stinson, Veronica ^a   Patry, Marc W ^a  

^a SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

confessions; false confession; international perspectives on confession; legal issues in confession; Mr. Big undercover operation; police undercover operations

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249143660     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0016962     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Amato v. The Queen (2 S. C. R. 418 1982).
2. Australia Evidence Act (1995). http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw/Legislation/ActCompilation1.nsf/0/4E8408C9DF2B023BCA257528002CD087?OpenDocument Retrieved March 10, 2009, from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw/Legislation/ActCompilation1.nsf/0/4E8408C9DF2B023BCA257528002CD087?OpenDocument
3. Bull R. Can training enhance the detection of deception?. In: Yuille J.C. (Ed). Credibility Assessment (1989), Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York 83-99
4. Bull R., and Milne B. Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In: Lassiter G.D. (Ed). Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment (2004), Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York 181-196
5. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. The one that got away: W5 investigates (1998), CBC Television, Toronto, ON
6. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Man convicted in Mountie slayings knew Roszko wanted to kill officers (2009). http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2009/01/29/edm-cheeseman-tapes.html Retrieved on February 10, 2009 from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2009/01/29/edm-cheeseman-tapes.html
7. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. N. S. woman admits she strangled daughter to keep boyfriend (2009). http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia/story/2009/01/30/ns-karissa-guilty.html Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/nova-scotia/story/2009/01/30/ns-karissa-guilty.html
8. Edkins V.A., and Wrightsman L.S. The psychology of entrapment. In: Lassiter G.D. (Ed). Interrogations, confessions and entrapment (2004), Klewer, New York, NY 215-245
9. Ekman. Lying and deception. In: Stein N.L., Ornstein P.A., Tversky B., and Brainerd C. (Eds). Memory for Everyday and Emotional Events (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 333-347
10. Gardner C. R. C. M. P. clarify & defend the "Mayerthorpe Mister Big" operation. RCMP Watch (February, 2004). http://www.rcmpwatch.com/rcmp-clarify-defend-the-mayerthorpe-mister-big-operation/ Retrieved February 27, 2009, from http://www.rcmpwatch.com/rcmp-clarify-defend-the-mayerthorpe-mister-big-operation/
11. Garrett B.L. Claiming innocence. Minnesota Law Review 92 (2008) 1629-1723
12. Grandinetti v. R. (1 S. C. R. 27, 2005 SCC 5 2005).
13. Gudjonnson G.H. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook (2003), Wiley, London
14. Gudjonsson G.H., Sigurdsson J.F., Asgeirsdottir B.B., and Sigfusdottir I.D. Custodial interrogation, false confession and individual differences: A national study among Icelandic youth. Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 49-59
15. Gudjonsson G.H., Sigurdsson J.F., and Einarsson E. The role of personality in relation to confessions and denials. Psychology, Crime and Law 10 (2004) 125-135
16. Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Einarsson, E., Bragason, O. O., & Newton, A. K. (in press). Interrogative suggestibility, compliance and false confessions among prison inmates and their relationship with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Psychological Medicine
17. Home Office. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Codes of Practice A-E Revised Edition (2003), HMSO, London
18. Horselenberg R., Merckelbach H., Smeets T., Franssens D., Peters G., and Zeles G. False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter?. Psychology, Crime & Law 12 (2006) 61-75
19. Horvath v. The Queen (2 S. C. R. 376 1979).
20. Ibrahim v. The King (A. C. 599 [P. C.] 1914).
21. Inbau F.E., Reid J.E., Buckley J.E., and Jayne B.C. Essentials of the Reid Technique: Criminal interrogation and confessions (2005), Jones & Bartlett, Boston, MA
22. Ives D.E. Preventing false confessions: Is Oickle up to the task?. San Diego Law Review (2007, April 6) 1-26
23. Kassin S.M. The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist 52 (1997) 221-233
24. Kassin S.M. On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk?. American Psychologist 60 (2005) 215-228
25. Kassin S.M. Confession evidence: Common sense and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior 35 (2008) 1309-1322
26. Kassin S.M., Drizin S.A., Grisso T., Gudjonsson G.H., Leo R.A., and Redlich A.D. Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations (2009). http://www.ap-ls.org/links/confessions.pdf Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.ap-ls.org/links/confessions.pdf
27. Kassin S.M., Goldstein C.J., and Savitsky K. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior 27 (2003) 187-203
28. Kassin S.M., and Kiechel K.L. The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science 7 (1996) 125-128
29. Kassin S.M., and Gudjonsson G.H. The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (2004) 33-67
30. Lassiter G.D., and Geers A.L. Bias and accuracy in the evaluation of confession evidence. In: Lassiter G.D. (Ed). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (2004), Klewer, New York, NY 197-214
31. Lassiter G.D., Geers A.L., Munhall P.J., Handley I.M., and Beers M.J. Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera?. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33 (2001) 189-254
32. Law.jrank.org (2009). Comparative criminal law and enforcement: Russia - the admissibility of evidence. Retrieved March 11, 2009, from http://law.jrank.org/pages/682/Comparative-Criminal-Law-Enforcement-Russia-admissibility-evidence.html
33. Ma Y. A comparative view of the law of interrogation. International Criminal Justice Review 17 (2007) 5-26
34. Manitoba. The inquiry regarding Thomas Sophonow: The investigation, prosecution and consideration of entitlement to compensation (2002), Department of Justice, Winnipeg, MB. http://www.gov.mb.ca/justice/sophonow/recommendations/english.html Available at: www.gov.mb.ca/justice/sophonow/recommendations/english.html; retreived August 3, 2009
35. Meissner C.A., and Kassin S.M. "You're guilty, so just confess!" Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In: Lassiter G.D. (Ed). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (2004), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY 85-106
36. Memon A., Vrij A., and Bull R. Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. 2nd ed. (2003), Wiley, Chichester, UK
37. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
38. Morissette Y.-M. The exclusion of evidence under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: What to do and what not to do. McGill Law Journal 29 (1984) 521
39. National DNA Databank of Canada. The National DNA Databank of Canada Annual Report 2003-2004 (2004), RCMP, Ottawa, ON, Canada
40. O'Sullivan M., and Ekman P. The wizards of deception detection. In: Granhag G., and Strömwall L. (Eds). The detection of deception in forensic contexts (2004), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 269-286
41. Patry M.W., Stinson V., and Smith S.M. Supreme Court of Canada addresses admissibility of post-hypnosis witness evidence: R. v. Trochym (2007). Canadian Psychology 50 (2009) 98-105
42. Pavic v. R. (192 CLR 159 1998).
43. Porter S., Woodworth M., and Birt A.R. Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior 24 (2000) 643-658
44. Prosko v. The King (63 S. C. R. 226 1922).
45. R. v. Bonisteel (BCCA 344 2008).
46. R. v. Boudreau (NSSC 30 2009).
47. R. v. Collins (1 S. C. R. 265 1987).
48. R. v. Franz (B. C. T. C. 439 2000).
49. R. v. Hebert (2 S. C. R. 151 1990).
50. R. v. Hodgson (2 S. C. R. 449 1998).
51. R. v. L. T. H. (SCC 49 2008).
52. R. v. Mack (2 S. C. R. 903 1988).
53. R. v. Mentuck (MBQB 155 2000).
54. R. v. Oickle (2 S. C. R. 2000).
55. R. v. Osmar (ONCA 50 2007).
56. R. v. Rothman (1 S. C. R. 640 1981).
57. R. v. Swaffield (192 CLR 159 1998).
58. R. v. T. C. M. (C. J. No. 2705; BCSC 1778; BC. C. 2007).
59. R. v. Valliere (B. C. J. No. 2822; 2004 BCSC 1766; 2004 BC. C. 2004).
60. R. v. Whittle (2 S. C. R. 914 1994).
61. Rothman v. The Queen (1 S. C. R. 640 1981).
62. Russano M.B., Meissner C.A., Narchet F.M., and Kassin S.M. Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 481-486
63. Sands A. Mountie sued by former suspect now heads Sherwood Park detachment,. Edmonton Sun (2005). http://www.injusticebusters.com/05/Steinke_Gary.shtml January 20, 2005. Retrieved on June 3, 2009 from http://www.injusticebusters.com/05/Steinke_Gary.shtml
64. Scheck B., Neufeld P., and Dwyer J. Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right (2000), Signet, New York, NY
65. Schopp R.F., and Patry M.W. The guilty mind and capital sentencing: Integrating legal and empirical inquiry. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21 (2003) 631-651
66. Skinnider E. The art of confessions: A comparative look at the law of confessions - Canada, England, the United States, and Australia. International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy (2005). http://www.icclr.law.ubc.ca/Publications/Reports/ES%20PAPER%20CONFESSIONS%20REVISED.pdf Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://www.icclr.law.ubc.ca/Publications/Reports/ES%20PAPER%20CONFESSIONS%20REVISED.pdf, accessed February 2, 2009
67. Slobogin C. An empirically based comparison of American and European regulatory approaches to police investigation. In: van Koppen P.J., and Penrod S.D. (Eds). Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (2004), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY 27-54
68. The King v. Warrickshall, 1783 SP REX v. WARRICKSHALL. April Sessions (1783). Old Bailey. 1 Leach, CL 263; SC 2 East, P.
69. Vrij A. "We will protect your wife and child, but only if you confess": Police interrogations in England and the Netherlands. In: van Koppen P.J., and Penrod S.D. (Eds). Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (2003), Klewer, New York, NY 55-79
70. Ward v. The Queen (2 S. C. R. 30. 1979).
71. Wegener D.T., Kerr N.L., Fleming M.A., and Petty R.E. Flexible correction of juror judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6 (2000) 629-654
72. Wegener D.T., and Petty R.E. The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 29 (1997), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 141-208
73. Wells G.L., Malpass R.S., Lindsay R.C.L., Fisher R.P., Turtle J.W., and Fulero S.M. From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist 55 (2000) 581-598
74. Yant M. Presumed guilty: When innocent people are wrongly convicted (1991), Prometheus, Buffalo, NY