Confronting Power through Policy: On the Creation and Spread of Liberating Knowledge

Journal of Human Development

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 259-282

  Hill, Marianne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Capability; Liberating knowledge; Methodologies; Policy; Power; Social choice; Standpoint

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249142365     PISSN: 14699516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649880701371158     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alkire, S., 2002. Valuing Freedoms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Alkire, S., 2007, forthcoming. “ ‘Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses’ ”. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application, Edited by: Alkire, S, Comim, F, and Qizilbash, M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, E., 2003. ‘Sen, ethics and democracy’. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 239–262.
4. Arnsperger Ch, Varoufakis Y. 2006. ‘What is neoclassical economics?’ Post‐Autistic Economics Review. 38. 1-10. [http://www.paecon.net]
5. Barker, D., and Feiner, S., 2004. Liberating Economics, Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press.
6. Cohen, J. D., 2005. ‘The vulcanization of the human brain: a neural perspective on interactions between cognition and emotion’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4): 3–24.
7. Collins, P. H., 2000. Black Feminist Thought, New York: Routledge.
8. Damasio, A., 1994. Descartes' Error, New York: Grosset/Putnam.
9. Deneulin, S., 2007a. “ ‘Beyond individual freedom and agency: structures of living together in the capability approach to development’ ”. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application, Edited by: Alkire, S, Comim, F, and Qizilbash, M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Deneulin, S., 2007b. “ ‘Values, choices and the limits of liberalism in the capability approach’ ”. paper presented at the Conference on ‘Identity, Community and Justice’, University of York, 23–24 May
11. Drèze, J., and Sen, A., 2005. India: Development and Participation, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
12. Farmer, P., 2005. Pathologies of Power, Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
13. Frank, R. H., 1988. Passions within Reason, New York: W.W. Norton.
14. Frediani, A. A., 2007. ‘Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the redress of urgan poverty: a Brazilian case study’. Journal of Human Development, 8(1): 133–152.
15. Gasper, D., 2007 forthcoming. ‘Adding links, adding persons, and adding structures: using Sen's frameworks—a response to Qizilbash’. Feminist Economics, 3(1): 67–85.
16. Goodin, R. E, and Pettit, P, eds. 2000. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, Malden, Mass: Blackwell Press.
17. Grapard, U., 1999. “ ‘Methodology’ ”. In The Elgar Companion to Feminist Economics, Edited by: Peterson, J, and Lewis, M. 544–555. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
18. Hamilton, L., 1999. ‘A theory of true interests’. Government and Opposition, 34(4): 516–46.
19. Hartsock, N., 1998. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited, Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
20. Haugaard, M., 1997. The Constitution of Power, New York: St Martin's Press.
21. Hill, M., 2003. ‘Development as empowerment’. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 117–136.
22. Hill, M., 2007. “ ‘Theory and practice in Sen's capability framework’ ”. Briefing Paper 0207, Center for Policy Research, Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning, Jackson, Mississippi
23. Kanbur R, Shaffer P. 2005. ‘Epistemology, normative theory and poverty analysis: implications for Q‐Squared in practice’ Q‐Squared Working Paper No. 2. October [http://www.q-squared.ca/papers.html] (accessed January 2007)
24. Kaul, N., 2003. “ ‘The anxious identities we inhabit’ ”. In Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, Edited by: Barker, D, and Kuiper, E. 194–210. London and New York: Routledge.
25. MacKinnon, C. A., 1993. “ ‘Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: toward feminist jurisprudence’ ”. In Feminist Legal Theory Foundations, Edited by: Weisberg, D. K. 427–436. Philadelphia, Pa: Temple University Press.
26. Nelson, J., 1995. “ ‘Economic theory and feminist theory’ ”. In Out of the Margin, Edited by: Kuiper, E, and Sap, J. 120–129. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Nussbaum, M., 2003. ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements’. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 33–60.
28. Peter, F., 2003. ‘Gender and the foundations of social choice: the role of situated agency’. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 13–32.
29. Peterson, V. S., 2002. ‘Rewriting (global) political economy’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 4(1): 1–30.
30. Robeyns, I., 2003. ‘Sen's capability approach and gender inequality’. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 61–92.
31. Robeyns, I., 2007. ‘Sen's capability approach and feminist concerns’, in S. Alkire, F. Comim and M. Qizilbash (Eds.). The Capability Approach, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press
32. Robeyns I, Swift A. 2006. ‘Call for Papers—Workshop 17—Helsinki 2007’ European Consortium for Political Research [http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr] (accessed January 2007)
33. Sen, A., 1989. ‘Development as capability expansion’. Journal of Development Planning, 19: 41–58.
34. Sen, A., 1995. ‘Rationality and social choice’. American Economic Review, 85(1): 1–24.
35. Sen, A., 1999. Development as Freedom, New York: Random House.
36. Sen, A., 2003. ‘Continuing the conversation’. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 319–332.
37. Shutt C. 2006. ‘Review of Power: A Radical View by Stephen Lukes (Palgrave, 2005)’ Maitreyee. 6. October [http://www.hd-ca.org] (accessed February 2007)
38. Tarrow, S., 1998. Power in Movement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. United Nation Development Programme. Human Development Report, New York, UNDP
40. Williamson, O., 2000. ‘The new institutional economics’. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.