Simultaneous design and control of chemical processes with application to the Tennessee Eastman process

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1377-1391

  Ricardez Sandoval, L A ^a   Budman, H M ^a   Douglas, P L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Design and control; Structured Singular Value; Variability

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PROCESS; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; DESIGN AND CONTROL; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL; SIMULTANEOUS DESIGN AND CONTROL; STRUCTURED SINGULAR VALUE; STRUCTURED SINGULAR VALUE ANALYSIS; TENNESSEE EASTMAN PROCESS; TIME HORIZONS; VARIABILITY; WORST CASE SCENARIO;

ALGORITHMS; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; DESIGN; MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; PROCESS DESIGN;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 70249142113     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Brengel D.D., and Seider W.D. Coordinated design and control optimization of nonlinear processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering 16 (1992) 861-886
2. Alhammadi H.Y., and Romagnoli J.A. Process design and operation incorporating environmental, profitability, heat integration and controllability considerations. In: Seferlis P., and Georgiadis M.C. (Eds). The Integration of Process Design and Control (2004), Elsevier, Amsterdam 264-305
3. Lenhoff A.M., and Morari M. Design of resilient processing plants - 1. Process design under consideration of dynamics aspects. Chemical Engineering Science 37 (1982) 245-258
4. Luyben M.L., and Floudas C.A. Analyzing the interaction of design and control - 1. A multiobjective framework and application to binary distillation synthesis. Computers & Chemical Engineering 18 (1994) 933-969
5. Palazoglu A., and Arkun Y. Multiobjective approach to design chemical plants with robust dynamic operability characteristics. Computers & Chemical Engineering 10 (1986) 567-575
6. Palazoglu A., and Arkun Y. Design of chemical plants with multiregime capabilities and robust dynamic operability characteristics. Computers & Chemical Engineering 11 (1987) 205-216
7. Bahri P.A., Bandoni J.A., and Romagnoli J.A. Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes. AICHE Journal 43 (1997) 997-1015
8. Bansal V., Perkins J.D., and Pistikopoulos E.N. A case study in simultaneous design and control using rigorous, mixed-integer dynamic optimization models. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 41 (2002) 760-778
9. Bansal V., Ross R., Perkins J.D., and Pistikopoulos E.N. The interactions of design and control: double-effect distillation. Journal of Process Control 10 (2000) 219-227
10. Bansal V., Perkins J.D., Pistikopoulos E.N., Ross R., and Van Schijndel J.M.G. Simultaneous design and control optimisation under uncertainty. Computers & Chemical Engineering 24 (2000) 261-266
11. Dimitriadis V.D., and Pistikopoulos E.N. Flexibility analysis of dynamic systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 34 (1995) 4451-4462
12. Kookos I.K., and Perkins J.D. An algorithm for simultaneous process design and control. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 40 (2001) 4079-4088
13. Mohideen M.J., Perkins J.D., and Pistikopoulos E.N. Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty. AICHE Journal (1996) 42 2251-2272
14. Mohideen M.J., Perkins J.D., and Pistisopoulos E.N. Robust stability considerations in optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty. Journal of Process Control 7 (1997) 371-385
15. Perkins J.D., and Walsh S. Optimization as a tool for design/control integration. Computers & Chemical Engineering 20 (1996) 315-323
16. Ross R., Perkins J.D., Pistikopoulos E.N., Koot G.L.M., and Van Schijndel J.M.G. Optimal design and control of a high-purity industrial distillation system. Computers & Chemical Engineering 25 (2001) 141-150
17. Sakizlis V., Perkins J.D., and Pistikopoulos E.N. Recent advances in optimization-based simultaneous process and control design. Computers & Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 2069-2086
18. C.A. Schweiger, C.A. Floudas, Interaction of design and control: optimization with dynamic models, in: Proceedings of Conference on Optimal Control: Theory, Algorithms and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Gainesville, USA, 1998, pp. 388-435.
19. Swartz C.L.E. The use of controller parametrization in the integration of design and control. In: Seferlis P., and Georgiadis M.C. (Eds). The Integration of Process Design and Control (2004), Elsevier 239-263
20. Ricardez Sandoval L.A., Budman H.M., and Douglas P.L. Application of robust control tools to the simultaneous design and control of dynamic systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48 (2009) 801-813
21. Chawankul N., Budman H., and Douglas P.L. The integration of design and control: IMC control and robustness. Computers & Chemical Engineering 29 (2005) 261-271
22. Chawankul N., Ricardez Sandoval L.A., Budman H., and Douglas P.L. Integration of design and control: a robust control approach using MPC. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 85 (2007) 433-446
23. J. Gerhard, M. Monnigmann, W. Marquardt, Constructive nonlinear dynamics - foundations and application to robust nonlinear control, in: Control and Observer Design for Nonlinear Finite and Infinite Dimensional Systems. Springer-Verlag, 2005, pp. 165-182.
24. Gerhard J., Marquardt W., and Monnigmann M. Normal vectors on critical manifolds for robust design of transient processes in the presence of fast disturbances. SIAM Journal of Applied Dynamical Systems (2008) 461-490
25. Monnigmann M., and Marquardt W. Steady-state process optimization with guaranteed robust stability and flexibility: application to HDA reaction section. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 44 (2005) 2737-2753
26. Ricardez Sandoval L.A., Budman H.M., and Douglas P.L. Simultaneous design and control of processes under uncertainty: a robust modelling approach. Journal of Process Control 18 (2008) 735-752
27. Downs J.J., and Vogel E.F. Plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering 17 (1993) 245-255
28. Ramirez E., and Gani R. Methodology for the design and analysis of reaction-separation systems with recycle. 2. Design and control integration. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 46 (2007) 8084-8100
29. Wu K., and Yu C. Operability for processes with recycles: interaction between design and operation with application to the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (1997) 2239-3351
30. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User 2/E. second ed. (1999), Prentice-Hall, PTR, New Jersey, USA
31. L.A. Ricardez Sandoval, Simultaneous design and control of chemical plants: a robust modelling approach, Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, University of Waterloo, 2008. .
32. Helmicki A.J., Jacobson A., and Nett C.N. Control oriented system identification: a worst-case/deterministic approach in H∞. IEEE Transactions in Automatic Control 36 (1991) 1163-1176
33. Chen J., and Gu G. Control-Oriented System Identification: An H∞ approach. first ed. (2000), John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA
34. Webb C., Budman H., and Morari M. Identification of uncertainty bounds for robust control with application to a fixed bed reactor. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 34 (1995) 1743-1754
35. Lee J.H., Braatz R.D., Morari M., and Packard A. Screening tools for robust control structure selection. Automatica 31 (1995) 229-235
36. Braatz R.D., Lee J.H., and Morari M. Screening plant designs and control structures for uncertain systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering 20 (1996) 463-468
37. Nagy Z.K., and Braatz R.D. Worst-case and distributional robustness analysis of finite-time control trajectories for nonlinear distributed parameter systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 11 (2003) 694-704
38. Fan M.K.H., Tits A.L., and Doyle J.C. Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 36 (1991) 25-38
39. L.A. Ricardez Sandoval, H.M. Budman, P.L. Douglas, Simultaneous design and control of the Tennessee Eastman process, in: Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 2008, pp. 12911-12916.
40. Ricker N.L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Journal of Process Control 6 (1996) 205-221
41. Banerjee A., and Arkun Y. Control configuration design applied to the Tennessee Eastman plant-wide control problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering 19 (1995) 453-480
42. Larsson T., Hestetun K., Hovland E., and Skogestad S. Self-optimizing control of a large-scale plant: the Tennessee Eastman process. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 40 (2001) 4889-4901
43. Luyben W.L. Simple regulatory control of the Eastman process. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 35 (1996) 3280-3289
44. Lyman R.R., and Georgakis C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering 19 (1995) 321-331
45. McAvoy T.J., and Ye N. Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering 18 (1994) 383-413
46. Sriniwas G.R., and Arkun Y. Control of the Tennessee Eastman process using input-output models. Journal of Process Control 7 (1997) 387-400
47. D.R. Vinson, C. Georgakis, J. Fossy, Studies in plant-wide controllability using the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem, the case for multivariable control, in: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, USA, 1995, pp. 250-254.
48. Seider W.D., Seader J.D., and Lewin D.R. Product and process design principles. second ed. (2004), John Wiley and Sons Inc., USA
49. Optimization toolbox, for use with MATLAB. Version 3, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA, 2006.
50. Nocedal J., and Wright S.J. Numerical Optimization. second ed. (2006), Springer, USA
51. Ricker N.L. Optimal steady-state operation of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Computers & Chemical Engineering 19 (1995) 949-959