Multiecho IDEAL gradient-echo water-fat separation for rapid assessment of cartilage volume at 1.5 T: Initial experience

Radiology

Volumn 252, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 561-567

  Chen, Christina A ^a   Lu, Wenmiao ^b   John, Chand T ^b   Hargreaves, Brian A ^a   Reeder, Scott B ^c   Delp, Scott L ^b   Siston, Robert A ^d   Gold, Garry E ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAT; WATER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; KNEE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYNOVIAL FLUID; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; BODY WATER; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY WATER; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; WATER;

EID: 70249134935     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2522081424     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, Kelsey JL, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of selected arthritic and musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. J Rheumatol 1989;16:427-441. (Pubitemid 19149397)
2. Arden N, Nevitt MC. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20:3-25.
3. Disler DG, Recht MP, McCauley TR. MR imaging of articular cartilage. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29:367-377.
4. McCauley TR, Disler DG. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:2-8.
5. Sangha O. Epidemiology of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39(suppl 2):3-12.
6. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:127-132.
7. Mosher TJ, Pruett SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:178-182.
8. Reeder SB, Wen Z, Yu H, et al. Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:35-45. (Pubitemid 38095700)
9. Glover GH. Multipoint Dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:521-530.
10. Pineda AR, Reeder SB, Wen Z, Pelc NJ. Cramer-Rao bounds for three-point decomposition of water and fat. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:625-635. (Pubitemid 41233757)
11. Gold GE, Reeder SB, Yu H, et al. Articular cartilage of the knee: rapid three-dimensional MR imaging at 3.0 T with IDEAL balanced steady-state free precession - initial experience. Radiology 2006;240:546-551. (Pubitemid 44098653)
12. Siepmann DB, McGovern J, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1510-1515. (Pubitemid 350174823)
13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502.
14. Yu H, Reeder SB, Shimakawa A, Brittain JH, Pelc NJ. Field map estimation with a region growing scheme for iterative 3-point water-fat decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1032-1039. (Pubitemid 41457077)
15. Kijowski R, Passov L, Shimakawa A, Yu H, Reeder S. Unspoiled Gradient Recalled-Echo Acquired in the Steady-State (GRASS) with IDEAL fat-suppression for high resolution cartilage imaging at 3T [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2007; 3819.
16. Chen CA, John CT, Hargreaves BA, et al. Multi-echo IDEAL-GRE water-fat separation for rapid assessment of cartilage morphology [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2007; 2618.
17. Sekihara K. Steady-state magnetizations in rapid NMR imaging using small flip angles and short repetition intervals. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1987;6:157-164. (Pubitemid 17614877)
18. Frahm J, Haase A, Matthaei D. Rapid NMR imaging of dynamic processes using the FLASH technique. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:321-327. (Pubitemid 16112953)
19. Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:1433-1441.
20. Eckstein F, Schnier M, Haubner M, et al. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;352:137-148. (Pubitemid 28326293)
21. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Asbeutah A, Morris K, Stuckey S. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 2000;18:580-584. (Pubitemid 30786591)
22. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stuckey S. Gender differences in knee cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999;7:265-271. (Pubitemid 29244100)
23. Eckstein F, Westhoff J, Sittek H, et al. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:593-597.
24. Marshall KW, Mikulis DJ, Guthrie BM. Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction. J Orthop Res 1995;13:814-823.
25. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994;192:485-491. (Pubitemid 24233932)
26. Hardya PA, Newmark R, Liu YM, et al. The influence of the resolution and contrast on measuring the articular cartilage volume in magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:965-972.
27. McKenzie C, Reeder S, Shimakawa A, Pelc N, Brittain J. Abdominal three point Dixon imaging with self calibrating parallel MRI [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004; 917.
28. Reeder SB, Hargreaves BA, Yu H, Brittain JH. Homodyne reconstruction and IDEAL waterfat decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:586-593. (Pubitemid 41233753)
29. Yu H, McKenzie CA, Shimakawa A, et al. Multiecho reconstruction for simultaneous water-fat decomposition and T2* estimation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1153-1161. (Pubitemid 47548182)
30. Piplani MA, Disler DG, McCauley TR, Holmes TJ, Cousins JP. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Radiology 1996;198:855-859.