The business value of process sharing in supply chains: A study of rosettanet

International Journal of Electronic Commerce

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 115-146

  Chang, Hsin Lu ^a   Shaw, Michael J ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Business value of IT; Electronic commerce; Interorganizational information systems; Process sharing; Supply chain collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249127301     PISSN: 10864415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415140104     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Armstrong, J.S., and Overton, T.S. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing research, 14, 3 (1977), 396-402.
2. Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 1 (1991), 99-120.
3. Barua, A.; Konana, P.; and Whinston, A.B. An empirical investigation of Net-enabled business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (2004), 585-620.
4. Barua, A.C.; Kriebel, T.; and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technology and business value: An analytical and empirical investigation. Information Systems research, 6, 1 (1995), 3-23.
5. Bollen, K., and Leenox, R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 2 (1991), 305-314.
6. Brnjolfsson, E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the aCM, 36, 12 (1993), 66-77.
7. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems. Management Science, 42, 4 (1996), 541-558.
8. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the aCM, 41, 8 (1998), 49-55.
9. Byrd, T.A., and Turner, E.D. An exploratory analysis of the information technology infrastructure fexibility construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 1 (2000), 167-208.
10. Chatfeld, A.T., and Yetton, P. Strategic payoff from EDI as a function of EDI embeddedness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (2000) 195-224.
11. Chatterjee, D.D.; Segars, A.H.; and Watson, R.T. Realizing the promise of e-business: Developing and leveraging electronic partnering options. California Management review, 48, 4 (2006), 60-83.
12. Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulieds (ed.), Modern Methods for Business research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 295-336.
13. Chin, W.W.; Barbara L.M.; and Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/ adoption study. Information Systems research, 14, 2 (2003), 189-217.
14. Clemons, E., and Row, M. Information technology and industrial cooperation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 2 (1992), 9-28.
15. Clemons, E., and Row, M. Limits to interfrm coordination through information technology: Results of a feld study in consumer packaged good distribution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 1 (1993), 73-95.
16. Davenport, T. Process Innovation: reengineering work through Information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
17. Day, G.S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58 (October 1994), 37-52.
18. Diamantopoulos, A., and Siguaw, J. Formative versus refective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 4 (2006), 263-282.
19. Duncan, N.B. Capturing fexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 2 (1995), 37-57.
20. Dutta, A., and Roy, R. A process-oriented framework for justifying information technology projects in e-business environment. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 1 (fall 2004), 49-68.
21. Dyer, J.H., and Singh, H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. academy of Management review, 23, 4 (1998), 660-679.
22. Gebauer, J., and Buxmann, P. Assessing the value of interorganizational systems to support business transactions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 4, 4 (summer 2000), 61-82.
23. Grant, R.M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. organization Science, 7, 4 (1996), 375-387.
24. Grover, V. ; Teng, J.; Segars, A.H.; and Fiedler, K. The infuence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: The IS executives perspective. Information and Management, 34, 3 (1998), 141-159.
25. Gosain, S.; Malhotra, A.; and Sawy, O.A. Coordinating for fexibility in e-business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 3 (2005), 7-45.
26. Gosain, S.; Malhotra, A.; Sawy, O.A.; and Chehade, F. The impact of common e-business interfaces. Communications of the aCM, 46, 12 (2003), 186-194
27. Harmon, P. Business Process Change. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffmann, 2003.
28. Hart, P., and Saunders, C. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the suppliers perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 4 (1998), 87-111.
29. Iacovou, C.; Benbasat, I.; and Dexter, A. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 465-485.
30. Jarvis, C.B.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Podsakoff, P.M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecifcation in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer research, 30, 2 (2003), 199-218.
31. Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. translating Strategy into action: the Balanced Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
32. Kauffman, R.J.; McAndrews, J.J.; and Wang, Y.M. Opening the black box of network externalities in network adoption. Information Systems research, 11, 1 (2000), 61-82.
33. Kim, K.K., and Umanath, N.S. Information transfer in B2B procurement: An empirical analysis and measurement. Information and Management, 42, 6 (2005), 813-828.
34. Kohli, R. In search of information technology business value: Do measurement levels make a difference? In J. Ross and D. Galletta (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th americas Conference on Information Systems. Tampa: Association for Information Systems, 2003, pp. 1465-1468.
35. Kumar, K., and Van Dissel, H. Sustainable collaboration: Managing confict and cooperation in interorganizational systems. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1996), 279-300.
36. Lavie, D. The competitive advantage of interconnected frms: An extension of the resource-based view. academy of Management review, 31, 3 (2006), 638-658.
37. Lee, H.L. Creating value through supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management review, 4, 4 (September/October 2000), 30-36.
38. Lee, H.L. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business review, 82, 10 (October 2004), 102-112.
39. Madhok, A., and Tallman, S.B. Resources, transactions and tents: Managing value through interfrm collaborative relationships. organization Science, 9, 3 (1998), 326-339.
40. Mahmood, M.A.; Kohli, R.; and Devaraj, S. Introduction to the special issue: Measuring the business value of information technology in e-business environments. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 1 (fall 2004), 5-8.
41. Markus, M.L.; Steinfeld, C.W.; and Wigand, R.T. Industry-wide information systems standardization as collection action: The case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry. MIS Quarterly, 30 (2006), 439-465.
42. Mata, F.J.; Fuerst, W.L.; and Barney, J.B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 487-505.
43. McFarlan, W.F., and Belokhvostova, V. RosettaNet and ebXML: Betting on the right eBusiness standard. Harvard Business School Case #9-305-1006, most recent revision date: March 20, 2006.
44. Melville, N.; Kraemer, K.; and Gurbaxani, V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (2004), 283-322.
45. Mooney, J.G.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Kraemer, K.L. A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. data BaSE for advances in Information Systems, 27, 2 (1996), 68-81.
46. Mukhopadhyay, T., and Kekre, S. Strategic and operational benefts of electronic integration in B2B procurement processes. Management Science, 48, 10 (2002), 1301-1313.
47. Mukhopadhyay, T.; Kekre, S.; and Kalathur, S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly, 19, 2 (1995), 137-156.
48. Newbert, S. Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the frm. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 7 (2008), 745-768.
49. Orton, J.D., and Weick, K.E. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptual-ization. academy of Management review, 15, 2 (1990) 203-223.
50. Patnayakuni, R.; Rai, A.; and Seth, N. Relational antecedents of information fow integration for supply chain coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 1 (2006), 13-49.
51. Peleg, B. STMicroelectronic e-chain optimization project: Achieving streamlined operations through collaborative forecasting and inventory management. Global Supply Chain Management Forum, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case GS-36, 2004.
52. Petter, S.; Straub, D.; and Rai, A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 623-656.
53. Piccoli, G., and Ives, B. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29, 4 (2005), 747-776.
54. Podsakoff, P.M., and Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 4, (1986), 531-544.
55. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Lee, J. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879-903.
56. Rai, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; and Seth, N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30, 2 (2006), 225-246.
57. Ranganathan, C.; Dhaliwal, J.S.; and Teo, T.S. Assimilation and diffusion of Web technologies in supply-chain management: An examination of key drivers and performance impacts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 1 (fall 2004), 127-161.
58. Reimers, K. Standardizing the new e-business platform: Learning from the EDI experience. Electronic Markets, 11, 4 (2001), 231-237. RosettaNet. RosettaNet implementation framework: Core specifcation. Santa Ana, CA, 2000.
59. Sabath, R.E., and Fontanella, J. The unfulflled promise of supply chain collaboration. Supply Chain Management review, 6, 4 (July/August 2002), 24-29.
60. Sambamurthy, V.; Bharadway, A.; and Grover, V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary frms. MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 (2003), 237-263.
61. Smith, H.A., and Mckeen, J.D. Developments in practice VII: Developing and delivering IT value proposition. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 11 (2003), 438-450.
62. Sol, C., and Markus, M.L. How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. In G. Ariav, C. Beath, J.I. DeGross, R. Hoyer, and C. Kemerer (eds.), Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Information Systems. Amsterdam: Association for Information Systems, 1995, pp. 29-41.
63. Standing, C., and Lin, C. Organizational evaluation of the benefts, constraints, and satisfaction of business-to-business electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 3 (spring 2007), 107-134.
64. Subramani, M. How do suppliers beneft from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28, 1 (2004), 45-73.
65. Subramaniam, C., and Shaw, M.J. A study of the value and impact of B2B e-commerce: The case of Web-based procurement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 4 (summer 2002), 19-40.
66. Tallon, P.; Kraemer, P. ; Kenneth, L.; and Gurbazani, V. Executives perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (2000), 145-173.
67. Tan, M., and Raman, K. Interorganizational systems and transformation of interorganizational relationships: A relational perspective. In L. Apple-gate and R. Galliers (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems. Barcelona: Association for Information Systems, 2002, pp. 877-884.
68. Tippins, M.J., and Sohi, R.S. IT competency and frm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24, 8 (2003), 745-761.
69. Wang, E.T.; Tai, J.C.; and Wei, H. A virtual integration theory of improved supply-chain performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 2 (2006), 41-64.
70. Wareham, J.; Rai, A.; and Pickering, G. Standardization in vertical industries: An institutional analysis of XML-based standards infusion in electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 15, 4 (2005), 323-334.
71. Williams, L.J.; Cote, J.A.; and Buckley, M.R. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of applied Psychology, 74, 3 (1989), 462-468.
72. Zhu, K., and Kraemer, K.L. Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations. Information Systems research, 16, 1 (2005), 61-84.
73. Zwass, V. Electronic commerce and organizational innovation: Aspects and opportunities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3 (spring 2003), 7-37.