Interdependence, density dependence, and networks in politics

American Politics Research

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 921-950

  Huckfeldt, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Density dependence; Network communication; Networks; Social interaction; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249116106     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X09337462     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1964). Mathematical models of the distribution of attributes under controversy. In N. Fredriksen & H. Gulliksen (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology (pp. 142-160). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2. Abelson, R. P. (1979). Social clusters and opinion clusters. In P. W. Holland & S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Perspectives on social network research (pp. 239-256). New York: Academic Press.
3. Achen, C. H., & Shively, W. P. (1995). Cross-level inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Ahn, T. K., Isaac, R. M., & Salmon, T. C. (2008). Endogenous group formation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10, 171-194.
5. Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153-167.
6. Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 564-599.
7. Axelrod, R. (1997a). The complexity of cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Axelrod, R. (1997b). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 203-226.
9. Barabasi, A. (2002). Linked. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
10. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 151-170.
12. Boudon, R. (1986). Theories of social change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1955). Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley.
14. Butler, D., & Stokes, D. (1974). Political change in Britain. London: Macmillan.
15. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
16. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1966). Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley.
17. Centola, D. (2009). Failure in complex social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 33, 64-68.
18. Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 702-734.
19. Coleman, J. S. (1964). An introduction to mathematical sociology. New York: Free Press.
20. Dogan, M., & Rokkan, S. (1974). Social ecology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 728-744.
22. Erbring, L., & Young, A. A. (1979). Individuals and social structure: Contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods & Research, 7, 396-430.
23. Eulau, H. (1963). The behavioral persuasion in politics. New York: Random House.
24. Eulau, H. (1989). Micro-macro dilemmas in political science: Personal pathways through complexity. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
25. Finifter, A. (1974). The friendship group as a protective environment for political deviants. American Political Science Review, 68, 607-625.
26. Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis, 28, 454-465.
27. Fowler, J. H., Baker, L. A., & Dawes, C. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review, 102, 233-248.
28. Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 266-297.
29. Francisco, R. A. (2004). After the massacre: Mobilization in the wake of harsh repression. Mobilization, 9, 107-126.
30. Gamm, G. (1999). Urban exodus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Giles, M. W., & Dantico, M. (1981). Political participation and neighborhood social context revisited. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 144-150.
32. Goodman, L. (1953). Ecological regressions and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 18, 663-666.
33. Goodman, L. (1959). Some alternatives to ecological correlation. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 610-624.
34. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
35. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420-1443.
36. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
37. Handcock, M. S. (2003). Statistical models for social networks: Inference and degeneracy. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis (pp. 229-240). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Nelson, R. L., & Salisbury, R. H. (1993). The hollow core. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Hoff, P. D. (2003). Random effects models for network data. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis (pp. 303-312). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
40. Hoff, P. D., & Ward, M. D. (2004). Modeling dependencies in international relations networks. Political Analysis, 12, 160-175.
41. Huckfeldt, R. (1979). Political participation and the social contexts of urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Political Science, August, 579-592.
42. Huckfeldt, R. (1983a). Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: Environmental constraints on friendship choice. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 651-669.
43. Huckfeldt, R. (1983b). The social context of political change: Durability, volatility and social influence. American Political Science Review, December, 929-944.
44. Huckfeldt, R. (1989). Noncompliance and the limits of coercion: The problematic enforcement of unpopular laws. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 13, 533-546.
45. Huckfeldt, R. (1990). Structure, indeterminacy, and chaos: A case for sociological law. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 413-433.
46. Huckfeldt, R. (2001). The social communication of political expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 425-438.
47. Huckfeldt, R. (2009). Citizenship in democratic politics: Density dependence and the micro-macro divide. In M. I. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure (pp. 291-313). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Huckfeldt, R., Ikeda, K., & Pappi, F. (2005). Patterns of disagreement in democratic politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 497-514.
49. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Huckfeldt, R., & Kohfeld, C. (1989). Race and the decline of class in American politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
51. Huckfeldt, R., & Kohfeld, C. (1992). Electoral stability and the decline of class in democratic politics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 16, 223-239.
52. Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W. D., & Sprague, J. (1998). Election campaigns, social communication, and the accessibility of perceived discussant preference. Political Behavior, 20, 263-294.
53. Huckfeldt, R., Mayer, A. K., Ryan, J. B., & Ahn, T. K. (2008, April). Political experts and the collective enhancement of civic capacity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Annual National Conference, Chicago, IL.
54. Huckfeldt, R., & Mendez, J. M. (2008). Moths, flames, and political engagement: Managing disagreement within communication networks. Journal of Politics, 70, 83-96.
55. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Jackson, M. O., & Yariv, L. (2007). Diffusion of behavior and equilibrium properties in network games. American Economic Review, 97, 92-98.
57. Jennings, K. M., & Niemi, R. G. (1974). The political character of adolescence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Johnson, P. E., & Huckfeldt, R. (2005). Agent-based explanations for the survival of disagreement in social networks. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 251-268). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
59. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: Free Press.
60. Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.
61. Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsukuba, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Laumann, E. O. (1973). Bonds of pluralism. New York: Free Press.
63. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people's choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
64. Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 266-297.
65. Lubell, M., & Scholz, J. T. (2001). Cooperation, reciprocity, and the collective action heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 160-178.
66. MacKuen, M. B. (1990). Speaking of politics: Individual conversational choice, public opinion and the prospects for deliberative democracy. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 59-99). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
67. Matthews, D. R., & Prothro, J. W. (1966). Negroes and the new southern politics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
68. May, R. (1973). Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press.
69. May, R. (1974). Biological populations with nonoverlapping generations: Stable points, stable cycles, and chaos. Science, 186, 645-647.
70. May, R. (1975). Biological populations obeying difference equations: Stable points, stable cycles, and chaos. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 49, 511-524.
71. May, R. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459-467.
72. May, R., & Leonard, W. (1975). Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 29, 243-253.
73. May, R., & Oster, G. (1976). Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. American Naturalist, 110, 573-599.
74. Maynard Smith, J. (1968). Mathematical ideas in biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75. Maynard Smith, J. (1974). Models in ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76. McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining the effect of disagreement and expertise in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 737-754.
77. McPhee, W. N. (1963). Formal theories of mass behavior. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
78. McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 370-379.
79. Miller, W. E. (1956). One party politics and the voter. American Political Science Review, 50, 707-725.
80. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
81. Mondak, J. J. (2009). Enduring differences: Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois.
82. Nickerson, D. (2008). Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. American Political Science Review, 102, 49-57.
83. Page, S. E. (2007). The difference. Princeton University Press.
84. Przeworski, A. (1974). Contextual models of political behavior. Political Methodology, 1, 27-61.
85. Przeworski, A., & Sprague, J. (1986). Paper stones: A history of electoral socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. Putnam, R. D. (1966). Political attitudes and the local community. American Political Science Review, 60, 640-654.
87. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
88. Schelling, T. (1978). Micro motives and macro behavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
89. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90. Scholz, J., & Wang, C. (2006). Cooptation or transformation? Local policy networks and federal regulatory enforcement. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 81-97.
91. Segal, D. R., & Meyer, M. W. (1974). The social context of political partisanship. In M. Dogan & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Social ecology (pp. 217-232). Cambridge: MIT Press.
92. Shively, W. P. (1969). Ecological inference: The use of aggregate data to study individuals. American Political Science Review, 63, 1183-1196.
93. Siegel, D. A. (2009). Social networks and collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 122-138.
94. Signorino, C. S. (2003). Structure and uncertainty in discrete choice models. Political Analysis, 11, 316-344.
95. Signorino, C. S., & Yilmaz, K. (2003). Strategic misspecificaiton in regression models. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 551-556.
96. Simon, H. (1996). Sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
97. Sprague, J. (1976). Estimating a Boudon type contextual model: some practical and theoretical problems of measurement. Political Methodology, 3, 333-353.
98. Tingsten, H. (1937). Political behavior: Studies in election statistics (V. Hammarling, Trans.). London: P. S. King.
99. Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795.
100. Ward, M. D., Hoff, P. D., & Lofdahl, C. L. (2003). Identifying international networks: Latent spaces and imputation. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modeling and analysis (pp. 345-359). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
101. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
102. Watts, D. J. (2004). The new science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243-270.
103. White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730-780.
104. Wright, G. C. (1976). Community structure and voter decision making in the south. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 201-215.