The realist approach to explanatory mechanisms in social science: More than a Heuristic?

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 440-462

  Demetriou, Chares ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Charles Tilly; Mario Bunge; Mechanisms; Roy Bhaskar; Social scientific explanations

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249099270     PISSN: 00483931     EISSN: 15527441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0048393108329268     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bennet, A. 2003. Beyond Hempel and back to Hume: Causal mechanisms and causal explanation. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual conference, Philadelphia, 28 August 2003.
2. Bhaskar, R. 1978. A realist theory of science. Sussex: Harvester.
3. Bhaskar, R. 1979. The possibility of naturalism. Sussex: Harvester.
4. Bhaskar, R. 1986. Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso.
5. Bourdieu, P., and L.D. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Brante, T. 2001. Consequences of realism for sociological theory-building. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 31 (2): 167-95.
7. Bunge, M. 1996. Finding philosophy in social science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Bunge, M. 1997. Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4): 410-65.
9. Bunge, M. 2004a. How does it work? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 182-210.
10. Bunge, M. 2004b. Clarifying some misunderstandings about social systems and their mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3): 371-81.
11. Collier, A. 1994. Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar's philosophy. London: Verso.
12. Diani, Mario. 2007. The relational element in Charles Tilly's recent (and not so recent) work. Social Networks 29 (2): 316-23.
13. Earl, J. 2008. An admirable call to improve, but not fundamentally change, our collective methodological practices. Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 355-59.
14. Hedstrom, P., and R. Swedberg. 1998. Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kontopoulos, K. 1993. The logics of social structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Koopmans, R. 2003. A failed revolution-But a worthy cause. Mobilization 8:116-19.
17. Lichbach, M.I. 2008. Modeling mechanisms of contention: McTT's positivist constructivism. Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 345-54.
18. Mahoney, J. 2003. Tentative answers to questions about causal mechanisms. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual conference, Philadelphia, 28 August 2003.
19. Manicas, P. 2006. A realist philosophy of social science: Explanation and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mayntz, R. 2004. Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 237-59.
21. McAdam, D. 2003. Eehh, what's up (with) DOC? Clarifying the program. Mobilization 8:126-34.
22. McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. McAdam, D. 2007. Comparative perspectives on contentious politics. In Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure: Advancing theory in comparative politics, edited by M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. McAdam, D. 2008. Methods for measuring mechanisms of contention. Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 307-31.
25. Norkus, Z. 2005. Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the "mechanismic approach" in social science and history. History and Theory 44:348-72.
26. Oliver, P. 2003. Mechanisms of contention. Mobilization 8:119-22.
27. Reiss, Julian. 2007. Do we need mechanisms in the social sciences? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2): 163-84.
28. Rescher, N. 1996. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
29. Rucht, D. 2003. Overcoming the classical model? Mobilization 8:112-16.
30. Sawyer, K. 2004. The mechanism of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 260-82.
31. Sayer, A. 1992. Method in social science: A realist approach. New York: Routledge.
32. Steinmetz, G. 1998. Critical realism and historical sociology. Comparative Studies in Society and History 40:170-86.
33. Tarrow, S. 2003. Confessions of a recovering structuralist. Mobilization 8:134-41.
34. Tarrow, S. 2005. The new transnational activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Tilly, C. 1998. Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Tilly, C. 2001. Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science 4:21-41.
37. Tilly, C. 2003. The politics of collective violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tilly, C. 2005. Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
39. Tilly, C. 2008. Explaining social processes. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
40. Tilly, C., and S. Tarrow. 2007. Contentious politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
41. Wight, C. 2004. Theorizing the mechanism of conceptual and semiotic space. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 283-99.