From Web accessibility to Web adaptability

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 212-226

  Kelly, Brian ^a   Nevile, Liddy ^b   Sloan, David ^c   Fanou, Sotiris ^d   Ellison, Ruth ^e   Herrod, Lisa ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Accessibility; Usability; WAI; WCAG

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DISABLED PERSON; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; DISABLED PERSONS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70249097768     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17483100902903408     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Kelly B, Phipps L, Swift E. Developing a holistic approach for e-learning accessibility. Can J Learn Technol 2004;30. Available online at http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/ article/view/138/131.
2. Kelly B, Sloan D, Phipps L, Petrie H, Hamilton F. Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity? A framework for applying the WCAG in the real world. Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), Chiba, Japan, 10 May, 2005; New York: ACM Press. pp 46-54.
3. Sloan D, Kelly B, Heath A, Petrie H, Hamilton F, Phipps L. Contextual Web accessibility - Maximizing the benefit of accessibility guidelines. Conference Proceedings, Special Interest Tracks, Posters and Workshops (CD ROM). WWW 2006. 22-26 May, 2006; Edinburgh, Scotland.
4. Nevile L, Kelly B. Web accessibility 3.0: Learning from the past, planning for the future. ADDW08, 22-24 September, 2008; University of York.
5. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, United Nations. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.un.org/ disabilities/default.asp?navid1/ 412&pid1/4150.
6. W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, 5 May 1999. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.
7. W3C. User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, December 2002. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.w3.org/TR/ WAI-USERAGENT/.
8. W3C. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, February 2000. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.w3.org/TR/ WAI-AUTOOLS/.
9. The web: Access and inclusion for disabled people, DRC Formal Investigation report, 2004, Disability Rights Commission. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.equalityhuman rights.com/en/publicationsandresources/Pages/ webaccess.aspx.
10. W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, Recommendation 11 December 2007. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.
11. Sloan D, Kelly B, Heath A, Petrie H, Hamilton F, Phipps L. Contextual Web accessibility - Maximizing the benefit of accessibility guidelines. Conference Proceedings, Special Interest Tracks, Posters and Workshops (CD ROM). WWW 2006 Edinburgh, Scotland, 22-26 May 2006. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/papers/w4a-2006/.
12. Lilley C. HTML Reloaded. WWW 2007. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.w3.org/2007/Talks/Banff-WWW 2007-HTMLReloaded/index.html#(3
13. Marincu C, McMullin B. A Comparative Assessment of Web Accessibility and Technical Standards Conformance in Four EU States. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://firstmonday.org/ htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1160/ 1080.
14. Alexa Global Top 500 Validation Research, 4 August 2008, Blooberry. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://my.opera. com/operaqa/blog/2008/08/04/alexa- global-top-500-validationresearch.
15. Phipps L, Kelly B. Holistic approaches to e-learning accessibility. ALT-J Res Learn Technol 2006;14:69-78.
16. Nevile L, Treviranus J. Interoperability for individual learner centred accessibility for Web-based educational systems. IEEE TCLT's J Educ Technol Soc 2006;9:215-227.
17. Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Critical texts in social work and the welfare state, London: Macmillan Education; 1990.
18. Kelly B, Sloan D, Brown S, Seale J, Petrie H, Lauke P, Ball S. Accessibility 2.0: People, policies and processes. WWW 2007 Banff, Canada, 7-11 May 2007. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/papers/w4a- 2007.
19. Nevile L, Ford M. Location and access: Issues enabling accessibility of information. In: Cartwright W, Peterson M, Gartner G, editors. Multimedia cartography, 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007. ISBN 3-540-36650-4.
20. Cabinet Office. eAccessibility is an issue for all of us, 24 November 2005. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www. cabinetoffice.gov.uk/newsroom/news- releases/2005/051124- eaccessibility.aspx.
21. Wheeling in Second Life, YouTube. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v1/4CBlaiBV-yJs.
22. About Us. FLUID Project. Accessed 4 February 2009 http:// fluidproject.org/about-us/our-mission/.
23. AFB Blog. Thanks facebook, 29 January 2009. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.afb.org/blog/blog-comments.asp? TopicID1/43371.
24. Web Access Centre Blog. CAPTCHA - If your name's not down you're not coming in, 30 October 2007. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.rnib.org.uk/ wacblog/images/ captcha-if-youre-names-not-down-youre-not-coming-in/.
25. Newell A, Gregor P, Alm N. HCI for older and disabled people, in the Queen Mother Research Centre at Dundee University, Scotland. Proceedings of CHI, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 22-27 April, 2006; New York: ACM Press. pp 299-303.
26. Sloan D, Walker D. Evaluating the accessibility to disabled people of e-assessment tools. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Assessment (CAAC). 8-9 July, 2008; Loughborough, UK.
27. Nevile L. Adaptability and accessibility: A new framework. Proceedings of OZCHI 2005; Canberra, Australia, 23-25 November, 2005; ACM (the Association for Computing Machinery) Digital Library. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id1/41108368. 1108413&coll1/4ACM&dl1/ 4ACM&CFID1/424041543.
28. Nevile L. Anonymous Dublin core profiles for accessible user relationships with resources and services. Presented at DC 2005 Conference. http://purl.oclc.org/dcpapers/2005/paper09 (Later, republished as 2006 "Anonymous Dublin Core Profiles for Accessible User Relationships with Resources and Services" in New Technology of Library and Information Service, Vol. 1/2006 Serial No.132, pp. 17-24
29. Kelly K. Four stages in the internet of things. The Technium Online. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/ archives/2007/11/four- stages-in.php.
30. Treviranus J, Nevile L, Heath A. editors. ISO/IEC 24751-1 Information technology - Individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training, Part 1: Framework and reference model.ISO/IEC 24751-24761:2008.
31. Treviranus J, Nevile L, Heath A. editors. Information technology - Individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training, Part 2: "Access for all" personal needs and p for digital delivery. ISO/IEC 24751-24752:2008.
32. Treviranus J, Nevile L, Heath A. editors. Information technology - Individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training, Part 3: "Access for all" digital resource description. ISO/IEC 24751-24753:2008.
33. Bourda Y, Li Z. Information technology - Learning, education and training - Metadata for learning resources, Part 1: Framework (under development). ISO/IEC 19788-19791
34. DC Terms (DCMI Metadata Terms) DCMI Usage Board. 2008. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/. Last accessed 9 April 2009.
35. Fred's Head blog. ADA Changes: The New Definition of Disability, 25 February 2009. Accessed 20 February 2009 http://www.fredshead.info/2009/02/ada- changes-new-definitionof. html.
36. W3C. Policies Relating to Web Accessibility. Accessed 20 February 2009 http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/.
37. Facebook's turnaround on data-retention policy, Silicon Republic, 18 February 2009. Accessed 20 February 2009 http://siliconrepublic.com/news/ article/12307/digital-life/ facebooks-turnaround-on-data-retention-policy.
38. ISO/IEC JTC1 Special Working Group on Accessibility. Accessed20February2009 http://www.jtc1access.org/base.htm.
39. Falk O, Heblich S. Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons 2007;50:247-254.
40. Fischer G, Giaccardi E. Meta-design: A framework for the future of end user development. In: Lieberman H, Paterno F, Wulf V, editors. End user development: Empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2006. pp 427-458.
41. Fanou S. Web 2.0: Engaging those with learning disabilities. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on e-Learning - Agia Napa, Cyprus, 6-7 November, 2009. Reading, UK: Academic Publishing. 2009. p 354.
42. Herrod L. Deafness and the User Experience, A List Apart, 12 August 2008. Accessed 20 February 2009 http:// www.alistapart.com/articles/ deafnessandtheuserexperience.
43. Disability Discrimination Act 1992, Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/ Legislation/Act Compilation1.nsf/0/FC69105BAF504384CA2571400006FD 7F?OpenDocument.
44. Accessibility, Department of Finance and Deregulation, Australian Government. Accessed 4 February 2009 http:// webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/ Accessibility.
45. BSI PAS 78. Guide to good practice in commissioning accessible websites. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://www. bsi-global.com/en/Shop/Publication-Detail/? pid1/40000000000 30129227.
46. BSI. DRAFT Web accessibility - Building accessible experiences for disabled people - Code of practice. Accessed 4 February 2009 http://drafts.bsigroup.com/?i1/4245.