Advanced features of hierarchical component models

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 252, Issue , 2007, Pages 3-10

  Hnětynka, Petr ^a   Bures, Tomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Component models; Component runtime environment; Connectors; Dynamic architectures

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT APPLICATION; COMPONENT MODEL; DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUE; DYNAMIC ARCHITECTURE; HIERARCHICAL COMPONENT MODEL; MULTIPLE COMMUNICATION STYLES; RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS; SOFTWARE COMPONENT;

CONNECTORS (STRUCTURAL); HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 70249089218     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Aldrich, J., Chambers, C, Notkin, D.: Arch Java: Connecting Software Architecture to Implementation, Proceedings of ICSE 2002, Orlando, USA, May 2002
2. Allen, R. J.: A Formal Approach to Software Architecture, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, May 1997
3. Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Leclercq, M., Quema, V., Stefani, J.-B.: The Fractal Component Model and Its Support in Java, Software Practice and Experience, Special issue on Experiences with Auto-adaptive and Reconfigurable Systems, 36(11-12), 2006
4. B ures, T., Hnetynka, P., Plasil, F.: SOFA 2.0: Balancing Advanced Features in a Hierarchical Component Model, Proceedings of SERA 2006, Seattle, USA, IEEE CS, Aug 2006
5. Eclipse Modeling Framwork, http://www.eclipse.org/emf/
6. Enterprise Java Beans specification, version 2.1. Sun Microsystems, Nov 2003
7. Garlan, D.; Monroe, R. T.; Wile, D.: Acme: Architectural Description of Component-Based Systems, In Foundations of Component-Based Systems, Cambridge University Press, 2000
8. Hnetynka, P., Pise, M.: Hand-written vs. MOF-based Metadata Repositories: The SOFA Experience, Proceeding of ECBS 2004, Brno, Czech Republic, May 2004
9. Hnetynka, P., Plasil, F.: Dynamic Reconfiguration and Access to Services in Hierarchical Component Models, Proceedings of CBSE 2006, Vasteras, Sweden, LNCS 4063, Jun 2006
10. Hnetynka, P., Tuma, P.: Fighting Class Name Clashes in Java Component Systems, Proceedings of JMLC 2003, Klagenfurt, Austria, Aug 2003
11. Inverardi, P.; Wolf, A.L.: Formal Specification and Analysis of Software Architectures Using the Chemical Abstract Machine Model, Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 21, no. 4, Apr 1995
12. Magee, J.; Kramer, J.: Dynamic structure in software architectures, Proceedings of FSE'4, San Francisco, USA, Oct 1996
13. OMG: CORBA Components, v 3.0, OMG document formal/02-06-65, Jun 2002
14. van Ommering, R., van der Linden, F., Kramer, J., Magee, J., The Koala Component Model for Consumer Electronics Software, In IEEE Computer, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 78-85, Mar 2000
15. Plasil, F., Balek, D., Janecek, R.: SOFA/DCUP: Architecture for Component Trading and Dynamic Updating, Proceedings of ICCDS'98, Annapolis, Maryland, USA IEEE CS Press, May 1998
16. Plasil, F., Visnovsky, S.: Behavior Protocols for Software Components, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 28, no. 11, Nov 2002
17. Seinturier, L., Pessemier, N., Duchien, L., Coupaye, T.: A Component Model Engineered with Components and Aspects, CBSE'06, LNCS 4063, Jun 2006
18. Szyperski, C: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, Jan 2002
19. Wermelinger, M.; Fiadeiro, J. L.: A graph transformation approach to software architecture reconfiguration, Science of Computer Programming, Volume 44, Issue 2, Aug 2002