Dynamic reconfiguration and access to services in hierarchical component models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4063 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 352-359

  Hnětynka, Petr ^a   Plášil, František ^a,b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRACTALS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPONENT-BASED SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC RECONFIGURATIONS; HIERARCHICAL COMPONENT MODELS; SOA PARADIGM;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746402919     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11783565_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Aldrich, J., Chambers, C., Notkin, D.: ArchJava: Connecting Software Architecture to Implementation, Proceedings of ICSE 2002, Orlando, USA, May 2002
2. Allen, R.: A Formal Approach to Software Architecture, PhD thesis, CMU, 1997
3. Baumeister, H., Hacklinger, F., Hennicker, R., Knapp, A., Wirsing, M.: A Component Model for Architectural Programming, Proceedings of FACS'05, Macao, Oct 2005
4. Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Leclercq, M., Quema, V., Stefani, J. B.: An Open Component Model and Its Support in Java, Proceedings of CBSE 2004, Edinburgh, UK, May 2004
5. Chappell, D. A., Enterprise Service Bus, O'Reilly Media, Jun 2004
6. Enterprise Java Beans specification, version 2.1, Sun Microsystems, Nov 2003
7. Hnětynka, P., Píše, M.: Hand-written vs. MOF-based Metadata Repositories: The SOFA Experience, Proceedings of ECBS 2004, Brno, Czech Republic, IEEE CS, May 2004
8. Hnětynka, P., Plášil, F., Bureš, T., Mencl, V., Kapová, L.: SOFA 2.0 metamodel, Tech. Rep. 11/2005, Dept. of SW Engineering, Charles University, Prague, Dec 2005
9. Inverardi, P., Wolf, A. L.: Formal Specification and Analysis of Software Architectures Using the Chemical Abstract Machine Model, IEEE Trans. on Soft. Eng., v. 21, n. 4, 1995
10. Iribarne, L.: Web Components: A Comparison between Web Services and Software Components, Colombian Journal of Computation, Vol. 5, No. 1, Jun 2004
11. Julia, http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/fractal/
12. Lau, K.-K., Wang, Z.: A Taxonomy of Software Component Models, Proceedings of EUROMICRO-SEAA'05, Porto, Portugal, Sep 2005
13. Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Dynamic Structure in Software Architectures, Proceedings of FSE'4, San Francisco, USA, Oct 1996
14. Medvidovic, N.: ADLs and dynamic architecture changes, Joint Proceedings SIGSOFT 1996 Workshops, ACM Press, New York, USA, Oct 1996
15. OMG: CORBA Components, v 3.0, OMG document formal/02-06-65, Jun 2002
16. OMG: Deployment and Configuration of Component-based Distributed Applications Specification, OMG document ptc/05-01-07, Jan 2005
17. Plášil, F., Bálek, D., Janeček, R.: SOFA/DCUP: Architecture for Component Trading and Dynamic Updating, Proceedings of ICCDS'98, Annapolis, USA, IEEE CS, May 1998
18. SOFA prototype, http://sofa.objectweb.org/
19. nd edition, Addison-Wesley, Jan 2002
20. Taylor, R. N., et al: A Component- and Message-Based Architectural Style for GUI Software, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 6, Jun 1996
21. WebServices, http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/
22. Wells, G.: Coordination Languages: Back to the Future with Linda, Proceedings of WCAT'05, Glasgow, UK, Jul 2005
23. Wermelingera, M., Fiadeiro, J. L.: A graph transformation approach to software architecture reconfiguration, Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 44, Iss. 2, Aug 2002