Adaptively weighted association statistics

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 442-452

  LeBlanc, Michael ^a   Kooperberg, Charles ^a  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Association tests; Data adaptive; Gene environment interactions; Score tests

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70149115670     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20397     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barlogie B, Tricot G, Rasmussen E, Anaissie E, van Rhee F, Zangar M, Fassas A, Hollmig K, Pineda-Roman M, Shaughnessy J, Epstein J, Crowley J. 2006. Total therapy 2 without thalidomide in comparison with total therapy 1: role of intensified induction and posttransplantation consolidation therapies. Blood 107:2633-2638.
2. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont CA: Wadsworth, 1984.
3. Chatterjee N, Carroll R. 2005. Semiparametric maximum-likelihood estimation exploiting gene-environment independence in case-control studies. Biometrika 92:399-418.
4. Chatterjee N, Zeynep K, Moslehi R, Peters U, Wacholder S. 2006. Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Am J Hum Gen 79:1012-1016.
5. Clark C. 1961. The greatest of a finite set of random variables. Oper Res 9:145-162.
6. Dai JY, LeBlanc M, Kooperberg C. 2008. Semiparametric estimation exploiting covariate independence in two-phase randomized trials. Biometrics Published online, May 12.
7. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. 2004. Least angle regression. Ann Stat 32:407-451.
8. Friedman JH, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2000. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Ann Stat 28:337-407.
9. Freund Y, Shapire T. 1996. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference; pp 148-156.
10. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Bladé J, Boccadoro M, Child JA, Avet-Loiseau H, Kyle RA, Lahuerta JJ, Ludwig H, Morgan G, Powles R, Shimizu K, Shustik C, Sonneveld P, Tosi P, Turesson I, Westin J. 2005. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 23:3412-3420.
11. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: Springer.
12. Hauser ER, Watanabe RM, Duren WL, Bass MP, Langefeld CD, Boehnke M. 2004. Ordered subset analysis in genetic linkage mapping of complex traits. Genet Epidemiol 27:53-63.
13. Kooperberg C, LeBlanc M. 2008. Increasing the power of identifying gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 32:255-263.
14. Lin DY. 2005. An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies. Bioinformatics 21:781-787.
15. Marchini J, Donnelly P, Cardon LR. 2005. Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat Genet 37:413-417.
16. Tibshirani T. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 58:267-288.