2D shape decomposition based on combined skeleton-boundary features

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5359 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2008, Pages 682-691

  Zeng, Jingting ^a   Lakaemper, Rolf ^a   Yang, Xingwei ^a   Li, Xin ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2D SHAPE; DATA SETS; HUMAN PERCEPTION; HUMAN SUBJECTS; SHAPE BOUNDARIES; SHAPE DATA; SHAPE DECOMPOSITION;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DECOMPOSITION;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 70149090152     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89646-3_67     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Hoffman, D.D., Richards, W.: Parts of recognition. cognition 18, 65-96 (1984)
2. Latecki, L., Lakaemper, R.: Convexity rule for shape decomposition based on discrete contour evolution. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 73, 441-454 (1999)
3. Singh, M., Hoffman, D.D.: Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In: Shipley, T., Kellman, P. (eds.) From fragments to objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision, vol. 130, pp. 401-459 (2001)
4. Puff, D.T., Ebefiy, Z.D., Pizerzx, S.M.: Object-based interpolation via cores. In: Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 143-150 (1994)
5. Abe, K., Arcelli, C., Hisajima, T., Ibaraki, T.: Parts of planar shapes. Pattern Recognition 29, 1703-1711 (1996)
6. Hilaga, M., Shinagawa, Y., Kohmura, T., Kunii: Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3d shapes. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 203-212 (2001)
7. Shokoufandeh, A., Bretzner, L., Macrini, D., Demirci, M.F., Jonsson, C., Dickinson, S.: The representation and matching of categorical shape. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 103, 139-154 (2006)
8. Cohen, E.H., Singh, M.: Geometric determinants of shape segmentation: Tests using segment identification. Vision Research 47, 2825-2840 (2007)
9. Siddiqi, K., Kimia, B.B.: Parts of visual form: Computational aspects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17, 239-251 (1995)
10. Bai, X., Latecki, L.J., Liu, W.: Skeleton pruning by contour partitioning with discrete curve evolution. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29, 449-462 (2007)
11. Bai, X., Latecki, L.J.: Discrete skeleton evolution. In: The 6th International Conference on Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 4679, pp. 362-374 (2007)
12. Mi, X., DeCarlo, D.: Separating parts from 2d shapes using relatability. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1-8 (2007)
13. Reniers, D., Telea, A.: Skeleton-based hierarchical shape segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, pp. 179-188 (2007)
14. Tanase, M., Veltkamp, R.C.: Polygon decomposition based on the straight line skeleton. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual symposium on Computational geometry, pp. 58-67 (2003)
15. Prasad, L.: Rectification of the chordal axis transform and a new criterion for shape decomposition. In: Andrès, É., Damiand, G., Lienhardt, P. (eds.) DGCI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3429, pp. 263-275. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
16. Blum, H.: Biological shape and visual science. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38, 205-287 (1973)
17. Bai, X., Latecki, L.: Path similarity skeleton graph matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30 (2008)
18. Baseski, E., Erdem, A., Tari, S.: Dissimilarity between two skeletal trees in a context. Pattern Recognition (2008)