Separating parts from 2D shapes using relatability

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Mi, Xiaofeng ^a   DeCarlo, Doug ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; NEW MODEL;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER VISION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 50649086186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4409014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. J. August, K. Siddiqi, and S.W. Zucker. Ligature instabilities in the perceptual organization of shape. CVIU, 76(3):231-243, 1999.
2. H. Blum. Biological shape and visual science. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 38:205-287, 1973.
3. H. Blum and R. N. Nagel. Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features. Pattern Recognition, 10(3):167-180, 1978.
4. M. Brady and H. Asada. Smoothed local symmetries and their implementation. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 3:36-61, 1984.
5. J. De Winter and J. Wagemans. Segmentation of object outlines into parts: a large-scale integrative study. Cognition, 99(3):275-325, Apr 2006.
6. S. J. Dickinson, A. P. Pentland, and A. Rosenfeld. From volumes to views: an approach to 3-D object recognition. In IEEE Workshop on Directions in Automated CAD-Based Vision, pages 85-96, 1991.
7. P. J. Giblin and S. A. Brassett. Local symmetry of plane curves. The American Mathematical Monthly, 92(10):689-707, Dec 1985.
8. D. D. Hoffman and W. Richards. Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18(1-3):65-96, Dec 1984.
9. D. D. Hoffman and M. Singh. Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 63:29-78, 1997.
10. C. M. Hoffmann. Geometric and Solid Modeling: An Introduction. Morgan Kaufman, 1989.
11. P. J. Kellman and T. F. Shipley. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23:141-221, 1991.
12. B. B. Kimia, I. Frankel, and A. Popescu. Euler spiral for shape completion. IJCV, 54(1-3):157-180, 2003.
13. B. B. Kimia, A. R. Tannenbaum, and S. W. Zucker. Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: the components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space. IJCV, 15(3):189-224, Jul 1995.
14. J. J. Koenderink and A. J. van Doorn. The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception, 11:129-137, 1982.
15. I. Kovács and B. Julesz. Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes. Nature, 370:644-646, 1994.
16. L. J. Latecki and R. Lakmper. Convexity rule for shape decomposition based on discrete contour evolution. CVIU, 73(3):441-454, Mar 1999.
17. M. Leyton. Symmetry-curvature duality. CVGIP, 38:327-341, 1987.
18. W. E. Lorensen and H. E. Cline. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In SIGGRAPH 87, pages 163-169, NY, USA, 1987. ACM Press.
19. S. Muraki. Volumetric shape description of range data using "blobby model". In SIGGRAPH 1991, volume 25, pages 227-235, July 1991.
20. L. Prasad. Morphological analysis of shapes. CNLS Newsletter, 139, July 1997.
21. H. Rom and G. Medioni. Hierarchical decomposition and axial shape description. IEEE PAMI, 15(10):973-981, Oct 1993.
22. A. Rosenfeld. Axial representations of shape. CVGIP, 33(2):156-173, Feb 1986.
23. K. Siddiqi and B. B. Kimia. Parts of visual form: Computational aspects. IEEE PAMI, 17(3):239-251, 1995.
24. M. Singh and D. D. Hoffman. Completing visual contours: The relationship between relatability and minimizing inflections. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5):943-951, 1999.
25. M. Singh and D. D. Hoffman. Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In T. Shipley and P. Kellman, editors, From fragments to objects: segmentation and grouping in vision, Advances in Psychology, Vol. 130, pages 401-459. Elsevier, 2001.
26. M. Singh, G. D. Seyranian, and D. D. Hoffman. Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule. Perception & Psychophysics, 61:636-660, 1999.