Assessment of early maladaptive schemas: A psychometric study of the Turkish young schema questionnaire-short form-3

Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 75-84

  Soygüt, Gonca ^a   Karaosmanoǧlu, Alp ^a   Çakir, Zehra ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Reliability and validity; Schema assessment

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTMENT DISORDER; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PILOT STUDY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDATION STUDY;

ADJUSTMENT DISORDERS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TURKEY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70049109983     PISSN: 13002163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ball SA, Young JE (2000) Dual focus therapy for personality disorders and substance dependence: Case study results. Cognit & Behav Pract, 2: 270-281.
2. Baranoff J, Oei TPS, Cho SH et al. (2006) Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young schema questionnaire (short form) in Korean and Australian sample. J Affect Disord, 93: 133-140.
3. Batur S (2004) Yeme bozukluǧu gösterenlerde ve göstermeyenlerde temel bilişsel şemalar. Unpublished Dissertation. .Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
4. Bowlby J (1973) Attachment and Loss, Vol. I: Attachment. Australia: Pimlico
5. Calvete E, Estevez A, De Arrayobe EL et al.(2005) Schema questionnaire-short form: Structure and relationships with automatic thoughts and symptoms of affective disorders. EJPA, 21: 90-99.
6. Cecero JJ, Nelson JD, Gillie JM (2004) Tools and tenets of schema therapy: Toward the construct validity of the early maladaptive schema questionnaire-research version (EMSQ-R). Clin Psychol & Psychother, 11: 344-357.
7. Chevallet KL, Mauchnad P, Cottraux JC et al. (2006). Factor analysis of the schema questionnaire-short form in a non-clinical sample. J Cognit Psychother: An International Quarterly, 20: 311-318.
8. Daǧ İ (1991) Belirti tarama listesi (SCL-90-R)'nin üniversite öǧrencileri için güvenirliǧi ve geçerliǧi. Türk Psikiyatri Derg, 2: 5-12.
9. Daǧ İ (2000) Belirti tarama listesi (SCL-90-R). Psikiyatride Kullani{dotless}lan Klinik Ölçekler Aydemir Ö, Köroǧlu E (Ed), Ankara. Hekimler Yayi{dotless}n Birliǧi, s. 33-40.
10. Glaser BA, Campell LF, Calhoun GB et al. (2002) The early maladaptive schema questionnaire-short form: A construct validity. Measure & Eval Counsel & Dev, 35: 113-140.
11. Hammen C (1992) Biliş ve Psikodinamik: Ili{dotless}mli{dotless} bir öneri (Çev. Ş Tümer, E Düzen). Türk Psikoloji Derg, 27: 27-32.
12. Hoffart A, Sexton H, Hendley LM et al. (2006) The structure of maladaptive schemas: A confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of derived scales. Cognit Ther Res, 29: 627-644.
13. Lee CW, Taylor G, Dunn J (1999) Factor structure of schema questionnaire in a large clinical sample. Cognit Ther Res, 23: 441- 451.
14. Rijkeboer MM, Van Der Bergh H, Van Den Bout J (2005) Stability and discriminative power of the Young schema questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non- clinical population. J Behav Ther & Exp Psyhiat, 36: 129-144.
15. Safran J (l990) Towards a refinement of cognitive therapy in light of interpersonal theory: I.theory. Clin Psychol Rev, 10: 87-105.
16. Safran JD (1998) Widening the scope of cognitive therapy: The therapeutic relationship, emotion, and the process of change. New Jersey. Jason Aronson Inc, s.39.
17. Sari{dotless}taş D (2007) The effects of maternal acceptance- rejection on psychological adjustment of adolescents: The mediator roles of cognitive styles. Unpublished Master Thesis. Ankara: Orta Doǧu Teknik Üniversitesi.
18. Schmidt NB, Joiner TE, Joung JE et al. (1995) The schema questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognit Ther Res, 19: 295- 321.
19. Sezgin N (1996) The normative study of schema questionnaire on Turkish university students: A pilot study. 26 th Congress of European Association for Behaviour and Cognitive Therapy, Budapest, Hungary.
20. Sezgin N (1997) The factor study of schema questionnaire on a Turkish sample. Fifth European Congress of Psychology, Dublin: Ireland, Abstract book, s. 63.
21. Stopa L, Thorne P, Waters A et al. (2001) Are the short and long forms of the Young schema questionnaire comparable and how well-does each version predict psychopathology scores? J Cognit Ther: An International Quarterly, 15: 253-272.
22. Waller G, Meyer C, Ohanian V (2001) Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young schema questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognit Ther Res, 25: 137-147.
23. Welburn K, Corstine M, Dagg P et al. (2002) The schema questionnaire-short form: Factor analysis and relationships between schemas and symptoms. Cognit Ther Res, 26: 519-530.
24. Young J, Lindemann M (1992) An integrative schema-focused model for personality disorders. J Cognit Psychother, 6: 11-23.
25. Young J (1990) Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema -focused approach. Sarasota, FL. Professional Resource Pres, s.9.
26. Young J (1991) Early maladaptive schemas. Unpublished manuscript.
27. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME (2003) Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. New York. The Guilford Pres, s.7.