Construction of nested space-filling designs

Annals of Statistics

Volumn 37, Issue 6 A, 2009, Pages 3616-3643

  Qian, Peter Z G ^a   Ai, Mingyao ^b   Wu, C F Jeff ^c  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer experiments; Design of experiments; Difference matrices; Landomized orthogonal arrays; Oa based latin hypercubes; Orthogonal arrays; Wang Wu method

Indexed keywords

EID: 70049098145     PISSN: 00905364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/09-AOS690     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Addelman, S. and KEMPTHORNE, O. (1961). Some main-effect plans and orthogonal arrays of strength two. Ann. Math. Statist. 32 1167-1176. MR0137244
2. Bayarri, M.J., Berger, J. O., Cafeo, J., Garcia-Donato, G., Liu, F., Palomo, J., Parthasarathy, R. J., Paulo, R., Sacks, J. and Walsh, D. (2007). Computer model validation with functional output. Ann. Statist. 35 1874-1906. MR2363956
3. Bose, R.C. and Bush, K. A. (1952). Orthogonal arrays of strength two and three. Ann. Math. Statist. 23 508-524. MR0051204
4. BUTLER, N. A. (2001). Optimal and orthogonal Latin hypercube designs for computer experiments. Biometrika 88 847-857. MR1859414
5. Dalal, S. R. and Mallows, C. L. (1998). Factor-covering designs for testing software. Technometrics 40 234-243.
6. FANG, K.T., LI, R.Z. and Sudjianto, A. (2006). Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York. MR2223960
7. FANG, K.T., LIN, D.K.J., Winker, P. and Zhang, Y. (2000). Uniform design: Theory and application. Technometrics 42 237-248. MR1801031
8. GOLDSTEIN, M. and ROUGIER, J. (2004). Probabilistic formulations for transferring inferences from mathematical models to physical systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 467-487. MR2116356
9. Hedayat, A. S., Sloane, N.J.A. and STUFKEN, J. (1999). Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York. MR1693498
10. Hedayat, A.S., Stufken, J. and Su, G. (1996). On difference schemes and orthogonal arrays of strength t. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 56 307-324. MR1436014
11. HlGDON, D., KENNEDY, M. C., CAVENDISH, J. C., Cafeo, J. A. and RYNE, R. D. (2004). Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 448-466. MR2116355
12. JOHNSON, D. M., Dulmage, A. L. and MENDELSOHN, N. S. (1961). Orthomorphisms of groups and orthogonal Latin squares. I. Canad. J. Math. 13 356-372. MR0124229
13. KENNEDY, M. C. and O'Hagan, A. (2000). Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87 1-13. MR1766824
14. KENNEDY, M. C. and O'Hagan, A. (2001). Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 63 425-464. MR1858398
15. LAM, R.L.H., Welch, W. J. and YOUNG, S. S. (2002). Uniform coverage designs for molecule selection. Technometrics 44 99-109. MR1951721
16. LEARY, S., Bhaskar, A. and KEANE, A. (2003). Optimal orthogonal-array- based Latin hypercubes. J. Appl. Statist. 30 585-598. MR1969503
17. LOH, W. L. (1996a). A combinatorial central limit theorem for randomized orthogonal array sampling designs. Ann. Statist. 24 1209-1224. MR1401845
18. LOH, W. L. (1996b). On Latin hypercube sampling. Ann. Statist. 24 2058-2080. MR1421161
19. LOH, W. L. (2008). A multivariate central limit theorem for randomized orthogonal array sampling designs in computer experiments. Ann. Statist. 36 1983-2023. MR2435462
20. McKay, M.D., Beckman, R. J. and Conover, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 239-245. MR0533252
21. Niederreiter, H. (1992). Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods.SIAM, Philadelphia, PA. MR1172997
22. Oberkampf, W.L. and Trucano, T. (2007). Verification and Validation Benchmarks. Sandia National Laboratories (SAND 2007-0853), Albuquerque, New Mexico.
23. Owen, A. B. (1992). Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization. Statist. Sinica 2 439-452. MR1187952
24. Owen, A. B. (1994a). Lattice sampling revisited: Monte Carlo variance of means over randomized orthogonal arrays. Ann. Statist. 22 930-945. MR1292549
25. Owen, A. B. (1994b). Controlling correlations in Latin hypercube samples. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 1517-1522.
26. Qian, Z., Seepersad, C. C., Roshan, V. R., Allen, J. K. and Wu, C. F. J. (2006). Building surrogate models based on detailed and approximate simulations. ASME Transactions: J. Mechanical Design 128 668-677.
27. Qian, P.Z.G., Tang, B. and Wu, C. F. J. (2009). Nested space-filling designs for computer experiments with two levels of accuracy. Statist. Sinica 19 287-300. MR2487890
28. Qian, P.Z.G. and Wu, C. F. J. (2008). Bayesian hierarchical modeling for integrating low- accuracy and high-accuracy experiments. Technometrics 50 192-204.
29. Reese, C. S., Wilson, A.G., Hamada, M., Martz, H.F. and Ryan, K. J. (2004). Integrated analysis of computer and physical experiments. Technometrics 46 153-164. MR2060014
30. Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J. and Wynn, H. P. (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. 4 409-435. MR1041765
31. Santner, T.J., Williams, B. J. and Notz, W. I. (2003). The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer, New York. MR2160708
32. Seberry, J. (1979). Some remarks on generalised Hadamard matrices and theorems of Rajkundlia on SBIBD's. In Combinatorial Mathematics. VI (A. F. Horadam and W. D. Wallis, eds.) 154-164. Springer, Berlin. MR0558043
33. Shrikhande, S. S. (1964). Generalized Hadamard matrices and orthogonal arrays of strength two. Canad. J. Math. 16 736-740. MR0166889
34. Stein, M. (1987). Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 29 143-151. MR0887702
35. Steinberg, D. M. and Lin, D. K. J. (2006). A construction method for orthogonal Latin hypercube designs. Biometrika 93 279-288. MR2278083
36. Tang, B. (1993). Orthogonal array-based Latin hypercubes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 1392-1397. MR1245375
37. Tang, B. (1994). A theorem for selecting OA-based Latin hypercubes using a distance criterion. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 23 2047-2058. MR1281902
38. Tang, B. (1998). Selecting Latin hypercubes using correlation criteria. Statist. Sinica 8 409-435. MR1651518
39. Wang, J. C. (1996). Mixed difference matrices and the construction of orthogonal arrays. Statist. Probab. Lett. 28 121-126. MR1394662
40. Wang, J.C. and Wu, C. F. J. (1991). An approach to the construction of asymmetrical orthogonal arrays. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 450-455. MR1137129
41. Welch, W. J., Buck, R.J., Sacks, J., Wynn, H. P., Mitchell, T. J. and Morris, M.D. (1992). Screening, predicting and computer experiments. Technometrics 34 15-25.
42. Wu, C.F.J. and Hamada, M. (2000). Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. Wiley, New York. MR1780411
43. Ye, K. Q. (1998). Orthogonal column Latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 1392-1397. MR1666638