Effects of dichotomous lexical stimuli in concept generation

2008 Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC 2008

Volumn 4, Issue , 2009, Pages 149-159

  Chiu, I ^a   Shu, L H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Concept generation; Design stimuli; Dichotomy; Language

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT GENERATION; DESIGN SUPPORT; ENGINEERING DESIGN; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS;

DESIGN; LINGUISTICS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 69949156484     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Atman, Cynthia J., Chimka, Justin R. and Karen M. Bursie, 1997, Results from a verbal protocol study of the design process, Proc. of Frontiers in Education Conf., v. 3, p. 1283.
2. Altman, D. G., 1991, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, London England: Chapman and Hall.
3. Altshuller, G. S., Shulyak, L., 1996, And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, 2 /e, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA.
4. Benami, O., Jin, Y., 2002, Creative stimulation in conceptual design, ASME DETC/CIE, Montreal, Canada, DETC2002/DTM-34023.
5. Bhaskar, R., Simon, H. A., 1977, Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example from engineering thermodynamics. Cognitive Science, 1: 193-215.
6. Burg, J. F. M., 1997, Linguistic Instruments In Requirements Engineering, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, PhD thesis.
7. Chiu, I., Shu, L. H., 2007a, Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21 /1: 45-59.
8. Chiu, I. Shu, L. H., 2007b. Using language as related stimuli for concept generation, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis & Manufacturing, 21 /2: 103-121.
9. Chiu, I., Shu. L. H., 2007c. Understanding the use of language stimuli in concept generation, ASME IDETC/CIE, Las Vegas, NV, IDETC2007-35772.
10. Chiu, I., Shu, L. H., 2008, Use of opposite-relation lexical stimuli in concept generation, Annals of CIRP, 57 /1, in press.
11. Clark, H. H., Chase, W. G., 1972, On the process of comparing sentences against pictures, Cognitive Psychology, 3: 472-517
12. De Bono, E., 1992, Serious Creativity, HarperCollins, N Y.
13. rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, N Y.
14. nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N J.
15. Dong, A., Hill. A. W., Agogino, A. M., 2003. A document analysis method for characterizing design team performance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126 /3: 378-385.
16. Ericsson. K. A., Simon, H. A., 1993, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Fellbaum, C., 1993, English Verbs as a Semantic Net, Five Papers on WordNet, pp. 40-61. ftp://ftp. cogsci.princeton. edu/pub/wordnet/5papers.ps.
18. Fillenbaum. S., Jones, L. V., 1965, Grammatical contingencies in word association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4: 248-255.
19. Centner, D., France. I., 1988, The verb mutability effect: studies of the combinatorial semantics of nouns and verbs, in Lexical Ambiguity Resolution (Smal, S., Cottrell, G., Tanenhaus, M., Eds). Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
20. Goor, A., Sommerfeld, R. E., 1975, A comparison of problem-solving processes of creative students and noncreative students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (4), 495-505.
21. Gordon, W. J. J., 1961, Synectics, The Development of Creative Capacity, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
22. Grenier, A. L., Schmidt, L. C., 2007, Analysis of engineering design journal sketches and notations, ASME DETC/CIE, Las Vegas, N V, Sept 4-7. 2007, DETC2007-35360.
23. Hacco, E., Shu, L. H., 2002, Biomimetic concept generation applied to design for remanufacture, ASME DETC/CIE, Montreal, Canada, DETC2002/DFM-34177.
24. Hey, J. H. G., Agogino, A. M., 2007, Metaphors in conceptual design, ASME DETC/CIE, Las Vegas, NV, Sept 4-7, 2007, DETC2007-34874.
25. Jackendoff, R., 1983, Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press Cambridge, MA.
26. Ji, H., Yang, M. C., Honda, T., 2007. A probabilistie approach for extracting design preferences from design team discussion, ASME DETC/CIE, Las Vegas. N V, Sept 4-7, 2007, DETC2007-35455.
27. Jin, Y., Geslin, M., 2007, Study of argumentative negotiation in collaborative engineering, ASME DETC/CIE, Las Vegas, N V, DETC2007-35710.
28. nd Edition. Ideation Int'l Inc., Southfield, MI.
29. Landis J. R., Koch G. G., 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 159-174.
30. Lawless. A., 2005, Plato's Sun. An Introduction to Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON.
31. Levinson, S., 1996, Language and Space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25: 353-382.
32. Li, W., Jin, Y., 2006. Fuzzy preference evaluation for hierarchical co-evolutionary design concept generation, ASME IDECT/CIE, Philadelphia, PA, DETC2006-99312.
33. Mabogunje, A., Leifer, L., 1997, Noun phrases as surrogates for measuring early phases of the mechanical design process, ASME DETC/CIE 1997, Sacramento, CA.
34. McRae, K., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Ferretti, T., 2005, A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33: 7 /1174-1184.
35. Miller, G., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K., 1993, Introduction to WordNEt: an on-line lexical database, in Five papers on WordNet, pp. 1-25, ftp://ftp. cogsci.princeton. edu/pub/wordnet/5papers.ps.
36. Murphy, M. L., 2003, Semantic Relations and the Lexicon. Antonymy, Synonymy, and Other Paradigms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. Nuseibeh, B., Easterbrook, S., Requirements engineering: A roadmap, in A. C. W. Finkelstein (ed), The Future of Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press.
38. Osborne, A. F., 1963, Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, N Y.
39. Oxford, 2003, The Oxford American Dictionary and Thesaurus, Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design, A Systematic Approach, K. Wallace, L. Blessing, and F. Bauert, Trans., K. Wallace, Ed., 2/e., Springer-Verlag London Ltd., London, UK.
41. Perttula, M. K., Liikkanen, L. A., 2006 Structural tendencies and exposure effects in design idea generation, ASME DETC/CIE 2006, Philadelphia, PA, DETC2006-99123.
42. Pinker, S., 2007. The Stuff of Thought. Language as a Window into Human Nature, Viking, New York, N Y.
43. Rasmussen, J., Jensen, A., 1974. Mental procedures in real life tasks: A case study in electronics trouble shooting. Ergonomics, 17: 293-30.
44. Segers, N., 2004, Computational representations of words & representations of words & associations in architectural design: Development of a system to support creative design. Bouwstenen 78, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Ph. D. Thesis.
45. Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., Vargas-Hernandez. N., 2000. Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122: 377-384.
46. Shrout, P. E., Fleiss, J. L., 1979, Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. 86 /2: 420-428.
47. Stone. R. B., Wood, K. L., 2000, Development of a Functional Basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 122: 359-369.
48. Ullman, D., 2003, The Mechanical Design Process, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, N Y.
49. Vakili, V., Shu, L. H., 2001. Towards biomimetic concept generation, ASME DETC/CIE, Pittsburg, PA. DETC2001/DTM-21715.
50. Visser, W., 2006, The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah. NJ.
51. Yang, M. C., Wood, W., Cutkosky, M., 2005, Design information retrieval: A thesauri-based approach for reuse of information design information, Engineering with Computers, 21: 177-192.
52. nd Edition. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
53. WordNet, 3.0, http://www.cogsci.princeton. edu.-wn.