A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 194, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 10-13

  Bloom, Steven L ^a   Casey, Brian M ^a   Schaffer, Joseph I ^a   McIntire, Donald D ^a   Leveno, Kenneth J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Coached pushing; Second stage labor management; Uncoached pushing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR; MIDWIFE; NULLIPARA; NURSE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 29544437328     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. N.J. Eastman Williams Obstetrics 10th ed. 1950 Appleton-Century-Crafts, Inc. New York
2. J.E. Roberts The "PUSH" for evidence: management of the second stage J Midwifery Womens Health 47 2002 2 15
3. S. Petrou, D. Coyle, and W.D. Fraser Cost-effectiveness of a delayed pushing policy for patients with epidural anesthesia Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 2000 1158 1164
4. J.I. Schaffer, S.L. Bloom, B.M. Casey, D.D. McIntire, M.A. Nihira, and K.J. Leveno A randomized trial of the effects of coached vs. uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor on postpartum pelvic floor structure and function Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 2005 1692 1696
5. E.C. Hughes Obstetric gynecologic terminology with section on neonatology and glossary of congenital anomalies 1972 F.A. Davis Co. Philadelphia (PA)
6. K.D. Ramin, K.J. Leveno, M.A. Kelly, and T.J. Carmody Amniotic fluid meconium: a fetal environmental hazard Obstet Gynecol 87 1996 181 184
7. M. Fitzpatrick, R. Harkin, K. McQuillan, C. O'Brien, P.R. O'Connell, and C. O'Herlihy A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence BJOG 109 2002 1359 1365
8. W.D. Fraser, S. Marcoux, I. Krauss, J. Douglas, C. Goulet, and M. Boulvain Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 2000 1165 1172
9. S.L. Hansen, S.L. Clark, and J.C. Foster Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 99 2002 29 34
10. I.T. Manyonda, D.E. Shaw, and J.O. Drife The effect of delayed pushing in the second stage of labor with continuous lumbar epidural analgesia Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69 1990 291 295
11. M. Maresh, K.-H. Choong, and R.W. Beard Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural analgesia in labour Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90 1983 623 627
12. L.J. Mayberry, R. Hammer, C. Kelly, B. True-Driver, and A. De Use of delayed pushing with epidural anesthesia: findings from a randomized, controlled trial J Perinatol 19 1999 26 30
13. S. Vause, H.M. Congdon, and J.G. Thornton Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: A randomised controlled trial Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105 1998 186 188
14. J.L. Hawkins, B.R. Beaty, and C.P. Gibbs Update on U.S. OB anesthesia practice Anesthesiology 91 Suppl 1999 A1060 (Abstract)
15. H.K. Eltzschig, E.S. Lieberman, and W.R. Camann Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery N Engl J Med 348 2003 319 332