R: A quantitative measure of NMR signal receiving efficiency

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 200, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 239-244

  Mo, Huaping ^a,b   Harwood, John ^a   Zhang, Shucha ^a   Xue, Yi ^a   Santini, Robert ^a   Raftery, Daniel ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

90 Pulse length; Concentration reference; NMR; Probe tuning and matching; Receiving efficiency

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; CONCENTRATION REFERENCE; DIELECTRIC CONSTANTS; ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES; MATCHING CONDITION; NMR; NMR SIGNALS; OPTIMAL PROBE; PULSE LENGTH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; RECEIVING EFFICIENCY; REFERENCE SOLUTION; TRANSVERSE MAGNETIZATION;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MAGNETS; PROBES; TUNING;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 69949146728     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: 10960856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Mo H., and Raftery D. Solvent signal as an NMR concentration reference. Anal. Chem. 80 (2008) 9835-9839
2. 13C isotope ratio determination. Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 8266-8269
3. Akoka S., Barantin L., and Trierweiler M. Concentration measurement by proton NMR using the ERETIC method. Anal. Chem. 71 (1999) 2554-2557
4. Hoult D.I., and Richards R.E. The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. J. Magn. Reson. 24 (1976) 71-85
5. Insko E.K., Elliott M.A., Schotland J.C., and Leigh J.S. Generalized reciprocity. J. Magn. Reson. 131 (1998) 111-117
6. Hoult D.I. The principle of reciprocity in signal strength calculations - a mathematical guide. Concept Magn. Reson. 12 (2000) 173-187
7. van der Klink J.J. The NMR reciprocity theorem for arbitrary probe geometry. J. Magn. Reson. 148 (2001) 147-154
8. Gerardin C., Haouas M., Lorentz C., and Taulelle F. NMR quantification in hydrothermal in situ syntheses. Magn. Reson. Chem. 38 (2000) 429-435
9. Wider G., and Dreier L. Measuring protein concentrations by NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 2571-2576
10. Hoult D.I. The NMR receiver: a description and analysis of design. Prog. NMR Spect. 12 (1978) 41-77
11. Mispelter J., Lupu M., and Briguet A. NMR Probeheads for Biophysical and Biochemical Experiments: Theoretical Principles & Practical Guidelines (2006), Imperial College Press, London
12. Marion D.J.-Y., and Desvaux H. An alternative tuning approach to enhance NMR signals. J. Magn. Reson. 193 (2008) 153-157
13. Hoult D.I., and Lauterbur P.C. The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples. J. Magn. Reson. 34 (1979) 425-433
14. Gadian D.G., and Robinson F.N.H. Radiofrequency losses in NMR experiments on electrically conducting samples. J. Magn. Reson. 34 (1979) 449-455
15. Hwang F., and Hoult D.I. Automatic probe tuning and matching. Magn. Reson. Med. 39 (1998) 214-222
16. Lide D.R. In: Lide D.R. (Ed). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 82nd ed. (2001), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (section 8)
17. Kelly A.E., Ou H.D., Withers R., and Dötsch V. Low-conductivity buffers for high-sensitivity NMR measurements. J. Am. Chem. Assoc. 124 (2002) 12013-12019
18. Szántay C. Analysis and implications of transition-band signals in high-resolution NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 135 (1998) 334-352
19. 1 field distribution with nonideal gradients in a high-resolution NMR spectrometer. J. Magn. Reson. 137 (1999) 108-115