Likelihood ratio tests for maternal and fetal genetic effects on obstetric complications

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 526-538

  Chen, Jinbo ^a   Zheng, Haitao ^a   Wilson, Melissa L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fetal genotype; Likelihood ratio test; Maternal genotype; Maternal fetal gene gene interaction; Obstetric complications

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; GENOTYPE; HEREDITY; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; DNA; FEMALE; FETUS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHENOTYPE; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 69949131697     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20405     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aitchison J, Silvey SD. 1958. Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters subject to restraints. Ann Math Stat 29:813-828.
2. Chatterjee N, Carroll RJ. 2005. Semiparametric maximum-likelihood estimation exploiting gene-environment independence in casecontrol studies. Biometrika 92:399-418.
3. Chen J, Chatterjee N. 2007. Exploiting Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for efficient screening of single SNP associations from case-control studies. Hum Hered 63:196-204.
4. Dekker GA, Sibai BM. 1998. Etiology and pathogenesis of preeclampsia: current concepts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1359-1375.
5. Epstein MP, Satten GA. 2003. Inference on haplotype effects in casecontrol studies using unphased genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1316-1329.
6. Goddard KA, Tromp G, Romero R, Olson JM, Lu Q, Xu Z, Parimi N, Nien JK, Gomez R, Behnke E, Solari M, Espinoza J, Santolaya J, Chaiworapongsa T, Lenk GM, Volkenant K, Anant MK, Sailsbury BA, Carr J, Lee MS, Vovis GF, Kuivaniemi H. 2007. Candidate-gene association study of mothers with pre-eclampsia, and their infants, analyzing 775 SNPs in 190 genes. Hum Hered 63:1-16.
7. Lin DY, Zeng D. 2006. Likelihood-based inference on haplotype effects in genetic association studies (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 101:89-118.
8. Liston WA, Kilpatrick DC. 1991. Is genetic susceptibility to preeclampsia conferred by homozygosity for the same single recessive gene in mother and fetus? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:1079-1086.
9. Luo S, Mukherjee B, Chen J, Chatterjee N. 2009. Shrinkage estimation for robust and efficient screening of single SNP association from case-control genome-wide association studies. Genetic Epidemiol (under minor revision).
10. Piegorsch WW, Weinberg CR, Taylor JA. 1994. Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. Stat Med 13:153-162.
11. Saftlas AF, Beydoun H, Triche E. 2005. Immunogenetic determinants of preeclampsia and related pregnancy disorders: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 106:162-172.
12. Satten G, Epstein MP. 2004. Comparison of prospective and retrospective methods for haplotype inference in case-control studies. Genet Epidemiol 27:192-201.
13. Scott AJ, Wild CJ. 1997. Fitting regression models to case-control data by maximum likelihood. Biometrika 84:57-71.
14. Sinsheimer JS, Palmer CG, Woodward JA. 2003. Detecting genotype combinations that increase risk for disease: maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility test. Genet Epidemiol 24:1-13.
15. Spinka C, Carroll RJ, Chatterjee N. 2005. Analysis of case-control studies of genetic and environmental factors with missing genetic information and haplotype-phase ambiguity. Genet Epidemiol 29:108-127.
16. Wilson ML, Goodwin TM, Pan VL, Ingles SA. 2003. Molecular epidemiology of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 58:39-66.