Universal design: Online educational media for students with disabilities

Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness

Volumn 103, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 495-500

  Sapp, Wendy ^a  

^a Visual Impairment Education Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949116800     PISSN: 0145482X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0910300807     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (2007). The role of instructional design in assistive technology research and development. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 135-140.
2. Burgstahler, S. (2005). Universal design of instruction. Seattle: DO-IT, University of Washington. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://www.washington. edu/doit/Brochures/Academics/instruction.html
3. Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., & Itani, A. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 301-309.
4. Engstrom, C. R., & Stricklin, M. (1992, August). Disabled persons and mass media usage: DeafNebraskans offer their viewpoints. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5. Flores, M. M. (2008). Universal design in elementary and middle school. Childhood Education, 84, 224-229.
6. Frazier, G., & Continho-Johnson, I. (1995). The effectiveness of audio description in providing access to educational AV media for blind and visually impaired students in high school. San Francisco: AudioVision.
7. Goldberg, L., Joyce, R., & Field, G. (1998). Issues to be addressed in a possible FCC requirement for video description ofvideo programming: A report from the WGBH Educational Foundation. Boston: WGBH Education Foundation.
8. Hodge, M. E. (1998). Teaching foreign languages to at-risk learners: A challenge for the new millennium. Inquiry, 2, 68-78.
9. King, C. M. (1993). Multimedia captioning: Synchronizer text and audio presentations. In H. A. Maurer (Ed.), Educational multimedia and hypermedia annual, 1993: Proceedings of ED-Media '93 (pp. 609-614). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
10. Koskinen, P. S., Wilson, R. M., Gambrell, L. B., & Neuman, S. B. (1993). Captioned video and vocabulary learning: An innovative practice in literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 47, 36-43.
11. Lewis, M. S. J., & Jackson, D. W. (2001). Television literacy: Comprehension of program content using closed captions for the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 43-53.
12. Lindebarger, D. L. (2001). Learning to read from television: The effects of using captions and narration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 288-298.
13. McInerney, M., Riley, K., & Osher, D. (1999). Technology to support literacy strategies for students who are deaf: Final report. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
14. Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 94-106.
15. Otto, S. K., & Pusak, J. P. (1996). Technological choices to meet the challenges. In B. H. Wing (Ed.), Foreign languages for all: Challenges and choices. (pp. 141-186). Lincolnwood, IL: National Text book Company.
16. Packer, J. (1995, August). Psychosocial benefits of accessible television for blind/ visually impaired persons. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
17. Rose, D. H., Hasselbring, T. S., Stahl, S., & Zabala, J. (2005). Assistive technology and universal design for learning: Two sides of the same coin. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education, technology research, and practice (pp. 507-518). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
18. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. Rothberg, M., & Wlodkowski, T. (2000). Making educational software accessible: Design guidelines including math and science solutions. Boston: CPB/WGBH National Center for Accessible Media.
20. Schmeidler, E., & Kirchner, C. (2001). Adding audio description: Does it make a difference? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 197-212.
21. Shea, P. (2000). Leveling the playing field: A study of captioned interactive video for second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 243-263.
22. Simpson, J. A. (1999). When a word is worth a thousand pictures: Improved television access for blind viewers in the digital era. Glen Iris, Victoria, Australia: Information Alternatives. Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www.bca.org.au/digtv.htm
23. Taylor, L. (1999). An integrated learning system and its effect on examination performance in mathematics. Computers & Education, 32, 95-107.
24. Wake, M., Poulakis, Z., Hughes, E. K., Carey-Sargeant, C., & Rickards, F. W. (2005). Hearing impairment: A population study of age at diagnosis, severity, and language outcomes at 7-8 years. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90, 238-244.