Selection of chemicals for the development and evaluation of in vitro methods for skin sensitisation testing

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 305-312

  Casati, Silvia ^a   Aeby, Pierre ^b   Kimber, Ian ^c   Maxwell, Gavin ^d   Ovigne, Jean Marc ^e   Roggen, Erwin ^f   Rovida, Costanza ^a   Tosti, Luca ^a   Basketter, David ^g  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b Wella Cosmital SA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^e Advanced Research   (France)

^f NOVOZYMES A S   (Denmark)

^g DABMEB CONSULTANCY LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1 CHLORO 2,4 DINITROBENZENE; 2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; 2 MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE; ALLERGEN; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; BROMINE DERIVATIVE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CINNAMALDEHYDE; CINNAMYL ALCOHOL; DIAMINE DERIVATIVE; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; EUGENOL; GLYCEROL; GLYOXAL; HAPTEN; ISOEUGENOL; LACTIC ACID; OXAZOLONE; SALICYLIC ACID; THIRAM;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INDUSTRY; MODEL; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN; SKIN SENSITIZATION; TOXICITY TESTING; UNIVERSITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 69949107893     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290903700313     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Magnusson, B. & Kligman, A.M. (1970). Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig, 141pp. Springfield, IL, USA: Charles C. Thomas.
2. Buehler, E.V. (1965). Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Archives of Dermatology 91, 171-177.
3. Kimber, I. & Basketter, D.A. (1992). The murine local lymph node assay; collaborative studies and new directions: A commentary. Food & Chemical Toxicology 30, 165-169.
4. EU (2003). Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximations of laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union L66, 26-35.
5. EC (2006). Regulation No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L396, 1-849.
6. US National Research Council (2007). Toxicity Testing in the Twenty-first Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Committee on Toxicity and Assessment of Environmental Agents, 191pp. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council.
7. Basketter, D. & Maxwell, G. (2007). In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers. Cutaneous & Ocular Toxicology 26, 359-373.
8. Aeby, P., Ashikaga, T., Diembeck, W., Eschrich, D., Gerberick, F., Kimber, I., Marrec-Fairley, M., Maxwell, G., Ovigne, J-M., Sakaguchi, H., Tailhardat, M. & Teissier, S. (2008). The Colipa strategy for the development of in vitro alternatives: skin sensitization. AATEX 14, 375-379.
9. Sens-it-iv: Novel Testing Strategies for In Vitro Assessment of Allergens website. Available at: http://www.sens-it-iv.eu/ (Accessed 11.03.09).
10. Jowsey, I.R., Basketter, D.A., Westmoreland, C. & Kimber, I. (2006). A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal. Journal of Applied Toxicology 26, 341-350. (Pubitemid 44064933)
11. Curren, R.D., Southee, J.A., Spielmann, H., Liebsch, M., Fentem, J.H. & Balls, M. (1995). The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. ECVAM Prevalidation Task Force Report 1. ATLA 23, 211-217.
12. Balls, M., Blaauboer, B.J., Fentem, J.H., Bruner, L., Combes, R.D., Ekwall, B., Fielder, R.J., Guillouzo, A., Lewis, R.W., Lovell, D.P., Reinhardt, C.A., Repetto, G., Sladowski, D., Spielmann, H. & Zucco, F. (1995). Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. ECVAM Workshop Report 5. ATLA 23, 129-147.
13. OECD (2005). OECD Series on Testing and Assessment. No.34. Guidance Document on the Validation and International Acceptance of New or Updated Test Methods for Hazard Assessment, 96pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
14. ECHA (2008). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.4: Evaluation of Available Information, 23pp. Helsinki, Finland, European Chemicals Agency. Available at: http://guidance.echa.europa. eu/docs/guidance-document/information-requirements-r4-en.pdf?vers =20-08-08 (Accessed 13.02.09).
15. Anon. (2003). Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). Part 3: Health and Environmental Hazards, pp. 151-158. New York, NY, USA, and Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Organisation.
16. OECD (2002). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No.429. Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay, 7pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
17. Aptula, A.O., Patlewicz, G. & Roberts, D.W. (2005). Skin sensitisation: reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure activity relationships. Chemical Research in Toxicology 18, 1420-1426. (Pubitemid 41361715)
18. Roberts, D., Patlewicz, G., Kern, P., Gerberick, F., Kimber, I., Dearman, R., Ryan, C., Basketter, D. & Aptula, A. (2007). Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a Local Lymph Node Assay dataset for skin sensitization. Chemical Research in Toxicology 20, 1019-1030. (Pubitemid 47204815)
19. Lepoittevin, J.P. (2006). Metabolism versus chemical transformation or pro- versus prehaptens? Contact Dermatitis 54, 73-74.
20. Bos, J.D. & Meinardi, M.M.H.M. (2000). The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Experimental Dermatology 9, 165-169.
21. Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Kern, P.S., Schlatter, H., Dearman, R.J., Kimber, I., Patlewicz, G.Y. & Basketter, D.A. (2005). Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitisation alternative methods. Dermatitis 16, 157-202. (Pubitemid 43053764)
22. ECETOC (1999). Technical Report No.77 - Skin and Respiratory Sensitisers: Reference Chemical Data Bank. ISSN-0773-8072-8077, 85pp. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.
23. Sens-it-iv (2007). WP 1: set of reference compounds. Newsletter Number 02, 26 January 2007. Available at: http://www.sens-it-iv.eu/files/newsletter/ Sens-it-iv-Newsletter-02.pdf (Accessed 05.02.09).
24. Basketter, D.A., Wright, Z.M. & Warbrick, E.V. (2001). Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 45, 89-94. (Pubitemid 32738426)
25. Basketter, D.A. & Kimber, I. (2006). Predictive test for irritants and allergens and their use in quantitative risk assessment. In Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edition (ed. P.J. Frosch, T. Menné & J-P. Lepoittevin), pp. 179-188. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
26. Baer, H., Stone, S.H. & Malik, F. (1976). Early and late contact sensitivity reactions in guinea pigs sensitized to oxazolone. Journal of Immunology 117, 1159-1163.
27. Roberts, D.W., Goodwin, B.F.J., Williams, D.L., Jones, K., Johnson, A.W. & Alderson, J.C.E. (1983). Correlation between skin sensitisation potential and chemical reactivity for p-nitrobenzyl compounds. Food Chemical Toxicology 211, 811-813.
28. Thompson, R., Finn, A.M. & Rycroft, R.J.G. (1998). Allergic contact dermatitis from para-nitrobenzyl bromide. Contact Dermatitis 38, 232. (Pubitemid 28156136)
29. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F., Kimber, I. & Loveless, S.E. (1996). The local lymph node assay: A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Food & Chemical Toxicology 34, 985-997.
30. Friedmann, P.S. (2007). The relationships between exposure dose and response in induction and elicitation of contact hypersensitivity in humans. The British Journal of Dermatology 157, 1093-1102.
31. Wahlkvist, H., Boman, A., Montelius, J. & Wahlberg, J.E. (1999). Sensitising potential in mice, guinea pig and man of the preservative Euxyl K400 and its ingredient methyldibromo glutaronitrile. Contact Dermatitis 41, 330-338. (Pubitemid 30018889)
32. Wilkinson, J.D., Shaw, S., Andersen, K.E., Brandao, F.M., Bruynzeel, D.P., Bruze, M., Camarasa, J.M., Diepgen, T.L., Ducomns, G., Frosch, P.J., Goossens, A., Lachappelle, J.M., Lahti, A., Menné, T., Seidenari, S., Tosti, A. & Wahlberg, J.E. (2002). Monitoring levels of biocide sensitivity in Europe. A ten year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis 46, 207-210.
33. Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Kimber, I., Dearman, R.J., Lea, L.J. & Basketter, D.A. (2000). Local lymph node assay validation assessment for regulatory purposes. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 11, 3-18. (Pubitemid 30143868)
34. Elsner, P., Pevny, I. & Burg, G. (1990). Occupational contact dermatitis due to glyoxal in health care workers. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1, 250-253.
35. Uter, W., Schwanitz, H.J., Lessman, H. & Schnuch, A. (2001). Glyoxal is an important allergen for (medical care) cleaning staff. International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health 204, 251-253. (Pubitemid 34087357)
36. Aalto-Korte, K., Mäkelä, E.A., Huttunen, M., Suuronen, K. & Jolanki, R. (2005). Occupational contact allergy to glyoxal. Contact Dermatitis 52, 276-281.
37. Basketter, D.A., Selbie, E., Scholes, E.W., Lees, D., Kimber, I. & Botham, P.A. (1993). Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitisers in the maximisation, Buehler and local lymph node assays. Food & Chemical Toxicology 31, 63-67. (Pubitemid 23067128)
38. Basketter, D.A. & Gerberick, G.F. (1996). Interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test. Contact Dermatitis 35, 146-151.
39. Andersen, K.E., White, I.R. & Goossens, A. (2006). Allergens from the standard series. In Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edition (ed. P.J. Frosch, T. Menné & J-P. Lepoittevin), pp. 453-492. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
40. Kligman, A.M. (1966). The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III: The maximisation test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 47, 393.
41. Basketter, D.A. & Scholes, E.W. (1992). Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea pig maximisation test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Food & Chemical Toxicology 30, 65-69.
42. Marzulli, F.N. & Maibach, H.I. (1980). Contact allergy: predictive testing of fragrance ingredients in humans by Draize and maximization methods. Journal of Environmental Pathology & Toxicology 3, 235-245.
43. Ziegler, V., Suess, E., Standav, H. & Hasert, K. (1972). Der Meerschweinchen -Maximisations Test zum Nachweis der sensibilisierenden Wirkung wichtiger Industrieprodukte. Allegie und Immunologie 18, 203.
44. Wahlberg, J.E. & Boman, A. (1985). Guinea pig maximisation test. In Contact Allergy Predictive Tests in Guinea Pigs. Current Problems in Dermatology Vol. 14 (ed. K.E. Andersen & H.I. Maibach), p. 59. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
45. Thyssen, J.P. & White, J.M.L. (2008). Epidemiological data on consumer allergy p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 59, 327-343.
46. Marzulli, F.N. & Maibach, H.I. (1974). The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: experimental contact sensitization in man. Food & Cosmetics Toxicology 12, 219-227.
47. Maurer, T., Thomann, P., Weirich, E.G. & Hess, R. (1979). Predictive evaluation in animals of the contact allergenic potential of medically important substances. II: Comparisons of different methods of cutaneous sensitisation with 'weak' allergens. Contact Dermatitis 5, 1.
48. Klecak, G., Geleik, H. & Frey, J.R. (1977). Screening of fragrance materials for allergenicity in the guinea pig. I: Comparison of four testing methods. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 28, 53-64. (Pubitemid 8057992)
49. Thompson, G.R., Booman, K.A., Dorsky, J., Kohrman, K.A., Rothenstein, A.S., Schwoeppe, E.A., Sedlak, R.I. & Steltenkamp, R.J. (1983). Isoeugenol: a survey of consumer patch-test sensitisation. Food & Chemical Toxicology 6, 735-740.
50. Jordan, W.P. Jr & King, S.E. (1977). Delayed hypersensitivity in females. The development of allergic contact dermatitis in females during the comparison of two predictive patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 3, 19-26.
51. Rietschel, R.L. & Fowler, J.F. (2008). Fisher's Contact Dermatitis, 6th Edition, pp. 129-130. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker, Inc.
52. Cronin, M.T.D. & Basketter, D.A. (1994). Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research 2, 159-179.
53. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F. & Kimber, I. (1998). Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests. Food & Chemical Toxicology 36, 327-333.
54. Tupker, R.A., Willis, C., Berardesca, E., Lee, C.H., Fartasch, M., Agner, T. & Serup, J. (1997). Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 37, 53-69.
55. ECETOC (2003). Technical Report No.87 - Contact Sensitisation: Classification According to Potency. ISSN-0773-8072-8087, 24pp. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.