The effect of chlorine and oxygen concentrations on the removal of mercury at an FGD-batch reactor

Fuel

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2489-2494

  Acuña Caro, Carolina ^a   Brechtel, Kevin ^a   Scheffknecht, Guenter ^a   Braß, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b AE and E Lentjes GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Flue gas desulphurisation; Mercury removal; Parameter influence

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL FORMS; CONCENTRATION OF; CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENTS; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; FLUE GAS DESULPHURISATION; GASEOUS MERCURY; GASEOUS SAMPLES; GLASS REACTORS; HIGH CONCENTRATION; LABORATORY SCALE; MERCURY REMOVAL; MERCURY SPECIES; OXIDATIVE CONDITIONS; OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS; PARAMETER INFLUENCE; WATER BATHS;

BATCH REACTORS; CHLORINE; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DESULFURIZATION; FLUE GASES; FLUES; NUCLEAR REACTORS; OXYGEN; SCRUBBERS; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY;

MERCURY (METAL);

EID: 69949107659     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.11.028     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Aylett B.J. The chemistry of zinc, cadmium and mercury. Comprehensive inorganic chemistry (1975), Pergamon Press p. 277 [chapter 30]
2. Senior C., Sarofim A., Zeng T., Helble J., and Mamani-Paco R. Gas-phase transformations of mercury in coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process Technol 63 (2000) 197-213
3. Acuña-Caro C., Thorwarth H., and Scheffknecht G. A thermodynamic study on the effects of individual flue gas components on mercury speciation. Power Plant Chem 8 (2006) 374-381
4. Senior C, Montgomery C, Sarofim A, Wendt J. Evaluation of co-benefits strategies for utility mercury control. In: Proceedings of the 31st international technical conference on coal utilization and fuel systems. FL: Clearwater; 2006 [May 21-26].
5. Thorwarth H, Beck J, Unterberger S, Scheffknecht G. The adsorption and oxidation behaviour of mercury on the constituents of SCR DeNOx catalysts. In: Presented at the 30th international technical conference on coal utilization and fuel systems. FL: Clearwater; 2005.
6. Gutberlet H., Spiesberger A., Kastner F., and Tembrink J. Zum verhalten des spurenelementes quecksilber in steinkohlefeuerungen mit rauchgasreinigungsanlagen. VGB Kraftwerkstechnik 72 (1992) 636-641
7. Díaz-Somoano M., Unterberger S., and Hein K.G.R. Using wet FGD systems for mercury removal. J Environ Monit 7 (2005) 906-909
8. Braun H., Metzger M., and Vogg H. Zur problematik der quecksilber-abscheidung aus rauchgasen von müllverbrennungsanlagen, 2. Teil Müll Abfall 3 (1986) 89-95
9. VGB Power Tech e.V. VGB merkblatt analyse von REA-Gips, VGB-M 701; 2008 [preliminary version].
10. Miller Ch, Feeley T, Aljoe W, Lani B, Schroeder K, Kairies C, et al. Mercury capture and fate using wet FGD at coal-fired power plants. DOE/NETL mercury and wet FGD R&D; August 2006.
11. Sarkar D., Essington M., and Misra K. Adsorption of mercury(II) by kaolinite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64 (2000) 1968-1974
12. Kanefke R, Vosteen B, Koeser H. Mercury retention in scrubbers - complexation by chlorides and bromides. In: Seventh european conference on industrial furnaces and boilers. Porto; April 2006.
13. Zimmermann K., Pasel C., Luckas M., and Herbell J. Löslichkeit von schwefeldioxid in wässrigen systemen bei höheren elektrolytkonzentrationen, I. Chloridhaltige Syst Chem Ing Tech 80 (2008) 987-995
14. Sarkar D. Preliminary studies on mercury solubility in the presence of iron oxide phases using static headspace analysis. Environ Geosci 10 (2003) 151-155