Mercury capture and fate using Wet FGD at coal-fired power plants

Proceedings of the EPA-DOE-EPRI-A and WMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium 2006

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 533-548

  Miller, Charles E ^a   Feeley III, Thomas J ^a   Aljoe, William W ^a   Schroeder, Karl T ^a   Kairies, Candace ^a   McNemar, Andrea T ^b   Jones, Andrew P ^b   Murphy, James T ^b  

^a NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD); MERCURY CAPTURE; OXIDATION ADDITIVES; OXIDIZED MERCURY;

COAL GASIFICATION; DESULFURIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FLUE GASES; MERCURY (METAL); RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

POWER PLANTS;

EID: 34247234483     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Multi-Pollutant Regulatory Analysis: CAIR/CAMR/CAVR. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, October 2005. http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/ mp/cair_camr_cavr.pdf
2. Kilgroe, J.; Sedman, C.; Srivastava, R.; Ryan, J.; Lee, C.; Thorneloe, S. Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers: Interim Report Including Errata Dated 3-21-02; EPA-600/R-01109; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April 2002.
3. Senior, C.; Adams, B. Dynamic Duo Captures Mercury; Power Engineering, February 2006.
4. Laudal, D.L.; Thompson, J.S.; Pavlish, J.H.; Brickett, L.; Chu, P.; Srivastava, R.K.; Lee, C.W.; Kilgroe, J. The Evaluation of Mercury Speciation at Power Plants Using SCR and SNCR Control Technologies; EM 2003, February, 16-22.
5. 2004 Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Production and Use Survey. American Coal Ash Association. http://www.acaa-usa.org/
6. Buyer's Guide to Coal Ash Containing Products. University of North Dakota, Energy and Environmental Research Center. http://www.undeerc.org/ carrc/BuyersGuide/default.asp
7. Feeley, T.J.; Murphy, J.T.; Hoffmann, J.W.; Granite, E.J.; and Renninger, S.A. DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology Research Program for Coal-Fired Power Plants; EM 2003, October, 16-23.
8. Aljoe, W.; Feeley, T.; Murphy, J. and Brickett, L. The Fate of Mercury in Coal Utilization Byproducts; EM 2005, May, 19-26.
9. American Coal Ash Association. See http://www.acaa-usa.org/.
10. Lissianski, Vitali, GE Energy and Environmental Research Corporation. Preliminary Field Evaluation of Mercury Controls Using Combustion Modifications. Quarterly Report August 2004. http://www.netl.doe.gov/ technologies/coalpower/ewr/mercury/control-tech/pubs/41725Q1.pdf.
11. Laudal, Dennis, UNDEERC. Effect of Selective Catalytic Reduction on Mercury, 2002 Field Studies Update. Final Report, October 2003. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/mercury/pubs/ Sel_Cat_Red_2002.pdf
12. Laudal, Dennis; Wocken, Chad; and Reilkoff, Thea, UNDEERC. JV Task 76 - Evaluation of the Impact of Selective Catalytic Reduction on Hg Speciation for a Power Plant Firing a Blended Coal at DTE Energy 's Monroe Power Station. Final Report, April 2005.
13. CONSOL Energy Inc., Research & Development. Evaluation of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Facitlities with SCR and FGD Systems. Topical Reports Numbered 1 through 10, May 2004 through January 2006. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/mercurv/control-tech/ scr-fgd.html.
14. Reaction Engineering International. Oxidation of Mercury Across SCR Catalysts in Coal-Fired Pwer Plants Burning Low Rank Fuels. Final Report, December 2004. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/mercurv/ control-tech/pubs/FG093004.pdf.
15. NETL website, Pilot Testing of Mercury Oxidation Catalysts Project Summary. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/mercury/ control-tech/oxidation.html.
16. Benson, Steven; Holmes, Michael; McCollor, Donald; Mackenzie, Jill; and Kong Lingbu. UNDEERC. Large-Scale Mercury Control Technology Testing for Lignite-Fired Utilities - Oxidation Systems for Wet FGD. Technical Progress Report, February 2006. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/ mercurv/control-tech/pubs/41991%20Q123105.pdf.
17. Romanosky, Robert; Pletcher, Sara; Blythe, Gary. Bench Scale Kinetics of Mercury Reactions in FGD Liquors. Fact Sheet, January 2006. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/mercury/control-tech/pubs/ Project346.pdf.
18. Babcock & Wilcox Company and McDermott Technology, Inc. Full-Scale Testing of Enhanced Mercury Control Technologies for Wet FGD Systems. Final Report, May 2003. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/ mercury/control-tech/pubs/41006Final%20Report.pdf.
19. Blythe, Gary. URS Corporation. Field Testing of a Wet FGD Additive for Enhanced Mercury Control -Pilot-Scale Test Results. Topical Report May 2006.
20. Meischen, Sandra, Tennessee Valley Authority. The Effect of Mercury Control on Wallboard Manufacture. Final Report, July 2004. http://wvwri.nrcce.wvu.edu/programs/cbrc/reports/01CBRCM12_final.pdf.
21. Marshall, Jessica; Blythe, Gary; Richardson, Mandi. Fate of Mercury in Synthetic Gypsum Used for Wallboard Production. Topical Reports 1 through 4, April 2005 through November 2005. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/ coalpower/ewr/coal_utilization_byproducts/enviro/gypsum.html.
22. Kairies, Candace; Schroeder, Karl; Cardone, Carol, NETL. Mercury in Gypsum Produced from Flue Gas Desulfurization. FUEL, 2006.