WHO benefits from demand-driven distribution of HIV/AIDS services? an analysis of the emerging CBO sector in Malawi

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 155-166

  Schou, Arild ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH EASTERN NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Africa; Community based organisations; Decentralisation; Demand driven processes; HIV AIDS; Malawi

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; DECENTRALIZATION; HEALTH SERVICES; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; SERVICE PROVISION; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

AFRICA; EAST AFRICA; MALAWI; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

EID: 69949100725     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: 1099162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.520     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aidsalliance. 2007. Supporting Civil Society Organisation to Reach Key Population in the Latin American and Caribbean region. March The international HIV/AIDS Alliance. http://www.aidsalliance.org.
2. Azfar O, Satu K, Meagher P. 2001. Conditions for effective decentralised governance: A synthesis of research findings. March. Centre for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector. March University of Maryland: College Park. http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/LearningProgram/Decentralization/ConditionsEffective.pdf
3. Bardhan B, Moockerjee D. 2005. Decentralising anti-poverty programme delivery in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics 89(4): 675-704.
4. Bierschenk T, Chauveau JP, Sardan JP. 2000. Courtiers en développement. Les villages africains en quête de projets. APAD, Institut fur Ethnologie, J. Gutemberg Universität: Paris.
5. Billis D, MacKeith J. 1992. Growth and change in NGOs: concepts and comparative experience. In Making a Difference. NGO and Development in a Changing World, Edwards M, Hulme D (eds). Earthschan: London; 118-126.
6. Chabal P, Daloz JP. 2001. Africa Works: Disorder as Political Instrument. James Currey: London.
7. Cornwall A, Gaventa J. 2001. From users and choosers to makers and shapers: repositioning participation in social policy. IDS Working Paper 127.
8. Dagupta A, Beard V. 2007. Community driven development, collective action and elite capture in Indonesia. Development and Change 38(2): 229-249.
9. Edwards M, Hulme D. 1992. Making a Difference. NGO and Devlopment in a Changing World. Earthschan: London.
10. Fauget J. 2004. Does decentralisation increase responsiveness to local needs? Journal of Public Economies 88(3-4): 867-894.
11. Goertz AM, Jenkins R. 2001. Gender-sensitive local auditing: initiatives from India to build accountability to women. Development Outreach, Spring.
12. Governmnet of Malawi. 2005. Malawi HIV and AIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Report 2005. Office of the President and Cabinet.
13. Howell J, Pearce H. 2001. Civil Socity and Deveopment. A Critical Exploration. Boulder: London.
14. Krischna A. 2004. Partnerships between Elected Local Governments and Community-Based Organisations: Exploring the Scope for Synergy. Social Development Papers 52(February): 2-32.
15. Katzenstein D, Laga M, Moatti JP. 2003. The evaluation of the HIV/AIDS drug access initiatives in Cote d'Ivoire, Senegal and Uganda: how access to antiretroviral treatment can become feasible in Africa' in AIDS 17 (Suppl. 3):S1-S4.
16. Katzenstein D, Laga M, Moatti JP. 2003. The evaluation of the HIV/AIDS drug access initiatives in Cote d'Ivoire, Senegal and Uganda: how access to antiretroviral treatment can become feasible in Africa' Immune Deficiency Syndromes 34(3): 281-288.
17. Mamdani M, Bangser M. 2004. Poor People's Experiences of Health Services in Tanzania. A. Literature Review'. A. Report to Women's Dignity Project. Women's Dignity Project: Dar es Salaam.
18. Neubert D. 2007. The role of local brokers in the development system. Experiences with ''self!help projects'' in East Africa", Le bulletin de l'APAD, n- 11, Le développement négocié: courtiers, savoirs, technologies, [En ligne], mis en ligne le: 2 juillet 2007. http://apad.revues.org/document731.html. Consulté le 23 avril 2008.
19. Platteau J, Gaspart F. 2003. The risk of resource misappropriation in community-driven development. World Development 21(10): 1687-1703.
20. Platteau J. 2004. Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development'. Development and Change 35(2): 223-246.
21. Schou A. 2002. Popular participation in decentralised service delivery and social funds. NIBR, Working Paper 124.
22. Schou A. 2007. Demand-driven poverty programmes and elite capture in Malawi. Between prebendialism and benevolence. European Journal of Development Research 19(4): 594-613.
23. Shafer MJ. 2005. Family contributions to self help schooling in Malawi and Kenya. Rural Sociolocy 70(1): 70-93.
24. Tendler J. 2000. 'Why are social funds so popular?' In Local Dynamics in an Era of Globalization. 21st Century Catalysts for Development. Background papers for WDR 1999/2000, Yusuf S, Weiping W, Evenett S (eds). World Bank: Whachington DC.
25. ZIMZIF (The Zambia Social Investment Funds). 2003. Mid Term Review Issues Paper, 14 March, Annex 25(2 September).