Presence and global presence in genres of self-presentation: A framework for comparative analysis

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 357-384

  Atkinson, Nathan S ^a   Kaufer, David ^a   Ishizaki, Suguru ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849133582     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940802167583     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berkenkotter Carol., Thomas Huckin., Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition, Culture, Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press, 1995.
2. Campbell Karlyn Kohrs., Kathleen Hall Jamieson., Form and Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action. Falls Chruch, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1978.
3. Coe Richard., Lorelei Lingard., Tatiana Teslenko., “Genre as Action, Strategy, and Difference: An Introduction.” The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre (pp. 1-10). Eds. Richard Coe, Lorelei Lingard, and Tatiana Teslenko. Creeskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2002.
4. Ellis Nick C., “Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure.” The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 43-62). Eds. Catherine Doughty., Michael Long., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
5. Gross Alan G., “Presence as Argument in the Public Sphere.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (2005): 5-21.
6. Gross, Alan G., Ray D. Dearin., Chaim Perelman., Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.
7. Hamilton J. T., All the News that’s Fit to Sell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
8. Hart R., Campaign Talk: Why Elections are Good for Us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
9. Hart R., Childers J., “The evolution of candidate Bush,” American Behavorial Scientist 49 (2005): 180-197.
10. Hill Charles., “The Psychology of Rhetorical Images.” Defining Visual Rhetorics (pp. 25-40). Eds. Charles A. Hill and Marguerite Helmers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
11. Hoey Michael., Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. New York: Routledge, 2005.
12. Karon Louise A., “Presence in New Rhetoric.” The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response (pp. 163-178). Ed. Ray Dearin. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1989.
13. Kaufer David., Suguru Ishizaki., Brian Butler., Jeff Collins., The Power of Words: Unveiling the Speaker and Writer’s Hidden Craft. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, 2004.
14. Kaufman Charles., Donn. W. Parson., “Metaphor and Presence in Argument.” Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent (pp. 91-102). Eds. David Cratis Williams. W., Michael David Hazen., Studies in Rhetoric and Communication. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1990.
15. Leroux Neil R., “Perceiving Rhetorical Style: Toward a Framework for Criticism.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 22.4 (1992): 29-44.
16. Mader Thomas F., “On Presence in Rhetoric.” College Composition and Communication 24.5 (1973): 375-381.
17. Miller Carolyn R., “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 151-167.
18. Murphy John M., “Presence, Analogy, and Earth in the Balance.” Argumentation and Advocacy 31 (1994): 1-16.
19. Perelman Chaim., Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca., The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
20. Tucker Robert E., “Figure, Ground, and Presence: A Phenomenology of Meaning in Rhetoric.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 87.4 (2001): 396-414.