An architecture for requirements-driven self-reconfiguration

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5565 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 246-260

  Dalpiaz, Fabiano ^a   Giorgini, Paolo ^a   Mylopoulos, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION PROCESS; CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURE; DAILY TASKS; DIAGNOSE FAILURES; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; GROWING DEMAND; MODEL-BASED; REQUIREMENTS MODELS; SELF RECONFIGURATION; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODULAR ROBOTS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

EID: 69849110802     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_22     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Garlan, D., Cheng, S.W., Huang, A.C., Schmerl, B., Steenkiste, P.: Rainbow: architecture-based self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure. Computer 37(10), 46-54 (2004)
2. Feather, M., Fickas, S., Van Lamsweerde, A., Ponsard, C.: Reconciling system requirements and runtime behavior. In: IWSSD 1998, pp. 50-59 (1998)
3. Dardenne, A., Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. In: Science of computer Programming, pp. 3-50 (1993)
4. Emery, F.: Characteristics of socio-technical systems. Tavistock, London (1959)
5. Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. JAAMAS 8(3), 203-236 (2004)
6. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: An abstract architecture for rational agents. In: KR&R 1992, pp. 439-449 (1992)
7. Wang, Y., McIlraith, S., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: An automated approach to monitoring and diagnosing requirements. In: ASE 2007, pp. 293-302 (2007)
8. Jureta, I.J., Mylopoulos, J., Faulkner, S.: Revisiting the core ontology and problem in requirements engineering. In: RE 2008 (2008)
9. Ali, R., Dalpiaz, F., Giorgini, P.: Location-based software modeling and analysis: Tropos-based approach. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Oliv́e, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol.5231, pp. 169-182. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
10. Clark, J., et al.: Xsl transformations (xslt) version 1.0. W3C Recommendation 16(11) (1999)
11. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Mannila, H.: Disjunctive datalog. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 22(3), 364-418 (1997)
12. Dalpiaz, F., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J.: An architecture for requirements-driven self-reconfiguration. Technical Report DISI-09-010, DISI, University of Trento (2009)
13. Oreizy, P., Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: Architecture-based runtime software evolution. In: ICSE 1998, pp. 177-186 (1998)
14. Sykes, D., Heaven, W., Magee, J., Kramer, J.: From goals to components: a combined approach to self-management. In: SEAMS 2008, pp. 1-8. ACM Press, New York (2008)
15. Kramer, J., Magee, J.: Self-managed systems: an architectural challenge. In: ICSE 2007, pp. 259-268. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)
16. Fickas, S., Feather, M.S.: Requirements monitoring in dynamic environments. In: RE 1995, pp. 140-147. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington (1995)
17. Robinson, W.N.: A requirements monitoring framework for enterprise systems. Requirements Engineering 11(1), 17-41 (2006)