Revisiting the core ontology and problem in requirements engineering

Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 71-80

  Jureta, Ivan J ^a   Mylopoulos, John ^b   Faulkner, Stéphane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS; JACKSON; MINIMUM INFORMATIONS; TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERINGS;

ENGINEERING; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 58149173386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RE.2008.13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. G. Y. Bizer, J. C. Barden, and R. E. Petty. Attitudes. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. MacMillan, 2003.
2. J. Castro, M. Kolp, and J. Mylopoulos. Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the tropos project. Inf. Syst., 27(6):365-389, 2002.
3. C. I. Chesñevar, A. G. Maguitman, and R. P. Loui. Logical models of argument. ACM Comput. Surv., 32(4), 2000.
4. P. Cimiano, A. Eberhart, P. Hitzler, D. Oberle, S. Staab, and R. Studer. The smartweb foundational ontology. Technical report, SmartWeb Project, 2004.
5. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42:213-261, 1990.
6. R. G. Dromey. A model for software product quality. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 21:146-162, 1995.
7. A. Eagly and S. Chaiken. Attitude structure and function. In The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
8. M. Glinz. On non-functional requirements. In Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Requirements Eng. Conf., 2007.
9. D. Hitchcock. The concept of argument, and informal logic. In Philosophy of Logic, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 5. Elsevier, 2006.
10. I. J. Jureta, S. Faulkner, and P-Y. Schobbens. Clear justification of modeling decisions for goal-oriented requirements engineering. Req. Eng., Forthcoming.
11. D. Kahneman, I. Ritov, and D. Schkade. Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. J. Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 1999.
12. B. Kitchenham and S. L. Pfleeger. Software quality: The elusive target. IEEE Softw., 13(1):12-21, 1996.
13. D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky. Foundations of measurement. New York: Academic Press, 1971 (Vol. 1), 1989 (Vol. 2), 1990 (Vol. 3).
14. C. Masolo, S. Borgo, A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, A. Oltamari, and L. Schneider. DOLCE : a Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering. Technical report, Institute of Cognitive Science and Technology, Italian National Research Council, 2003.
15. J. Mylopoulos, L. Chung, and B. Nixon. Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: A process-oriented approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 18(6):483-497, 1992.
16. G. Oppy. Propositional attitudes. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1998.
17. J. R. Searle. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
18. J. R. Searle. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Language, Mind, and Knowledge (Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol.7). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975.
19. J. R. Searle. The background of meaning. In J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch, editors, Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, pages 221-232. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980.
20. G. R. Simari and R. P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53(2-3):125-157, 1992.
21. P. Zave and M. Jackson. Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 6(1), 1997.