Ethics: Views from IACUC members

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 291-296

  Houde, Lise ^a   Dumas, Claude ^a   Leroux, Thérèse ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal care and use committee; Animal ethics; Animal research; Ethics; Implicit ethical knowledge

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CARE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; ETHICS; INFORMATION; INTERVIEW; JUSTICE; KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; TRAINING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 69849109104     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290903700311     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Canadian Council on Animal Care (2000). Terms of Reference for Animal Care Committees, 9p. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Council on Animal Care.
2. NHMRC (1997). Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 6th edition, 73pp. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council.
3. Allen, T. (ed.) (2000). U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Regulations. In Information Resources for Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (1985-1999). AWIC Resource series No. 7, pp. 17-56. Beltsville, MD, USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Welfare Information Center. Available at: http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/IACUC/usdareg.htm (Accessed 10.03.09).
4. Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238pp. London, UK: Methuen.
5. Houde, L., Dumas, C. & Leroux, T. (2003). Animal ethical evaluation: An observational study of Canadian IACUCs. Ethics & Behavior 13, 333-350. (Pubitemid 37545279)
6. Birke, L. & Michael, M. (1995). Raising the profile of welfare: Scientists and their use of animals. Anthrozoös 8, 90-99.
7. Thomson, A. (1999). Critical Reasoning in Ethics, 214pp. London, UK: Routledge.
8. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1988). The Computer and the Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science, 448pp. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
9. Galvin, S.L. & Herzog, H.A. (1992). The ethical judgment of animal research. Ethics & Behavior 2, 263-286.
10. Schuppli, C.A. & Fraser, D. (2005). The interpretation and application of the Three Rs by animal ethics committee members. ATLA 33, 487-500.
11. Valdez-Martinez, E., Turnbull, B., Garduno-Espinosa, J. & Porter, J.D.H. (2006). Descriptive ethics: A qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico. Developing World Bioethics 2, 95-105.
12. Garner, R. (2005). Animal Ethics, 224pp. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
13. Walker, R.L. (2006). Human and animal subjects of research: The moral significance of respect versus welfare. Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics 27, 305-331.
14. Barnard, C. (2007). Ethical regulation and animal science: Why animal behaviour is special. Animal Behaviour 74, 5-13. (Pubitemid 47001335)
15. Saucier, D.A. & Cain, M.E. (2006). The foundations of attitudes about animal research. Ethics & Behavior 16, 117-133.
16. Arluke, A. (1992). Trapped in a guilt cage. New Scientist, April 4, 33-35.
17. Arluke, A. (1990). Uneasiness among laboratory technicians. Lab Animal 19, 20-39.