Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 333-350

  Houde, Lise ^a   Dumas, Claude ^a   Leroux, Thérèse ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal care and use committee; Animal research; Ethical evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346271520     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327019EB1304_2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersen, W. (1990). A new approach to regulating the use of animals in science. Bioethics, 4, 45-54.
2. Balls, M., van Zeller, A.-M., & Halder, M. E. (Eds.). (2000). Progress in the reduction, refinement and replacement of animal experimentation, proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences (Development in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, No. 31.) Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Bowd, A. D. (1997). The educative role of an animal car committee in Canada: A case study. Animal Welfare, 6, 309-315.
4. Brody, M. (1989). Animal research: A call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 13, 423-484.
5. Canadian Council on Animal Care. (1989). Ethics of animal investigation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
6. Canadian Council on Animal Care, (1993). CCAC guidelines to the care and use of experimental animals (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
7. Canadian Council on Animal Care. (1998). Guidelines in choosing an appropriate endpoint in experiments with animals for research, teaching and testing. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
8. Canadian Council on Animal Care. (2000a). CCAC policy on the importance of independent peer review of the scientific merit of animal-based research projects. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
9. Canadian Council on Animal Care. (2000b). Terms of reference for animal care committee. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
10. Dresser, R. (1985). Research on animals: Values, politics, and regulatory reform. Southern California Law Review, 58, 1147-1201.
11. Dresser, R. (1988). Standards for animal research: Looking at the middle. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13, 123-143.
12. Dresser, R. (1989). Developing standards in animal research review. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, 9, 1184-1191.
13. Engelhardt, H. T. (1996). The foundations of bioethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Festing, M. F. W. (1995). Reduction in animal use 35 years after Russell and Burch's Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Alternatives To Laboratory Animals, 23, 51-60.
15. Fieser, J. (1996). Do businesses have moral obligations beyond what the law requires? Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 457-468.
16. Finsen, L. (1988). Institutional animal care and use committees: A new set of clothes for the emperor? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13, 145-158.
17. Finsen, L., & Finsen, S. (1994). The animal rights movement in America: From compassion to respect. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Maxwell MacMillan.
18. Forsman, B. (1993). Research ethics in practice: The animal ethics committees in Sweden 1979-1989. Studies in Research Ethics, 4. The Royal Society of Arts and Science in Gothenburg, Center for Research Ethics.
19. Francione, G. L. (1990). Access to animal care committees. Rutgers Law Review, 43, 1-14.
20. Gagnon, E. (1996). Les comités d'éthique: La recherche médicale à l'épreuve [Human ethics committee: The case of biomedical research], Québec, Québec, Canada: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
21. Garner, R. (1993). Animals, politics and morality, Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
22. Guillermo, K. S. (1993). Monkey business: The disturbing case that launched the animal rights movement. Washington, DC: National Press.
23. Leroux, T., & Létourneau, L. (1995). Les être humains et les animaux aussi: La protection des sujets d'expérimentation en recherche biomédicale au Canada [Rights of human beings and animals in biomedical research in Canada], Droit et Sociétés, 10, 171-209.
24. Létourneau, L. (1994). L'expérimentation animale, l'homme, l'éthique et la loi [Animal experimentation, humankind, ethics and law]. Montréal, Québec, Canada: Thémis éds.
25. Mellor, D., & Bayvel, D. (1998). Promoting awareness of the Three Rs. ANZCCART News, 11, 1-5.
26. Orlans, F. B. (1993). In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Plous, S., & Herzog, H. (2001, July 27). Reliability of protocol reviews for animal research. Science, 293, 608-609.
28. Prentice, E., Jameton, A., Antonson, D., & Zucker, I. (1988). Prior ethical review of animal versus human subjects research. Investigative Radiology, 23, 695-697.
29. Rowan, A. N. (1990). Ethical review and the Animal Care and Use Committee. Hastings Center Report, 20, 19-24.
30. Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. (1959). Principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen.
31. Scott, L. R., & Carter, P. D. (1996). The role of veterinarians on animal experimentation ethics committees. Australian Veterinary Journal, 74, 309-311.
32. Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). New York: New York Review of Books.