Effect of platform switching on strain developed around implants supporting mandibular overdenture

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 362-370

  Sabet, Marwa E ^a,c   El Korashy, Dalia I ^a   El Mahrouky, Nesrin A ^b  

^a Ain Shams University   (Egypt)

^b Al Azhar University   (Egypt)

^c AIN SHAMS UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Abutment size; Implant; Overdenture; Platform switching; Strain gages

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, OVERLAY; HUMANS; MANDIBLE;

EID: 69849093235     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4f98c     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Richter EJ. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:602-609.
2. McGlumphy EA, Campagni WV, Peterson LJ. A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:586-593.
3. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, et al. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1372-1383.
4. Todescan FF, Pustiglioni FE, Imbronito AV, et al. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:467-472.
5. Dibart S, Warbington M, Su MF, et al. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: The locking taper system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20: 732-737.
6. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, et al. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19:117-129.
7. Stach RM, Kohles SS. A metaanalysis examining the clinical survivability of machined surfaced and osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent. 2003;12:87-96.
8. Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. NY State Dent J. 2005;71:34-37.
9. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, et al. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005;17:735-740.
10. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling post restorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:9-17.
11. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, et al. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent. 2006;15:313-320.
12. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36- month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:995-1000.
13. Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, et al. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:276-282.
14. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, et al. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: Is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:581-584.
15. Seong WJ, Korioth TW, Hodges JS. Experimentally induced abutment strains in three types of single-molar implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84:318-326.
16. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, De Cooman M, et al. Three-dimensional force measurements on oral implants: A methodological study. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27: 744-753.
17. Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM. The influence of implant geometry on the stress distribution around dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16: 369-379.
18. Mericske-Stern R, Geering AH, Burgim WB, et al. Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:185-194.
19. Mericske-Stern R, Venetz E, Fahrländer F, et al. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:535-547.
20. Assif D, Marshak B, Horowitz A. Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:285-291.
21. Hobkirk JA, Havthoulas TK. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting implant fixed superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:169-174.
22. Tashkandi EA, Lang BR, Edge MJ. Analysis of strain at selected bone sites of a cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:158-164.
23. Brunski JB, Hipp JA. In vivo forces on endosteal implants: a measurement system and biomechanical considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:82-90.
24. Akça K, Cehreli MC, Iplikçioglu H. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strainguage measurements on dental implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:115-121.
25. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, et al. Failure patterns of four osseointegrated oral implant systems. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8:843-847.
26. Sutpideler M, Eckert S, Zobilz M, et al. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application and implant off set on supporting bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:819-825.
27. Monteith BD. Management of loading forces on mandibular distal-extension prosthesis. Part I: Evaluation of concepts for design. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:673-681.
28. Calvo Guirado JL, Saez Yuguero MR, Pardo Zamora G, et al. Immediate provisionalization on a new implant design for esthetic restoration and preserving crestal bone. Implant Dent. 2007;16:155-164.