Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: A 12-Month study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 275-281

  Calvo Guirado, José ^a   Ortiz Ruiz, Antonio José ^a   López Marí, Laura ^a   Delgado Ruiz, Rafael ^a   Mat́e Sánchez, José ^a   Gonzalez, Luis Alberto Bravo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Immediate provisionalization; Platform switching; Resonance frequency analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH SOCKET; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 69849083235     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog.J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-218. (Pubitemid 40341858)
2. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J.Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:615-624.
3. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: Clinical outcomes and esthetic results.Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:552-562.
4. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited.J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973.
5. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D.Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-1130. (Pubitemid 127513679)
6. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-198.
7. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:559-571.
8. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DLCrestal bone changes around titanium implants: A methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-485.
9. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching. A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling post-restorative bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
10. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al.Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants.J Periodontol 2003;74:1785-1788.
11. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P.The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence of absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63:995-996.
12. Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. A case study. NY State Dent J 2005;71:34-37.
13. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R,Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter SS. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2005,17:735-740.
14. AparicioC.Lang NP.Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(suppt 2):2-7.
15. Wennström JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J. Implant-supported single tooth restorations: A 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:567-574.
16. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segáls-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15:313-320
17. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: A proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:995-1000.
18. Levy D, Deporter DA, Pharoah M,Tomlinson G. A comparison of radiographic bone height and probing attachment level measurements adjacent to porous-coated dental implants in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:541-546.
19. Persson LG, Lekholm U, Leonhardt A, Dahlén G, Lindhe J. Bacterial colonization on internal surfaces of Brånemark System implant components. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:90-95.
20. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85:473-478.
21. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS.The effect of inter-implant stance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71:546-549.
22. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-828.
23. Hartman GA, Cochran DL. Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling.J Periodontol 2004;75:572-577.
24. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants. An 18-month clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:26-33.
25. Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 (suppl 1):47-56.