Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: Comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 1923-1928

  Tsutsumimoto, Takahiro ^a   Shimogata, Mitsuhiko ^a   Ohta, Hiroshi ^a   Misawa, Hiromichi ^a  

^a Yodakubo Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Mini open posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Multifidus muscle; Slip reduction; Witlse approach

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MINI OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; MUSCLE INJURY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE MULTIFIDUS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULAR ATROPHY, SPINAL; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 69749126213     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9d28e     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cloward RB. Spondylolisthesis: treatment by laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 1981;154:74-82.
2. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:24-30.
3. Zdeblick TA. Laparoscopic spinal fusion. Orthop Clin N Am 1998;29:635-645
4. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 2002;51(suppl 2):166-181 (Pubitemid 36324055)
5. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28(suppl 15):S26 -35.
6. German JW, Foley KT. Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 2005;30(suppl 16):S52-9.
7. Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, et al. The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine 2006;31:712-716
8. Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 2007;32:537-543 (Pubitemid 46398919)
9. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1968;50:919-926
10. Izumida S, Inoue S. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1986;60:391-394
11. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983;8:693-699 (Pubitemid 14192718)
12. Yoshimoto H, Nagashima K, Sato S, et al. A prospective evaluation of anesthesia for posterior lumbar spine fusion: the effectiveness of preoperative epidural anesthesia with morphine. Spine 2005;30:863-869 (Pubitemid 40632528)
13. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. A prospective randomized study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenac sodium. Spine 2005;30:2357-2361 (Pubitemid 41567595)
14. Taillard W. Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop Scand 1954;24:115-144
15. Dupuis PR, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy JD, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine 1985;10:262-276 (Pubitemid 15097991)
16. Goldstein JA, Macenski MJ, Griffith SL, et al. Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage. Spine 2001;26:1137-1142 (Pubitemid 32429314)
17. McAfee PC. Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:859-880 (Pubitemid 29297565)
18. Zdeblick TA, Phillips FM. Interbody cage devices. Spine 2003;28(suppl 15):S2-7.
19. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999;24:1023-1028 (Pubitemid 29222625)
20. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 2005;30:123-129
21. Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:77-86.
22. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 1993;18:575-581 (Pubitemid 23125026)
23. Fleckenstein JL, Watumull D, Conner KE, et al. Denervated human skeletal muscle: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1993;187:213-218 (Pubitemid 23097887)
24. Uetani M, Hayashi K, Matsunaga N, et al. Denervated skeletal muscle: MR imaging: work in progress. Radiology 1993;189:511-515 (Pubitemid 23321436)
25. Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine. 2nd ed. Melbourne, Australia: Churchill Livingstone; 1991:86-89
26. Bogduk N, Wilson AS, Tynan W. The human lumbar dorsal rami. J Anat 1982;134:383-397
27. Kader DF, Wardlaw D, Smith FW. Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain. Clin Radiol 2000;55:145-149 (Pubitemid 32054539)
28. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 1997;22:1018-1023 (Pubitemid 27203494)
29. Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T, et al. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:624-633
30. Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:98-105.
31. German JW, Adamo MA, Hoppenot RG, et al. Perioperative results following lumbar discectomy: comparison of minimally invasive discectomy and standard microdiscectomy. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E20.
32. Edwards CC, Bradford DS. Instrumented reduction of spondylolisthesis. Spine 1994;19:1535-1537
33. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, et al. Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine 2002;27:59-64. (Pubitemid 34219527)
34. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies. Spine 2005;30(suppl 6):S71-81.
35. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 2001;10:314-319 (Pubitemid 32762776)