A process generation approach of dynamic workflows based description logics

Information Technology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 998-1005

  Zhang, Fu Xin ^a   Du, Yu Yue ^a,b  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

Author keywords

AI planning; Description logics; Semantic activity; Workflow ontology

Indexed keywords

AI PLANNING; DESCRIPTION LOGIC; DESCRIPTION LOGICS; DYNAMIC GENERATION; DYNAMIC PLANNING; HIERARCHICAL WORKFLOW; ONTOLOGICAL REASONING; PLANNING ALGORITHMS; PROCESS GENERATION; WORK-FLOWS; WORKFLOW ONTOLOGY; WORKFLOW PROCESS;

DATA DESCRIPTION; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 69749114780     PISSN: 18125638     EISSN: 18125646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/itj.2009.998.1005     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baader, C, M. Lutz, U. Milicic, U. Sattler, F. Wolter, 2005. A description logic based approach to reasoning about Web service. Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Service Semantics, May 10-14, Chiba City, Japan, pp: 1-12.
2. Baader, F., D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi and P.F. Patel-Schneider, 2007. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, UK., ISBN-13: 9780521876254.
3. Gerevini, A. and D. Long, 2005. Plan constraints and preferences for PDDL3. Technical report, Department of Electronics for Automation, University of Brescia, Italy, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/ papers/pddl-ipc5.pdf.
4. Han, L.Q., Z. Yao, S.F. Liu and Z.Q. Zheng, 2007. Application and Research of Ontology in Workflow Knowledge Meta-model. Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. April. 26-28, Melbourne, Australia, pp: 675-680.
5. Heinl, P., S. Horn, S. Jablonski, J. Neeb, K. Stein and M. Teschke, 1999. A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration. Feb. 22-25, San Francisco, California, United States, pp: 79-89.
6. Korhonen, J., L. Pajunen and J. Puustjhi, 2003. Automatic composition of Web Services Workflows using a semantic agent. Proceedings of the IEEE/MIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WT03). Oct. 13-16, Halifax, Canada, pp: 566-569.
7. Rmderle, S., M. Reichert and P. Dadam, 2004. Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems: A survey. Data Knowledge Engineering, 50: 9-34.
8. Sadiq, S., W. Sadiq and M. Orlowska, 2001. Pockets of flexibility in workflow specifications. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Nov. 27-30, Yokohama, pp: 513-526.
9. Sirin, E., 2006. Combining description logic reasoning with AI planning for composition of web services. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland.
10. Son, T. and E. Pontelli, 2004. Planning with preferences using logic programming. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Logic Programming andNoMonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR04). Jan. 6-8, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp: 247-260.
11. Van der Aalst, W.M.P. and Kees van Hee, 2002. Workflow Management: Models, Methods and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, ISPN: 0-262-01189-1191.
12. Vieira, T., M. Casanova and L. Ferrb, 2004. An ontology driven Architecture for Flexible Workflow Execution. Proceedings of the Web Media and LA-Web 2004 Joint Conference 10th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web 2nd Latin American Web Congress. 2004, Brazilian, Latin American, pp: 70-77.
13. Wang, S., W. Shen and Q. Hao, 2005. Agent Based Workflow Ontology for Dynamic Business Process Composition. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design Proceedings. May. 24-26 Coventry University, UK, pp: 452-457.
14. Wu, Y.M., J. Lu, S.W. Yao and Z.J. Zheng, 2005. Mechanism of Semantic Oriented Flexible Workflow. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications. Jul. 4-7, University Technology, Sydney, pp: 209-214.