Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 656-659

  Bakhshandeh, Maryam ^a   Tutuncuoglu, S Osman ^a   Fischer, Gabor ^a   Masood, Shahla ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Imprint cytology; Lumpectomy; Mastectomy; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34948826484     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20704     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 1991;265:391-395.
2. Klimberg VS, Kepple J. Excision followed by RFA - A new technique to improve local control in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1422-1433.
3. Winchester DP, Cox JD. Standards for diagnosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma: American College of Radiology. American College of Surgeons, College of American Pathologists Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:83-107.
4. Kadmon D. Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Strike early, strike hard! The case for adjuvant radiation therapy. Rev Urol 2002;4:87-89.
5. Veronesi U. How important is the assessment of resection margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer? Cancer 1994;74:1660-1661.
6. Veronesi U, Luini A, Galimberti V, et al. Conservation approaches for the management of stage I/II carcinoma of the breast: Milan Cancer Institute trials. World J Surg 1994;18:70-75.
7. Veronesi U, Volterrrani F, Luini A, et al: Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:671-673.
8. Camp ER, McAuliffe PF, Gilroy JS, et al. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:855-861.
9. Cedan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM IIIrd. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:194-198.
10. Scopa CD, Aroukatos P, Tsamandas AC, Aletra C. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma. Breast J 2006;12:150-153.
11. Mannell A. Breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients - A 12-year experience. S Afr J Surg 2005;43:28-30; discussion 30, 32.
12. Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, Goldberg S, Ceilley E, Powell S. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: Results of a survey. Ann Surg 2005;241:629-639.
13. Beriwal S, Schwartz GF, Komarnicky L, Garcia-young JA. Breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Long-term results. Breast J 2006;12:159-164.
14. Shimauchi A, Nemoto K, Ogawa Y, et al. Long-term outcome of breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer. Radiat Med 2005;23:485-490.
15. Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjyvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:1005-1015.
16. Leopold KA, Recht A, Schnitt SJ, et al. Results of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for multiple synchronous cancers of one breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;16:11-16.
17. Kaplan J, Giron G, Tartter PI, et al. Breast conservation in patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous cancers. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:726-729.