The Limits of Rights-based Discourse

Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 3-14

  Warnock, Mary ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69749092213     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. R Harrison, T Honderich (ed) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford, OUP, 1995) available online at http://www.benthamlinks.com/oxford.htm.
2. RKM Smith Textbook on International Human Rights, 2nd edn (Oxford, OUP, 2005) 39.
3. RKM Smith, International Law (Oxford, OUP, 2000) 349 ff.
4. D Micklos and E Carlson, ‘Engineering American Society: The Lesson of Eugenics’ (2000) 1 Nature Reviews Genetics 153-58.
5. PA Lombardo, ‘Taking Eugenics Seriously: Three Generations of ??? Are Enough’ (2003) 30 Florida State University L Rev 191-203.
6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems (February 2004), available http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=104435
7. Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2003] EWHC Fam 2161.
8. Wall J Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 727; [2005] Fam 1.
9. S Sheldon, ‘Evans v Amicus Healthcare; Hadley v Midland Fertility Services-Revealing Cracks in the “Twin Pillars”?' (2004) Child and Family Law Quarterly 437-52.
10. S Sheldon and S Wilkinson, ‘Hashmi and Whitaker: An Unjustifiable and Misguided Distinction?' (2004) Medical L Rev 137-63
11. T Baldwin, ‘Choosing Who: What is Wrong With Making Better Children?' (in this collection).