|
|
Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 137-163
|
|
Hashmi and Whitaker: an unjustifiable and misguided distinction?
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BLACKFAN DIAMOND ANEMIA;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
COMMODIFICATION;
DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION;
ETHICS;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
GENETIC SCREENING;
GENETICS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TEST;
HUMAN;
HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY AUTHORITY;
INFERTILITY THERAPY;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
MOTIVATION;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
PRESCHOOL CHILD;
REPRODUCTION;
SIBLING;
THALASSEMIA;
UNITED KINGDOM;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY AUTHORITY;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ANEMIA, DIAMOND-BLACKFAN;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
COMMODIFICATION;
DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
GENETIC SCREENING;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HISTOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MOTIVATION;
PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;
REPRODUCTION;
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;
SIBLINGS;
THALASSEMIA;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
|
|
EID: 27644452910
PISSN: 09670742
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/12.2.137 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (50)
|
|
References (0)
|
