Metamodels for variable importance decomposition with applications to probabilistic engineering design

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 996-1007

  Sathyanarayanamurthy, Hemalatha ^a   Chinnam, Ratna Babu ^b  

^a UniBoring Company Inc   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

FAST; Kriging; Metamodels; Probabilistic engineering design; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol

Indexed keywords

FAST; KRIGING; METAMODELS; PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING DESIGN; SOBOL;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; DESIGN; FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT; MODELS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 69649107173     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Awad, M., Sudjianto, A., & Singh, N. (2004). Using moment matching for sensitivity analysis of probabilistic model output. In: Proceedings of DETC'04: ASME 2004 design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Salt Lake City, Utah September 28-October 3.
2. Cacuci D.G. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, Vol. 1: Theory (2003), Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
3. Carter A.D.S. Mechanical reliability and design (1997), New York, Wiley
4. Chan K., Saltelli A., and Tarantola S. Sensitivity analysis of model output: Variance-based methods make the difference. Winter simulation conference, Atlanta, Georgia (1997), ACM press, NY 261-268
5. Chen W., Allen J.K., Mistree F., and Tsui K.-L. A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 18 4 (1996) 478-485
6. Cukier R.I., Fortuin C.M., Schuler K.E., Petschek A.G., and Schaibly J.H. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I. Theory. Journal of Chemical Physics 59 (1973) 3873-3878
7. Du, X. & Chen, W. (2002a). Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. In: ASME design automation conference.
8. Du X., and Chen W. Efficient uncertainty analysis methods for multidisciplinary robust design. AIAA Journal 40 3 (2002) 545-552
9. Frey H.C., and Patil S.R. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Analysis 22 3 (2002) 553
10. Grandhi R.V., and Wang L.P. Reliability-based structural optimization using improved two-point adaptive nonlinear approximations. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 29 1 (1998) 35-48
11. Griewank A. Evaluating derivatives: Principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation (2000), SIAM publisher
12. Haykin S. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. (1999), Prentice Hall, NJ, Upper Saddle River
13. Helton J., Johnson J.D., Sallaberry C.J., and Storlie C.B. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 10-11 (2006) 1175-1209
14. Hoffman F.O., and Hammonds J.S. Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: The need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. Risk Analysis 14 5 (1994) 707-712
15. Homma T., and Saltelli A. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 52 (1996) 1-17
16. Jin, R., Chen, W., & Simpson, T. (2000). Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. In: Eighth AIAA/NASA/USAF/issmo symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Long Beach, CA, September 6-8, structural optimization.
17. MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (pp. 281-297), Berkeley, CA.
18. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., and Conover W.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 2 (1979) 239-245
19. Melchers R.E. Structural reliability analysis and prediction (1999), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England
20. Moody J., and Darken C.J. Fast leaning in networks of locally tuned processing units. Neural Computation 1 (1989) 281-294
21. Park J., and Sandberg I.W. Universal approximation using radial-basis-function networks. Neural Computation 3 (1991) 246-257
22. Parkinson A., Sorensen C., and Pourhassan N. A general approach for robust optimal design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 115 1 (1993) 74-80
23. Phadke M.S. Quality engineering using robust design (1989), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
24. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., and Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science 4 4 (1989) 409-435
25. Saltelli A., Andres T., and Homma T. Sensitivity analysis of model output: An investigation of new techniques. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 15 (1993) 211-238
26. Saltelli A., and Bolado R. An alternative way to compute Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST). Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 26 (1998) 445-460
27. Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E.M. Sensitivity analysis (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York
28. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., et al. Global sensitivity analysis. The primer (2008), John Wiley & Sons
29. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Tarantola S., and Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91 10-11 (2006) 1109-1125
30. Saltelli A., Tarontola S., and Chan K. A quantitative model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41 1 (1999) 39-56
31. Simpson, T. W., Allen, J. K., & Mistree, F. (1998). Spatial correlation metamodels for global approximation in structural design optimization. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences - Design automation conference, Atlanta, GA, ASME, paper no. 98DETC/DAC-5615.
32. Simpson, T. W., Mauery, T. M., Korte, J. J., & Mistree, F. (1998). Comparison of response surface and Kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. In: Seventh AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA, AIAA-98-4755 (pp. 381-391) (Vol. 1), St. Louis, MO.
33. Sobol I.M. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2 (1990) 112-118 (in Russian)
34. Sobol I.M. Quasi-Monte-Carlo methods. Progress in Nuclear Energy 24 (1990) 55-61
35. Sobol I.M. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1 (1993) 407-414
36. Sudjianto A., Du X., and Chen W. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis in engineering design using uniform sampling and saddlepoint approximation (2005), SAE International
37. Taguchi G. Taguchi on robust technology development: Bringing quality engineering upstream (1993), ASME Press, New York
38. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory (1995), Springer-Verlag, New York
39. Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory (1998), John Wiley and Sons, New York
40. Wu, Y.-T., & Wang, W. (1996). A new method for efficient reliability-based design optimization. Probabilistic mechanics & structural reliability. In: Proceedings of the seventh special conference (pp. 274-277).