Bridge builders in it artifact development

Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 819-830

  Tuovila, Sari ^a   Iivari, Netta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bridge builders; Collaborative Development; Empirical Interpretive Research; IT Artifact Development; Representation; User Involvement

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE BUILDERS; COLLABORATIVE DEVELOPMENT; INTERPRETIVE RESEARCH; IT ARTIFACT DEVELOPMENT; REPRESENTATION; USER INVOLVEMENT;

MANAGERS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 69549115446     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Asaro P. (2000). Transforming Society by Transforming Technology: the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10(4), 257-290.
2. Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
3. Blomberg J., Giacomi J., Mosher A. & Swenton-Wall P. (1993). Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.), Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 123-155. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Blomberg J., Suchman, L. & Trigg, R. (1996). Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project. Human-Computer Interaction 11(3), 237-265.
5. Borgholm, T. & Madsen, K. (1999). Cooperative Usability Practices. Communications of the ACM 42(5), 91-97.
6. Bødker, S. (1996). Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development. Human-Computer Interaction 11(3), 215-236.
7. Cavaye, A. (1995). User participation in system development revisited. Information & Management 28(5), 311-323.
8. Clemmensen, T. (2004). Four approaches to user modeling-a qualitative research interview study of HCI professionals practice. Interacting with Computers 16(4), 799-829.
9. Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, Sams.
10. Cooper, C. & Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the users: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of humancomputer interaction. In: Thomas PJ (ed.), The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, pp 48-66. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
11. Finken, S. (2003). Discursive conditions of knowledge production within cooperative design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 57-72.
12. Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (eds.) (1991). Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T. & Andersen, H. (1994). Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design. Proc. CSCW'94, Chapel Hill, USA, pp. 429-439.
14. Iivari, J. & Hirschheim, R. (1996). Analyzing Information Systems Development: a Comparison and Analysis of Eight IS Development Approaches. Information Systems 21(7), 551-575.
15. Jordan, B. and A. Henderson (1994). Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Palo Alto, Ca., Institute for Research on Learning (IRL).
16. Karasti, H. (2001). Increasing sensitivity towards everyday work practice in system design. Doctoral thesis. Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Scientiae Rerum Naturalium, A 362.
17. Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology 22(1), 1-16.
18. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic Controversies: Contradictions and Emerging Confluences. In: Denzin N & Lincoln Y (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition, pp. 163-188. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
19. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Mambrey, P., Mark, G. & Pankoke-Babatz, U. (1998). User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers' Experiences with a New Communication Channel. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7(3-4), 291-313.
20. Markus, M. L. & Benjamin, R. I. (1996). Change agentry-the next IS frontier. MIS Quarterly 20(4), 385-406.
21. Markus, M. L. & Mao, Y. (2004). User Participation in Development and Implementation: Updating an Old Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(11-12), 514-544.
22. Mumford, E (1983). Designing Human Systems for New Technology. The ETHICS Method. Manchester, Manchester Business School.
23. Orlikowski, W. & Iacano, C. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research-A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121-134.
24. Rosson M. & Carroll J. (2002) Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. San Francisco, Morgan-Kaufman.
25. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
26. Suchman, L. (1995). Making Work Visible. Communications of the ACM 38(9), 56-64.
27. Suchman, L. A. & Trigg, R. H. (1991). Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. In: J. Greenbaum M. Kyng (eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems, pp. 65-90. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Viller, S. & Sommerville, I. (2000). Ethnographically informed analysis for software engineers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53(1), 169-196.
29. Williams, M. G. & Begg, V. (1993). Translation between Software Designers and Users. Communications of the ACM 36(4), 102-103.