A genetic linkage map for the saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus)

BMC Genomics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Miles, Lee G ^a   Isberg, Sally R ^a,b   Glenn, Travis C ^c,d   Lance, Stacey L ^c   Dalzell, Pauline ^e   Thomson, Peter C ^a   Moran, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Porosus Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^e New South Wales Government   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLIGATOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOTYPE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REPTILE; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; ANIMAL; AUSTRALIA; CHROMOSOME MAP; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS;

AVES; CROCODYLIDAE (ALL CROCODILES); CROCODYLUS POROSUS; REPTILIA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLIGATORS AND CROCODILES; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FEMALE; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; NORTHERN TERRITORY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 69549114505     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-339     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Toth G Gaspari Z Jurka J Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: Survey and analysis Genome Res 2000, 10(7):967-981 310925 10899146 10.1101/gr.10.7.967
2. Litt M Luty JA A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene American Journal of Human Genetics 1989, 44(3):397-401 1715430 2563634
3. Tautz D Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers Nucleic Acids Research 1989, 17(16):6463-6471 318341 2780284 10.1093/nar/17.16.6463
4. Weber JL May PE Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction American Journal of Human Genetics 1989, 44(3):388-396 1715443 2916582
5. Dib C Faure S Fizames C Samson D Drouot N Vignal A Millasseau P Marc S Hazan J Seboun E et al A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites Nature 1996, 380(6570):152-154 10.1038/ 380152a0 8600387
6. Dietrich WF Miller J Steen R Merchant MA Damron-Boles D Husain Z Dredge R Daly MJ Ingalls KA O'Connor TJ A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome Nature 1996, 380(6570):149-152 10.1038/380149a0 8600386
7. Groenen MA Cheng HH Bumstead N Benkel BF Briles WE Burke T Burt DW Crittenden LB Dodgson J Hillel J et al A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome Genome Res 2000, 10(1):137-147 310508 10645958
8. Ihara N Takasuga A Mizoshita K Takeda H Sugimoto M Mizoguchi Y Hirano T Itoh T Watanabe T Reed KM et al A comprehensive genetic map of the cattle genome based on 3802 microsatellites Genome Res 2004, 14(10A):1987-1998 524423 15466297 10.1101/gr.2741704
9. Knapik EW Goodman A Ekker M Chevrette M Delgado J Neuhauss S Shimoda N Driever W Fishman MC Jacob HJ A microsatellite genetic linkage map for zebrafish (Danio rerio) Nature Genetics 1998, 18(4):338-343 10.1038/ ng0498-338 9537415
10. Maddox JF Davies KP Crawford AM Hulme DJ Vaiman D Cribiu EP Freking BA Beh KJ Cockett NE Kang N et al An enhanced linkage map of the sheep genome comprising more than 1000 loci Genome Res 2001, 11(7):1275-1289 311104 11435411 10.1101/gr.GR-1350R
11. Rohrer GA Alexander LJ Hu Z Smith TP Keele JW Beattie CW A comprehensive map of the porcine genome Genome Res 1996, 6(5):371-391 10.1101/ gr.6.5.371 8743988
12. Solignac M Mougel F Vautrin D Monnerot M Cornuet JM A third-generation microsatellite-based linkage map of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, and its comparison with the sequence-based physical map Genome Biol 2007, 8(4):R66 1896015 17459148 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r66
13. Somers DJ Isaac P Edwards K A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2004, 109(6):1105-1114 10.1007/s00122-004-1740-7
14. Hedges SB Poling LL A molecular phylogeny of reptiles Science 1999, 283(5404):998-1001 10.1126/science.283.5404.998 9974396
15. Ellegren H Molecular evolutionary genomics of birds Cytogenet Genome Res 2007, 117(1-4):120-130 10.1159/000103172 17675852
16. Kumar S Hedges SB A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution Nature 1998, 392(6679):917-920 10.1038/31927 9582070
17. Organ C Moreno R Edwards S Three tiers of genome evolution in reptiles Integr Comp Biol 2008, 48(4):494-504 10.1093/icb/icn046
18. Janes D Organ C Valenzuela N New resources inform study of genome size, content, and organization in nonavian reptiles Integr Comp Biol 2008, 48(4):447-453 10.1093/icb/icn010
19. Shedlock AM Botka CW Zhao S Shetty J Zhang T Liu JS Deschavanne PJ Edwards SV Phylogenomics of nonavian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104(8):2767-2772 1815256 17307883 10.1073/pnas.0606204104
20. ICGSC Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004, 432(7018);695-716 10.1038/nature03154 15592404
21. Thorbjarnarson J Crocodile tears and skins: International trade, economic constraints, and limits to the sustainable use of crocodilians Conserv Biol 1999, 13(3):465-470 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.00011.x
22. Isberg SR Thomson PC Nicholas FW Barker SG Moran C A genetic improvement program for farmed saltwater crocodiles RIRDC Publication Canberra: RIRDC Publication 2004
23. Isberg SR Thomson PC Nicholas FW Barker SG Moran C Quantitative analysis of production traits in saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus): I. reproduction traits J Anim Breed Genet 2005, 122:361-369 10.1111/ j.1439-0388.2005.00548.x 16274419
24. Isberg SR Thomson PC Nicholas FW Barker SG Moran C Quantitative analysis of production traits in saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus): II. age at slaughter J Anim Breed Genet 2005, 122:370-377 10.1111/ j.1439-0388.2005.00549.x 16274420
25. Isberg SR Thomson PC Nicholas FW Barker SG Moran C Quantitative analysis of production traits in saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus): III. juvenile survival J Anim Breed Genet 2006, 123(1):44-47 10.1111/ j.1439-0388.2006.00557.x 16420264
26. Isberg SR Thomson PC Nicholas FW Webb GJ Manolis SC Barker SG Moran C Quantitative analysis of production traits in saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus): IV. number of scale rows J Anim Breed Genet 2006, 123(1):48-55 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00561.x 16420265
27. Hayes B Goddard ME Evaluation of marker assisted selection in pig enterprises Livest Prod Sci 2003, 81:197-211 10.1016/ S0301-6226(02)00257-9
28. Allan MF Smith TPL Present and future applications of DNA technologies to improve beef production Meat Science 2008, 80:79-85 10.1016/ j.meatsci.2008.05.023
29. Isberg SR Johnston SM Chen Y Moran C First evidence of higher female recombination in a species with temperature-dependent sex determination: the saltwater crocodile J Hered 2006, 97(6):599-602 10.1093/jhered/ esl035 17114347
30. FitzSimmons N Tanksley S Forstner M Louis E Daglish R Gratten J Davis S Microsatellite markers for Crocodylus: New genetic tools for population genetics, mating system studies and forensics Crocodilian biology and evolution Chipping Norton (Australia): Surrey Beatty and Sons Grigg GFS, Franklin CE 2001, 51-57
31. Miles LG Lance SL Isberg SR Moran C Glenn TC 253 Novel polymorphic microsatellites for the saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) Conserv Genet 2009, 10(4):963-980 10.1007/s10592-008-9600-7
32. Archibald AL Haley CS Brown JF Couperwhite S McQueen HA Nicholson D Coppieters W Weghe Van de A Stratil A Wintero AK et al The PiGMaP consortium linkage map of the pig (Sus scrofa) Mamm Genome 1995, 6(3):157-175 10.1007/BF00293008 7749223
33. Neff MW Broman KW Mellersh CS Ray K Acland GM Aguirre GD Ziegle JS Ostrander EA Rine J A second-generation genetic linkage map of the domestic dog, Canis familiaris Genetics 1999, 151(2):803-820 1460484 9927471
34. Samollow PB Gouin N Miethke P Mahaney SM Kenney M VandeBerg JL Graves JA Kammerer CM A microsatellite-based, physically anchored linkage map for the gray, short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) Chromosome Res 2007, 15(3):269-281 17333535
35. Zenger KR McKenzie LM Cooper DW The first comprehensive genetic linkage map of a marsupial: The tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) Genetics 2002, 162(1):321-330 1462270 12242243
36. Calderon PL Pigozzi MI MLH1-focus mapping in birds shows equal recombination between sexes and diversity of crossover patterns Chromosome Res 2006, 14(6):605-612 10.1007/s10577-006-1059-0 16964567
37. Coimbra M Kobayashi K Koretsugu S Hasegawa O Ohara E Ozaki E Sakamoto T Naruse K Okamoto N A genetic linkage map of the Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus Aquaculture 2003, 220:203-218 10.1016/ S0044-8486(02)00353-8
38. Moen T Hoyheim B Munck H Gomez-Raya L A linkage map of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals an uncommonly large difference in recombination rate between the sexes Anim Genet 2004, 35(2):81-92 10.1111/ j.1365-2052.2004.01097.x 15025566
39. Jones AG Kvarnemo C Moore GI Simmons LW Avise JC Microsatellite evidence for monogamy and sex-biased recombination in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus angustus Mol Ecol 1998, 7(11):1497-1505 10.1046/ j.1365-294x.1998.00481.x 9819904
40. Haldane JBS Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals J Genet 1922, 12:101-109 10.1007/BF02983075
41. Huxley JS Sexual difference of linkage in Gammarus chevreuxi J Genet 1928, 20:145-156 10.1007/BF02983136
42. Lynn A Schrump S Cherry J Hassold T Hunt P Sex, not genotype, determines recombination levels in mice Am J Hum Genet 2005, 77(4):670-675 1275616 16175513 10.1086/491718
43. Hassold T Hunt P To err (meiotically) is human: The genesis of human aneuploidy Nat Rev Genet 2001, 2(4):280-291 10.1038/35066065 11283700
44. Tease C Hulten MA Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells Cytogenet Genome Res 2004, 107(3-4):208-215 10.1159/000080599 15467366
45. Lynn A Koehler KE Judis L Chan ER Cherry JP Schwartz S Seftel A Hunt PA Hassold TJ Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates Science 2002, 296(5576):2222-2225 10.1126/ science.1071220 12052900
46. Campos-Ramos R Harvey SC Penman DJ Sex-specific differences in the synaptonemal complex in the genus Oreochromis (Cichlidae) Genetica 2009, 135(3):325-332 10.1007/s10709-008-9280-8 18536997
47. Kondo M Nagao E Mitani H Shima A Differences in recombination frequencies during female and male meioses of the sex chromosomes of the medaka, Oryzias latipes Genet Res 2001, 78(1):23-30 10.1017/ S0016672301005109 11556134
48. Cohen MM Gans C The chromosomes of the order Crocodilia Cytogenetics 1970, 9(2):81-105 10.1159/000130080 5461083
49. Bennett JH Hayman DL Hope RM Novel sex differences in linkage values and meiotic chromosome behaviour in a marsupial Nature 1986, 323(6083):59-60 10.1038/323059a0 3748181
50. Syvanen AC Toward genome-wide SNP genotyping Nat Genet 2005, 37(Suppl):S5-10 10.1038/ng1558 15920530
51. Bishop MD Hawkins GA Keefer CL Use of DNA markers in animal selection Theriogenology 1995, 43:61-70 10.1016/0093-691X(94)00018-P
52. Miles LG Lance SL Isberg SR Moran C Glenn TC Cross-species amplification of microsatellites in crocodilians: Assessment and applications for the future Conserv Genet 2009, 10(4):935-954 10.1007/s10592-008-9601-6
53. Matsuda Y Nishida-Umehara C Tarui H Kuroiwa A Yamada K Isobe T Ando J Fujiwara A Hirao Y Nishimura O et al Highly conserved linkage homology between birds and turtles: Bird and turtle chromosomes are precise counterparts of each other Chromosome Res 2005, 13(6):601-615 10.1007/ s10577-005-0986-5 16170625
54. Lloyd M Morris PJ Phlebotomy techniques in Crocodilians Bull Assoc Rep Amphib Vet 1999, 9:2-14
55. Sambrook J Fritsch E Maniatis T Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1989
56. Don RH Cox PT Wainwright BJ Baker K Mattick JS 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19(14):4008 328507 1861999 10.1093/nar/19.14.4008
57. Lincoln SE Lander ES Systematic detection of errors in genetic linkage data Genomics 1992, 14(3):604-610 10.1016/S0888-7543(05)80158-2 1427888
58. Marshall TC Slate J Kruuk LE Pemberton JM Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations Mol Ecol 1998, 7(5):639-655 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x 9633105
59. Kalinowski ST Taper ML Marshall TC Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment Mol Ecol 2007, 16(5):1099-1106 10.1111/ j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x 17305863
60. Green P Falls K Crooks S Documentation for CRIMAP, version 2.4 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri USA 1990
61. Kosambi DD The estimation of map distances from recombination values Ann Eugen 1944, 12:172-175
62. Liu M MapDraw: A microsoft excel macro for drawing genetic linkage maps based on given genetic linkage data Heraditas 2003, 25(3):317-321