A practical overview of quantitative structure-activity relationship

EXCLI Journal

Volumn 8, Issue , 2009, Pages 74-88

  Nantasenamat, Chanin ^a   Isarankura Na Ayudhya, Chartchalerm ^a   Naenna, Thanakorn ^a   Prachayasittikul, Virapong ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Multivariate analysis; QSAR; Quantitative structure activity relationship; Quantitative structure property relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 69549112280     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16112156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Angeli C, Bak KL, Bakken V, et al. DALTON, a molecular electronic structure program. Release 2.0; 2005.
2. Bosse E, Roy J, Wark S. Concepts, models, and tools for information fusion. Norwood, MA: Artech House, Inc., 2007.
3. Chen N, Lu W, Yang J, Li G. Support vector machine in chemistry. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2004.
4. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
5. Cros AFA. Action de l'alcohol amylique sur l'organisme. Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Thesis, 1863.
6. Crum-Brown A, Fraser TR. On the connection between chemical constitution and physiological action. Pt 1. On the physiological action of the salts of the ammonium bases, derived from Strychnia, Brucia, Thebia, Codeia, Morphia, and Nicotia. T Roy Soc Edin 1868-1869;25:151-203.
7. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al. Gaussian 03W, Revision C.02. Walling-ford: Gaussian Inc., 2004.
8. Furusjö E, Svenson A, Rahmberg M, Andersson M. The importance of outlier detection and training set selection for reliable environmental QSAR predictions. Chemosphere 2006;63:99-108.
9. Geladi P, Kowalski BR. Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 1986;185:1-17.
10. Goodman IR, Mahler RPS, Nguyen HT. Mathematics of data fusion. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
11. Gordon MS, Schmidt MW. Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. In: Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE (eds.): Theory and applications of computational chemistry: the first forty years (pp 1167-1189). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
12. Hall DL, McMullen SAH. Mathematical techniques in multisensor data fusion. Boston, MA: Artech House, Inc., 2004.
13. Hammett LP. Some relations between reaction rates and equilibrium constants. Chem Rev 1935;17:125-36.
14. Hammett LP. The effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds. Ben-zene derivatives. J Am Chem Soc 1937;59: 96-103.
15. Hansch C, Fujita T. p-σ-π analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J Am Chem Soc 1964;86:1616-26.
16. Hansch C, Leo A. Exploring QSAR. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1995.
17. Helguera AM, Combes RD, Gonzalez MP, Cordeiro MN. Applications of 2D descriptors in drug design: a DRAGON tale. Curr Top Med Chem 2008;8:1628-55.
18. Höskuldsson A. PLS regression methods. J Chemometr 1988;2:211-28.
19. Karelson M, Lobanov VS, Katritzky AR. Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR/ QSPR studies. Chem Rev 1996;96: 1027-44.
20. Karlström G, Lindh R, Malmqvist P-Å, et al. MOLCAS: a program package for com-putational chemistry. Comput Mater Sci 2003;28:222-39.
21. Katritzky AR, Gordeeva EV. Traditional topological indices vs electronic, geometrical, and combined molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR research. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1993;33:835-57.
22. Katritzky AR, Karelson M, Petrukhin R. CODESSA PRO, Florida, U.S.A., 2005.
23. Kendall RA, Aprà E, Bernholdt DE, et al. High performance computational chemistry: An overview of NWChem a distributed parallel application. Comput Phys Commun 2000;128:260-83.
24. Kim K. Outliers in SAR and QSAR: 2. Is a flexible binding site a possible source of outliers? J Comput Aid Mol Des 2007a;21: 421-35.
25. Kim K. Outliers in SAR and QSAR: Is un-usual binding mode a possible source of outliers? J Comput Aid Mol Des 2007b;21: 63-86.
26. Labute P. A widely applicable set of descriptors. J Mol Graph Model 2000;18:464-77.
27. Meyer H. Zur Theorie der AIkoholnarkose. Arch Exp Path Pharm 1899;42:109-18.
28. Molecular Networks GmbH Computerchemie. ADRIANA.Code, Erlangen, Germany, 2008.
29. Nantasenamat C, Naenna T, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. Recognition of DNA splice junction via machine learning approaches. Excli J 2005a;4:114-29.
30. Nantasenamat C, Naenna T, Isarankura Na Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. Quantitative prediction of imprinting factor of molecularly imprinted polymers by artificial neural network. J Comput Aid Mol Des 2005b;19:509-24.
31. Nantasenamat C, Tantimongcolwat T, Naenna T, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. Prediction of selectivity index of pentachlorophenol-imprinted polymers. Excli J 2006;5:150-63.
32. Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Naenna T, Prachayasittikul V. Quantitative structure-imprinting factor relationship of molecularly imprinted polymers. Biosens Bioelectron 2007a;22:3309-17.
33. Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Tansila N, Naenna T, Prachayasittikul V. Prediction of GFP spectral properties using artificial neural network. J Comput Chem 2007b;28:1275-89.
34. Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Naenna T, Prachayasittikul V. Prediction of bond dissociation enthalpy of antioxidant phenols by support vector machine. J Mol Graph Model 2008;27:188-96.
35. Overton CE. Studien über die Narkose. Jena: Fischer, 1901.
36. Randić M. The nature of chemical structure. J Math Chem 1990;4:157-84.
37. Randić M, Razinger M. On characterization of 3D molecular structure. In: Balaban AT (ed.): From chemical topology to three-dimensional geometry. New York: Plenum Press, 1997.
38. Richet MC. Note sur le rapport entre la toxicité et les propriétes physiques des corps. Compt Rend Soc Biol (Paris) 1893;45:775-6.
39. Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, et al. General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 1993;14: 1347-63.
40. Schrödinger, Inc. Jaguar, Version 7.5207; Portland, OR, 2008.
41. Shao Y, Molnar LF, Jung Y, et al. Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2006;8:3172-91.
42. Stewart J. MOPAC2009, Colorado, USA, 2009.
43. Sukumar N, Breneman CM. RECON, Version 5.5; New York, USA, 2002.
44. Taft RW. Separation of polar, steric and resonance effects in reactivity. In: Newman MS (ed.): Steric effects in organic chemistry (pp 556-675). New York: Wiley, 1956. Talete srl. DRAGON, Milano, Italy, 2007.
45. Tetko IV, Gasteiger J, Todeschini R, et al. Virtual computational chemistry laboratory-design and description. J Comput Aid Mol Des 2005;19:453-63.
46. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of molecular descriptors, Vol. 11. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2000.
47. Torra V. Information fusion in data mining. Secaucus, NJ: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
48. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK. The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 2003;22:69-77.
49. Verma RP, Hansch C. An approach toward the problem of outliers in QSAR. Bioorg Med Chem 2005;13:4597-621.
50. Wang L. Support vector machines: theory and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
51. Wavefunction, Inc. Spartan'04, Irvine, California, USA, 2004.
52. Wold S, Trygg J, Berglund A, Antti H. Some recent developments in PLS modeling. Chemometr Intell Lab 2001;58:131-50.
53. Worachartcheewan A, Nantasenamat C, Naenna T, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. Modeling the activity of furin inhibitors using artificial neural net-work. Eur J Med Chem 2009;44:1664-73.
54. Xue L, Bajorath J. Molecular descriptors in chemoinformatics, computational combinatorial chemistry, and virtual screening. Comb Chem High Throughput Screening 2000;3:363-72.