Mobile democracy: Text messages, voter turnout and the 2004 Spanish general election

Representation

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 117-128

  Suárez, Sandra L ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69449106839     PISSN: 00344893     EISSN: 17494001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00344890600736358     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ANDUIZA, EVA and monica Méndez. 2001. Elecciones y comportamiento electoral, 1977-2000. In Política y gobierno en España, edited by Manuel Alcantara and Antonia Martinez. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch: 343-79.
2. AZNAR, JOSÉ MARÍA. 2004. Ocho años de gobierno. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.
3. BARBER, BENJAMIN. 2000/2001. Which technology for which democracy? Which democracy for which technology? International Journal of Communication Law and Policy 6(winter).
4. BEST, SAMUEL and BRIAN KRUEGER. 2005. Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior 27(2): 183-216.
5. CARVETH, ROD and SUSAN KRETCHMER. 2002. Policy options to combat the digital divide in western Europe. Informing Science 5(3): 115-23.
6. CIS (centro dé INVESTIGACIONES sociológicas). 2004. Postelectoral elecciones generales y autonómicas de Andalucía, 2004. Madrid: CIS, March-April.
7. CMT (Comisión Del Mercado De Las Telecomunicaciones). 2002. Informe annual 2002. Madrid: CMT.
8. DAHLGREN, METER. 2005. The internet, public spheres and political communication. Political Communication 22(2): 147-62.
9. DEL ARENAL, CELESTINO. 2003. EEUU y la politica latinoamericana de Espana. Política Exterior 17: 183-93.
10. DEUTSCHE, BANK. 2004. GSM White Paper: Brilliant past, bright future. Global Equity Research, 18 Feb.
11. DÍEZ NICOLAS, JUAN. 2004a. Flashes February 2004. Madrid: Analisis Sociologicos, Económicos y Politicos.
12. DÍEZ NICOLAS, JUAN. 2004b. Flashes March 2004. Madrid: Analisis Sociologicos, Economicos y Politicos.
13. DÍEZ NICOLAS, JUAN. 2004c. Flashes April 2004. Madrid: Analisis Sociologicos, Economicos y Politicos.
14. DI JUSTO, PATRICK. 2004. Protests powered by cellphones. New York Times, 9 Sept.
15. DIMAGGIO, PAUL, ESZTER HARGITTAI, W. RUSSELL NEUMAN and JOHN P. ROBINSON. 2001. Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27(August): 307-36.
16. FORTUNATI, LEOPOLDINA. 2002. The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations. Information, Communication and Society 5: 513-28.
17. GREEN, DONALD and ALAN S. GERBER. 2004. Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
18. GÜÍLLÉN, MAURO F. and SANDRA L. SUAREZ. 2001. Developing the internet: entrepreneurship and public policy in Ireland, Singapore, Argentina, and Spain. Telecommunications Policy 25(5): 349-71.
19. HAVICK, JOHN. 2000. The impact of the internet on a television-based society. Technology in Society 22(May): 273-87.
20. ITU (International Telecommunications Union). 2001. Telecommunication indicators in the Eurostat area 2001. Geneva: ITU. n.d. Free indicators. Geneva: ITU. Available online at www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/, accessed May 2004.
21. LING, RICH. 2004. The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
22. MICHAVILA, NARCISO. 2005. Guerra, terrorismo, y elecciones: incidencia electoral de los atentados Islamitas en Madrid. Real Instituto el Cano, Working Paper no. 13/2005.
23. NOKIA networks. 2003. ‘A History of Third Generation Mobile 3G’. March.
24. NORIEGA SANDBER, RAQUEL and GASPAR ARINO ORTIZ. 2004. Liberalizacion y competencia en el sector de las telecomunicaciones: balance 1998-2003. ín Privatizaciones y liberalizaciones en españa: balance y resultados 1996-2003. Granada: Editorial Comares: 69-238.
25. NORRIS, PIPA. 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. NORRIS, PIPA. 2002. Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. PAPACHARISSI, ZIZI. 2002. The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society 4: 9-27.
28. PEW. 2003. The Pew global attitudes project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
29. PIVEN, DAVID. 2002. The mobilization calendar: The time dependent effects of personal contact turnout. American Politics Research 30(3).
30. PUTNAM, ROBERT. 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31. RAFAEL, VICENTE L. 2003. The cell phone and the crowd. Public Culture 15(Fall): 403.
32. RHEINGOLD, HOWARD. 2002. Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Perseus.
33. SMOREDA, ZBIGNIEW and FRANKTHOMAS, N.D. Uses of SMS (1) in Europe. European Telecom Operator’s Research Consortium. Available online at www.eurescom.de/~ftproot/web-deliverables/public/p900-series/p903/sms_use/w1-sms.html, accessed May 2004.
34. TRENZADO, MANUEL and JUAN NUNEZ. 2001. Los medios de comunicación. In Política y gobierno en España, edited by Manuel Alcantara and Antonia Martínez. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch: Valencia: 493-531.
35. VA AELST, PETER and STEFAAN WALGRAVE. 2002. New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. Information Communication and Society 5: 465-93.
36. WASHINGTON, POST. 2003. Outbreak gave China’s Hu an opening. Washington Post, 13 May, available online at www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentid =A47408-2003May12¬found=true, accessed May 2004.
37. YARDLEY, JIM. 2005. A hundred cellphones bloom, and Chinese take to the streets. New York Times, 25 April.