Distribution-preserving statistical disclosure limitation

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 4228-4242

  Woodcock, Simon D ^a   Benedetto, Gary ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b U S CENSUS BUREAU   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIAL DATA; DENSITY-BASED; DISCLOSURE RISK; HIGHER MOMENTS; LARGE-SCALE APPLICATIONS; LIMITED INFORMATION; MICRODATA; PRACTICAL METHOD; SAMPLING ERRORS; STATISTICAL DISCLOSURE; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; SUB-DOMAINS; SYNTHETIC DATA; SYNTHETIC DATASETS;

EID: 69449097079     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abowd J.M., Stephens B.E., Vilhuber L., Andersson F., McKinney K.L., Roemer M., and Woodcock S. The LEHD infrastructure files and the creation of the quarterly workforce indicators. In: Dunne T., Jensen J.B., and Roberts M.J. (Eds). Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data (2009), University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research 149-230 (Chapter 5)
2. Abowd J.M., and Woodcock S.D. Disclosure limitation in longitudinal linked data. In: Doyle P., Lane J.I., Theeuwes J.J., and Zayatz L.V. (Eds). Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies (2001), North-Holland 215-278 (Chapter 10)
3. Domingo-Ferrer J., and Torra V. Disclosure risk assessment in statistical microdata protection via advanced record linkage. Statistics and Computing 13 (2003) 343-354
4. Duncan, G.T., Keller-McNulty, S.A., Stokes, S.L., 2001. Disclosure risk vs. data utility: The r-u confidentiality map. National Institute of Statistical Sciences Technical Report No. 121
5. Duncan G.T., and Lambert D. Disclosure-limited data dissemination. Journal of American Statistical Association 81 393 (1986) 10-18
6. Elliot M. Disclosure risk assessment. In: Doyle P., Lane J.I., Theeuwes J.J.M., and Zayatz L.M. (Eds). Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies (2001), North-Holland 75-90 (Chapter 4)
7. Fienberg, S.E., 1994. A radical proposal for the provision of micro-data samples and the preservation of confidentiality. Carnegie Mellon University Department of Statistics Technical Report No. 611
8. Fienberg S.E., and Makov U.E. Confidentiality, uniqueness, and disclosure limitation for categorical data. Journal of Official Statistics 14 4 (1998) 385-397
9. Fienberg S.E., Makov U.E., and Steele R.J. Disclosure limitation using perturbation and related methods for categorical data. Journal of Official Statistics 14 4 (1998) 485-502
10. Kennickell, A.B., 1997. Multiple imputation and disclosure protection: The case of the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances. SCF Working Paper
11. Lambert D. Measures of disclosure risk and harm. Journal of Official Statistics 9 2 (1993) 313-331
12. Lin L.I.-K., and Vonesh E.F. An empirical nonlinear data-fitting approach for transforming data to normality. The American Statistician 43 4 (1989) 237-243
13. Little, R., Liu, F., 2003. Selective multiple imputation of keys for statistical disclosure control in microdata. The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series
14. Muralidhar K., and Sarathy R. A theoretical basis for perturbation methods. Statistics and Computing 13 (2003) 329-335
15. Nusser S., Carriquiry A., Dodd K., and Fuller W. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 436 (1996) 1440-1449
16. Raghunathan T., Reiter J., and Rubin D. Multiple imputation for statistical disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics 19 1 (2003) 1-16
17. Raghunathan T.E., Lepkowski J.M., Hoewyk J.V., and Solenberger P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology 27 1 (2001) 85-95
18. Reiter J.P. Satisfying disclosure restrictions with synthetic data sets. Journal of Official Statistics 18 4 (2002) 531-544
19. Reiter J.P. Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Survey Methodology 29 (2003) 181-188
20. Reiter J.P. Simultaneous use of multiple imputation for missing data and disclosure limitation. Survey Methodology 30 (2004) 235-242
21. Reiter J.P. Estimating risks of identification disclosure in microdata. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100 472 (2005) 1103-1112
22. Reiter J.P. Releasing multiply-imputed, synthetic public use microdata: An illustration and empirical study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (2005) 185-205
23. Reiter J.P. Significance test for multi-component estimands from multiply-imputed, synthetic microdata. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 131 (2005) 365-377
24. Reiter J.P. Using CART to generate partially synthetic, public use microdata. Journal of Official Statistics 21 (2005) 441-465
25. Reiter J.P., and Raghunathan T.E. The multiple adaptations of multiple imputation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 (2007) 1462-1471
26. Rubin D.B. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys (1987), Wiley, New York
27. Rubin D.B. Discussion of statistical disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics 9 2 (1993) 461-468
28. Sarathy R., Muralidhar K., and Parsa R. Perturbing nonnormal confidential attributes: The copula approach. Management Science 48 12 (2002) 1613-1627
29. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6 (1978) 461-464
30. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (1986), Chapman and Hall, New York
31. Willenborg L., and de Waal T. Statistical Disclosure Control in Practice (1996), Springer-Verlag
32. Winkler W.E. Re-identification methods for masked microdata. In: Doming-Ferrer J., and Torra V. (Eds). Privacy in Statistical Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3050 (2004), Springer 216-230