Single centrosome manipulation reveals its electric charge and associated dynamic structure

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1022-1030

  Hormeno S ^a   Ibarra, B ^a   Chichon F J ^a   Habermann, K ^b   Lange, B M H ^b   Valpuesta, J M ^a   Carrascosa, J L ^a   Arias Gonzalez, J R ^a,c  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTO MADRILEÑO DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS EN NANOCIENCIA IMDEA NANOCIENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL ORGANELLE; CENTROSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRON; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ELECTROPHORESIS; EMBRYO; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICROELECTRODE; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PH MEASUREMENT; SPECTROSCOPY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE CHARGE; THERMAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 69449085376     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Doxsey, S. 2001. Re-evaluating centrosome function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:688-698.
2. Bettencourt-Dias, M., and D. M. Glover. 2007. Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understanding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 460:451-463.
3. Bornens, M. 2002. Centrosome composition and microtubule anchoring mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:25-34.
4. Lange, B. M. H., and K. Gull. 1996. Structure and function of the centriole in animal cells: progress and questions. Trends Cell Biol. 6:348-352.
5. Moritz, M., M. B. Braunfeld, J. C. Fung, J. W. Sedat, B. M. Alberts, et al. 1995. Three-dimensional structural characterization of centrosomes from early Drosophila embryos. J. Cell Biol. 130:1149-1159.
6. Ibrahim, R., C. Messaoudi, F. J. Chichon, C. Celati, and S. Marco. 2009. Electron tomography study of isolated human centrioles. Microsc. Res. Tech. 72:42-48.
7. Gonzalez, C., G. Tavosanis, and C. Mollinari. 1998. Centrosomes and microtubule organization during Drosophila development. J. Cell Sci. 111:2697-2706. (Pubitemid 28479194)
8. Baron, A. T., V. J. Suman, E. Nemeth, and J. L. Salisbury. 1994. The pericentriolar lattice of PTK2 cells exhibits temperature and calciummodulated behavior. J. Cell Sci. 107:2993-3003.
9. McCaig, C. D., A. M. Rajnicek, B. Song, and M. Zhao. 2005. Controlling cell behavior electrically: Current views and future potential. Physiol. Rev. 85:943-978.
10. Tyner, K. M., R. Kopelman, and M. A. Philbert. 2007. "Nanosized voltmeter" enables cellular-wide electric field mapping. Biophys. J. 93:1163-1174.
11. Kovacic, P. 2008. Bioelectrostatics: review of widespread importance in biochemistry. J. Electrostat. 66:124-129.
12. Stracke, R., K. J. Böhm, L. Wollweber, J. A. Tuszynski, and E. Unger. 2002. Analysis of the migration behavior of single microtubules in electric fields. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293:602-609.
13. van den Heuvel, M. G. L., M. P. de Graaff, S. G. Lemay, and C. Dekker. 2007. Electrophoresis of individual microtubules in microchannels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:7770-7775.
14. Gagliardi, L. J. 2002. Electrostatic force in prometaphase, metaphase, and anaphase-A chromosome motions. Phys. Rev. E. 66:011901.
15. Gagliardi, L. J. 2008. Induced electrostatic charge in poleward motion of chromosomes during mitosis. J. Electrostat. 66:147-155.
16. Vassilev, P. H., and M. Kanazirska. 1985. The role of cytoskeleton in the mechanisms of electric field effects and information transfer in cellular systems. Med. Hypotheses. 16:93-96.
17. Zhao, M., J. V. Forrester, and C. D. McCaig. 1999. A small, physiological electric field orients cell division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:4942-4946.
18. Detrich, III, H. W., and S. A. Overton. 1986. Heterogeneity and structure of brain tubulins from cold-adapted Antarctic fishes. Comparison to brain tubulins from a temperate fish and a mammal. J. Biol. Chem. 261:10922-10930.
19. Linhartová, I., E. Dráberová, V. Viklický , and P. Dráber. 1993. Distribution of non-class-III β-tubulin isoforms in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. FEBS Lett. 320:79-82. (Pubitemid 23089161)
20. Hormeño, S., and J. R. Arias-Gonzalez. 2006. Exploring mechanochemical processes in the cell with optical tweezers. Biol. Cell. 98:679-695.
21. Ashkin, A., and J. M. Dziedzic. 1987. Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria. Science. 235:1517-1520. (Pubitemid 17038091)
22. Ashkin, A., and J. M. Dziedzic. 1989. Internal cell manipulation using infrared laser traps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86:7914-7918.
23. Fuhr, G., Th. Schnelle, T. Müller, H. Hitzler, S. Monajembashi, et al. 1998. Force measurements of optical tweezers in electro-optical cages. Appl. Phys. A. 67:385-390.
24. Brouhard, G. J., J. H. Stear, T. L. Noetzel, J. Al-Bassam, K. Kinoshita, et al. 2008. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell. 132:79-88.
25. Barr, A. R., and F. Gergely. 2008. MCAK-independent functions of ch- Tog/XMAP215 in microtubule plus-end dynamics. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:7199-7211.
26. Lange, B. M. H., G. Kirfel, I. Gestmann, V. Herzog, and C. Gonzalez. 2005. Structure and microtubule-nucleation activity of isolated Drosophila embryo centrosomes characterized by whole mount scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Histochem. Cell Biol. 124:325-334.
27. Smith, S. B., Y. Cui, and C. Bustamante. 2003. An optical-trap force transducer that operates by direct measurement of light momentum. Methods Enzymol. 361:134-162.
28. Sivasankar, S., S. Subramaniam, and D. Leckband. 1998. Direct molecular level measurements of the electrostatic properties of a protein surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:12961-12966.
29. Wang, M. C., and G. E. Uhlenbeck. 1945. On the theory of the Brownian motion II. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17:323-342.
30. Berg-Sørensen, K., and H. Flyvbjerg. 2004. Power spectrum analysis for optical tweezers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75:594-612.
31. Mao, H., J. R. Arias-Gonzalez, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, and C. Bustamante. 2005. Temperature control methods in a laser tweezers system. Biophys. J. 89:1308-1316. (Pubitemid 41099012)
32. Mershin, A., A. A. Kolomenski, H. A. Schuessler, and D. V. Nanopoulos. 2004. Tubulin dipole moment, dielectric constant and quantum behavior: computer simulations, experimental results and suggestions. Biosystems. 77:73-85. (Pubitemid 39452326)
33. Paintrand, M., M. Moudjou, H. Delacroix, and M. Bornens. 1992. Centrosome organization and centriole architecture: their sensitivity to divalent cations. J. Struct. Biol. 108:107-128.
34. Wada, K., K. Sasaki, and H. Masuhara. 2002. Electric charge measurement on a single microparticle using thermodynamic analysis of electrostatic forces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81:1768-1770.
35. van den Heuvel, M. G. L., M. P. de Graaff, and C. Dekker. 2008. Microtubule curvatures under perpendicular electric forces reveal a low persistente length. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:7941-7946.
36. Madshus, I. H. 1988. Regulation of intracellular pH in eukaryotic cells. Biochem. J. 250:1-8.
37. Pokorný , J., F. Jelínek, and V. Trkal. 1998. Electric field around microtubules. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 45:239-245.
38. Baker, N. A., D. Sept, S. Joseph, M. J. Holst, and A. McCammon. 2001. Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:10037-10041.
39. Stebbings, H., and C. Hunt. 1982. The nature of the clear zone around microtubules. Cell Tissue Res. 227:609-617. (Pubitemid 13174831)
40. Hirokawa, N. 1994. Microtubule organization and dynamics dependent on microtubule-associated proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:74-81.
41. Sharp, D. J., G. C. Rogers, and M. J. Scholey. 2000. Microtubule motors in mitosis. Nature. 407:41-47.