A comparison of the general linear mixed model and repeated measures ANOVA using a dataset with multiple missing data points

Biological Research for Nursing

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 151-157

  Krueger, Charlene ^a   Tian, Lili ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic; General linear mixed model; Longitudinal methods; Statistical analyses

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PREGNANCY;

EID: 6944231111     PISSN: 10998004     EISSN: 15524175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1099800404267682     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albert P. 1999. Longitudinal data analysis (repeated measures) in clinical trials. Stat Med 19(13):1707-32.
2. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Giorlandiono C, Valensise H, Dell'Acqua S, Romanini C. 1986. The development of fetal behavioural states: a longitudinal study. Prenat Diagn 6:117-24.
3. Cairns B. 1986. Phenomena lost: issues in the study of development. In: Valsiner J, editor. Individual subject and scientific psychology. New York: Plenum. p 97-111.
4. Cnaan A, Laird N, Slasor P. 1997. Using the general linear mixed model to analyze unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med 16(20):2349-80.
5. Davis C. 2002. Statistical methods for the analysis of repeated measurements. New York: Springer. p 125-36.
6. DiPietro J, Hodgson D, Costigan K, Hilton S, Johnson T. 1996. Fetal neurobehavioral development. Child Dev 25:2553-67.
7. Edwards L. 2000. Modern statistical techniques for the analysis of longitudinal data in biomedical research. Pediatr Pulmonol 30(4):330-44.
8. Gottlieb G. 1991. Epigenetic systems view of human development. Dev Psychol 27:33-4.
9. Gottlieb G. 1998. Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: from central dogma to probabilistic epigenesist. Psychol Rev 105(4):792-802.
10. Groome L, Loizou P, Holland S, Smith L, Hoff C. 1999. High vagal tone is associated with more efficient regulation of homeostasis in low-risk human fetuses. Dev Psychobiol 35:24-34.
11. Holditch-Davis D, Edwards L, Helms R. 1998. Modeling development of sleep-wake behaviors: I. Using the mixed general linear model. Physiol Behav 63(3):311-18.
12. Huck S, Cormier W, Bounds W. 1974. Reading statistics and research. New York: HarperCollins. p 103-31.
13. Lawson G, Belcher R, Dawes G, Redman C. 1983. A comparison of ultrasound and direct ECG fetal heart rate detection systems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147:721-2.
14. Nijhuis J, Prechtl H, Martin C, Bots R. 1982. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum Dev 6:177-95.
15. Singer J. 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and growth models. J Educ Behav Stat 24(4):323-55.
16. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. 2000. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer.
17. Willett J. 1994. Measuring change more effectively by modeling individual growth over time. In: Husen T, Postlehwaite T, editors. The International encyclopedia of education. Oxford (UK): Pergamon.
18. Willett J, Singer J, Martin N. 1998. The design and analysis of longitudinal studies of development and psychopathology in context: statistical models and methodological recommendations. Dev Psychopathol 10(2):395-426.
19. Wolfinger R. 1997. An example of using mixed models and PROC MIXED for longitudinal data. J Biopharmacol Stat 7(4):481-500.
20. Wu Y-W. 1996. An application of hierarchical linear models to longitudinal studies. Res Nurs Health 19:75-82.